On metapopulation resistance to drift and extinction

Ecology

Volumn 87, Issue 7, 2006, Pages 1844-1855

  Lehmann, Laurent ^a,b   Perrin, Nicolas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LAUSANNE   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Biodiversity; Connectivity; Eigenvalue effective size; Fragmentation; Landscape; Matrix analysis; Stochastic patch occupancy model (SPOM)

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK; CONNECTIVITY; DEMOGRAPHY; EXTINCTION; GENET; GENETIC DRIFT; GENETIC VARIATION; METAPOPULATION; POPULATION GENETICS; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION; SURVIVAL;

EID: 33746545018     PISSN: 00129658     EISSN: 00129658     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[1844:OMRTDA]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Chia, A. B., and E. Pollak. 1974 Inbreeding effective number and effective number of alleles in a population that varies in size. Theoretical Population Biology 6:149-172.
2. Ewens, W. J. 1979. Mathematical population genetics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
3. Gabriel, W., and R. Burger. 1992. Survival of small populations under demographic stochasticity. Theoretical Population Biology 41:44-71.
4. Gaggiotti, O., and I. Hanski. 2004. Mechanisms of population extinction. Pages 337-366 in I. Hanski and O. Gaggiotti, editors. Ecology, genetics, and evolution of metapopulations. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
5. Garner, A., J. L. Rachlow, and J. F. Hicks. 2005. Patterns of genetic diversity and its loss in mammalian populations. Conservation Biology 19:1215-1221.
6. Gilpin, M. E., and M. E. Soulé. 1986. Minimum viable populations: processes of species extinctions. Pages 19-34 in M. E. Soulé, editor. Conservation biology: the science of scarcity and diversity. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
7. Grimm, V., and C. Wissel. 2004. The intrinsic mean time to extinction: a unifying approach to analysing persistence and viability of populations. Oikos 105:501-511.
8. Gundersen, G., E. Johannesen, H. P. Andreassen, and R. A. Ims. 2001. Source-sink dynamics: how sinks affect demography of sources. Ecology Letters 4:14-21.
9. Halley, J. M., and Y. Iwasa. 1998. Extinction rate of a population under both demographic and environmental stochasticity. Theoretical Population Biology 53:1-15.
10. Hanski, I., and O. Gaggiotti, editors. 2004. Ecology, genetics, and evolution of metapopulations. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
11. Hanski, I., and O. Ovaskainen. 2000. The metapopulation capacity of a fragmented landscape. Nature 404:505-758.
12. Hanski, I., and O. Ovaskainen. 2003. Metapopulation theory for fragmented landscapes. Theoretical Population Biology 64:119-127.
13. Hill, W. G. 1972. Effective size of a population with overlapping generations. Theoretical Population Biology 3:278-289.
14. Hubbell, S. P. 2001. The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
15. Iizuka, M. 2001. The effective size of fluctuating populations. Theoretical Population Biology 59:281-286.
16. Karlin, S. 1968. Rates of approach to homozygosity for finite stochastic models with variable population size. American Naturalist 102:443-455.
17. Lande, R. 1987. Extinction thresholds in demographic models of territorial populations. American Naturalist 130:624-635.
18. Lande, R. 1993. Risks of population extinction from demographic and environmental stochasticity and random catastrophes. American Naturalist 142:911-927.
19. Laporte, V., and B. Charlesworth. 2002. Effective population size and population subdivision in demographically structured populations. Genetics 162:501-519.
20. Levins, R. 1969. Some demographic and genetic consequences of environmental heterogeneity for biological control. Bulletin of the Entomological Society of America 15:237-240.
21. Loreau, M., N. Mouquet, and R. D. Holt. 2003. Meta-ecosystems: a theoretical framework for a spatial ecosystem ecology. Ecology Letters 6:673-679.
22. Lynch, M., J. Conery, and R. Bürger. 1995. Mutation accumulation and the extinction of small populations. American Naturalist 146:489-518.
23. Lynch, M., and W. Gabriel. 1990. Mutational load and the survival of small populations. Evolution 44:1725-1737.
24. MacArthur, R. H., and E. O. Wilson. 1967. The theory of island biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
25. Margan, S. H., R. K. Nurthen, M. E. Montgomery, L. M. Woodworth, E. H. Lowe, D. A. Briscoe, and R. Frankham. 1998. Single large or several small? Population fragmentation in the captive management of endangered species. Zoo Biology 17:467-480.
26. Nunney, L. 1999. The effective size of a hierarchically structured population. Evolution 53:1-10.
27. Ovaskainen, O., and I. Hanski. 2001 Spatially structured metapopulations models: global and local assessment of metapopulation capacity. Theoretical Population Biology 60:281-302.
28. Ovaskainen, O., and I. Hanski. 2004. Metapopulation dynamics in highly fragmented landscapes. Pages 73-103 in I. Hanski and O. Gaggiotti, editors. Ecology, genetics, and evolution of metapopulations. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
29. Pannell, J. R., and B. Charlesworth. 1999. Neutral genetic diversity in a metapopulation with recurrent local extinction and recolonization. Evolution 53:664-676.
30. Reed, D. H., and R. Frankham. 2003. Correlation between fitness and genetic diversity. Conservation Biology 17:230-237.
31. Rousset, F. 2003. Effective size in simple metapopulations models. Heredity 91:107-111.
32. Rousset, F. 2004. Genetic structure and selection in subdivided populations. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
33. Richter-Dyn, N., and N. S. Goel. 1972 On the extinction of a colonizing species. Theoretical Population Biology 3:406-433.
34. Wang, J., and A. Caballero. 1999. Developments in predicting the effective size of subdivided populations. Heredity 82:212-226.
35. Whitlock, M. C. 2004. Selection and drift in metapopulations. Pages 153-173 in I. Hanski and O. Gaggiotti, editors. Ecology, genetics, and evolution of metapopulations. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
36. Whitlock, M. C., and N. Barton. 1997. The effective size of a subdivided population. Genetics 146:427-441.
37. Wright, S. 1931. Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics 16:97-159.