|
Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages
|
Texas hospitals' separate paths reflect the debate on immigration.
a
a
NONE
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ARTICLE;
ECONOMICS;
EMERGENCY TREATMENT;
ETHICS;
ETHNOLOGY;
FEMALE;
HEALTH CARE AND PUBLIC HEALTH;
HEALTH CARE DELIVERY;
HISPANIC;
HUMAN;
LEGAL ASPECT;
MALE;
MEDICAID;
MEXICO;
MIGRATION;
PATIENT;
PATIENT ABANDONMENT;
POLICY;
POPULAR APPROACH/SOURCE;
PREGNANCY;
PRENATAL CARE;
PUBLIC HOSPITAL;
STATISTICS;
UNITED STATES;
UTILIZATION REVIEW;
HEALTH CARE AND PUBLIC HEALTH;
POPULAR APPROACH/SOURCE;
EMERGENCY TREATMENT;
EMIGRATION AND IMMIGRATION;
FEMALE;
HEALTH SERVICES ACCESSIBILITY;
HISPANIC AMERICANS;
HOSPITALS, PUBLIC;
HUMANS;
MALE;
MEDICAID;
MEDICALLY UNINSURED;
MEXICO;
ORGANIZATIONAL POLICY;
PREGNANCY;
PRENATAL CARE;
REFUSAL TO TREAT;
TEXAS;
UNITED STATES;
|
EID: 33746530688
PISSN: 03624331
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (3)
|
References (0)
|