Shade-induced action potentials in helianthus annuus L. originate primarily from the epicotyl

Plant Signaling and Behavior

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 15-22

  Stahlberg, Rainer ^a   Stephens, Nicholas R ^b   Cleland, Robert E ^a   Van Volkenburgh, Elizabeth ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

Action potentials; Amplification; Ap propaqgation; Decrement; Helianthus annuus l.; Natural induction; Stem growth

Indexed keywords

EID: 33746550878     PISSN: 15592316     EISSN: 15592324     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4161/psb.1.1.2275     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Stahlberg R, Cosgrove DJ. Rapid alteration in growth rate and electric potentials upon stem excision in pea seedlings. Planta 1992; 187:523-31.
2. Stahlberg R, Cosgrove DJ. Comparison of electric and growth responses to excision in cucumber and pea seedlings. II. Long-distance effects are due to hydraulic signals. Plant Cell Environ 1995; 18:33-41.
3. Stahlberg R, Cosgrove DJ. Induction and ionic basis of slow wave potentials in seedlings of Pisum sativum L. Planta 1996; 200:416-25.
4. Stahlberg R, Cosgrove DJ. The propagation of slow wave potentials in pea epicotyls. Plant Physiol 1997a; 113:209-17.
5. Houwinck AL. The conduction of excitation in Mimosa pudica. Rec des Trav Bot Neerl 1935; 32:51-91.
6. Umrath K. Der Erregungsvorgang. In: Ruhland W, ed. Handbuch der Pflanzenphysiologie. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1959:17:24-110.
7. Sibaoka T. Action potentials in plant organs. Symp Soc Exp Biol 1969; 20:49-73.
8. Stahlberg R, Cosgrove DJ. Comparison of electric and growth responses to excision in cucumber and pea seedlings. I. Short-distance effects are due to wounding. Plant Cell Environ 1994; 17:1143-51.
9. Stahlberg R, Cosgrove DJ. Slow wave potentials in cucumber differ in form and growth effect from those in pea seedlings. Physiol Plant 1997c; 101:379-88.
10. Davies E, Zawadzki T, Witters D. Electrical activity and signal transmission in plants: How do plants know? In: Penel C, Grepin, eds. Plant signaling, plasma membrane and of state. University of Geneva, 1995:119-37.
11. Stankovic B, Witters DL, Zawadzki T, Davies E. Action and variation potentials in sunflower: An analysis of their relationship and distinguishing characteristics. Physiol Plant 1998; 103:51-8.
12. Mancuso S. Hydraulic and electrical transmission of wound-induced signals in Vitis vinifera. Austr J Plant Physiol 1999; 26:55-61.
13. Gunar II, Sinyukhin AM. A spreading wave of excitation in higher plants. Doklady Akad Nauk (Proc Acad Sci USSR) 1962; 142:214-5.
14. Pickard BG. Action potentials in higher plants. The Botanical Review 1973; 39:172-201.
15. Hodick D, Sievers A. The action potential of Dionea muscipula Ellis. Planta 1988; 174:8-18.
16. Zawadzki T, Davies E, Dziubinska H, Trebacz K. Characteristics of action potentials in Helianthus annuus. Physiol Plant 1991; 83:601-4.
17. Zawadzki T, Dziubinska H, Davies E. Characteristics of action potentials generated spontaneously in Helianthus annuus. Physiol Plant 1995; 93:291-7.
18. Fromm J, Bauer T. Action potentials in maize sieve tubes change phloem translocation. J Exp Bot 1994; 273:463-9.
19. Opritov VA, Pyatygin SS, Vodeneev VA. Direct coupling of action potential generation in cells of a higher plant (Cucurbita pepo) with the operation of an electrogenic pump. Russian J Plant Physiology 2002; 49:142-7.
20. Malone M, Stankovic B. Surface potentials and hydraulic signals in wheat leaves following localized wounding by heat. Plant Cell Environ 1991; 14:431-6.
21. Wildon DC, Thain JF, Minchin PEH, Gubb IR, Reilly AJ, Skipper YD, Doherty HM, O'Donnel PJ, Bowles DJ. Electrical signaling and systemic proteinase inhibitor induction in the wounded plant. Nature 1992; 360:62-5.
22. Stankovic B, Zawadzki T, Davies E. Characterization of the variation potential in sunflower. Plant Physiol 1997; 115:1083-8.
23. Malone M, Palumbo L, Boari F, Monteleone M, Jones HG. The relationship between wound-induced proteinase inhibitors and hydraulic signals in tomato seedlings. Plant Cell Environ 1994; 17:81-7.
24. Herde O, Fuss H, Pena-Cortes H, Fisahn J. Proteinase inhibitor II gene expression induced by electrical stimulation and control of photosynthetic activity in tomato plants. Plant Cell Physiol 1995; 36:737-42.
25. Herde O, Fuss H, Pena-Cortes H, Willmitzer L, Fisahn J. Remote stimulation by heat induces characteristic membrane-potential responses in the veins of wild-type and abscisic acid-deficient tomato plants. Planta 1998; 206:146-53.
26. Stankovic B, Davies E. Both action potentials and variation potentials induce proteinase inhibitor gene expression in tomato. FEBS Lett 1996; 390:275-9.
27. Stankovic B, Davies E. Intercellular communication in plants: Electrical stimulation of proteinase inhibitor gene expression in tomato. Planta 1997; 202:402-6.
28. Stankovic B, Davies E. The wound response in tomato involves rapid growth and electric responses, systemically upregulated transcription of proteinase inhibitor and calmodulin and downregulated translation. Plant Cell Physiol 1998; 39:268-74.
29. Spalding EP, Slayman CI, Goldsmith MHM, Gradmann D, Bertl A. Ion channels in Arabidopsis plasma membrane. Transport characteristics and involvement in light-induced voltage changes. Plant Physiol 1992; 99:96-102.
30. Stahlberg R, Van Volkenburgh E. The effect of light on membrane potential, apoplastic pH and cell expansion in leaves of Pisum sativum L. var Argenteum Planta 1999; 208:188-195.
31. Stahlberg R, Van Volkenburgh E, Cleland RE. Chlorophyll is not the primary photoreceptor for the stimulation of P-type H+ pump and growth in variegated leaves of Coleus x hybridus. Planta 2000; 212:1-8.
32. Dziubinska H, Trebasz K, Zawadzki T. Transmission route for action potentials and variation potentials in Helianthus annuus L. J Plant Physiol 2001; 158:1167-72.
33. Paszewski A, Zawadzki T. Action potentials in Lupinus angustifolius L. shoots. II. Determination of the strength-duration relation and the al or nothing law. J Exp Bot 1974; 25:1097-103.
34. Trebasc K, Zawadzki T. Light-triggered action potentials in the liverwort Conocephalum conicum. Physiol Plant 1985; 64:482-6.
35. Paszewski A, Zawadzki T. Action potentials in Lupinus angustifolius L. shoots. III. Determination of the refractory periods. J Exp Bot 1976; 27:369-74.
36. Trebasc K, Tarnecki R, Zawadzki T. Characteristics of the light-induced generator potentials in the liverwort Conocephalum conicum. Physiol Plant 1989; 75:20-3.
37. Sibaoka T. Physiology of rapid movements in higher plants. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 1966; 20:165-84.
38. Houwinck AL. The conduction of excitation in Clematis zeylandica and Mimosa pudica. Rec des Trav Bot Neerl 1938; 48:10-6.
39. Stahlberg R, Cleland RE, Van Volkenburgh E. Decrement and amplification of slow wave potentials during their propagation in Helianthus annuus L. shoots. Planta 2005; 220:550-8.
40. Zhang P, Mimura T, Tazawa M. Jumping transmission of action potential between separately placed internodal cells of Chara corallina. Plant Cell Physiology 1990; 31:299-302.
41. Oda K, Linstead PJ. Changes in cell length during action potentials in Chara. J Exp Bot 1975; 26:228-39.
42. Abe T. The shortening and action potential of the cortex in the main pulvinus of Mimosa pudica. Bot Mag (Tokyo) 1980; 93:247-51.
43. Shiina T, Tazawa M. Action potentials in Luffa cylindrica and its effects on elongation growth. Plant Cell Physiol 1986; 27:1081-9.
44. Zimmermann U, Beckers F. Generation of action potentials in Chara corallina by turgor pressure changes. Planta 1978; 138:173-9.
45. Wendler S, Zimmermann U, Bentrup FW. Relationship between cell turgor pressure, electrical membrane potential, and chloride efflux in Acetabularia mediterranea. J Membr Biol 1983; 72:75-84.
46. Goldsworthy A. The evolution of plant action potentials. J Theor Biol 1983; 103:645-648.
47. Pickard BG. Voltage transients elicited by a sudden step-up of auxin. Plant Cell Environ 1984; 7:171-8.
48. Stahlberg R, Cosgrove DJ. A reduced xylem pressure altered the electric and growth responses in cucumber seedlings. Plant Cell Environ 1997c; 20:101-9.