Energy and force distributions during mandrel peeling of a flexible tape with a pressure-sensitive adhesive

Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology

Volumn 20, Issue 7, 2006, Pages 661-676

  Williams, John A ^a   Kauzlarich, James J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b University of Virginia   (United States)

Author keywords

Mandrel peeling; Pressure sensitive adhesive

Indexed keywords

ADHESION; DEFORMATION; FORCE CONTROL; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PEELING; POLYMERS; POLYVINYL CHLORIDES; SEPARATION;

DE-ADHESION ENERGY; ENERGY BALANCE APPROACH; LOAD-EXTENSION TESTS; MANDREL PEELING;

ADHESIVE JOINTS; ADHESION;

ADHESIVE LAYERS; BULK SAMPLES; DEADHESION; FORCE DISTRIBUTIONS; FORCE VECTORS; INELASTIC DEFORMATION; LOW SPEED; NONLINEAR BEHAVIOURS; PEEL TESTS; POLYMERIC ADHESIVE; PRESSURE-SENSITIVE ADHESIVES; RATE EFFECTS; STRENGTH OF ADHESIVE JOINTS; TEFLON TAPES;

EID: 33746544115     PISSN: 01694243     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1163/156856106777412464     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. E. Breslauer and T. Troczynski, J. Adhesion Sci. Technol. 12, 367-382 (1998).
2. E. Breslauer and T. Troczynski, Mater. Sci. Eng. A302, 168-180 (2001).
3. I. F. Kawashita, D. R. Moore and J. G. Williams, J. Adhesion 80, 147-167 (2004).
4. J. A. Williams and J. J. Kauzlarich, Tribol. Int. 38, 951-958 (2005).
5. A. N. Gent and R. P. Petrich, Proc. Roy. Soc. A310, 433-448 (1969).
6. R. W. Connelly, W. F. Parsons and G. H. Pearson, J. Rheol. 25, 315-328 (1981).
7. R. K. Gupta, J. Rheol. 27, 171-175 (1983).
8. S. F. Christensen and S. C. Flint, J. Adhesion 72, 177-207 (2000).
9. S. F. Christensen and G. H. McKinley, Int. J. Adhesion Adhesives 18, 333-343 (1998).
10. J. A. Williams and J. J. Kauzlarich, J. Adhesion 80, 433-458 (2004).