Changing marital status and desistance from intimate assault

Public Health Reports

Volumn 121, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 428-434

  Wooldredge, John ^a   Thistlethwaite, Amy ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI   (United States)

^b NORTHERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSAULT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIVORCE; DOMESTIC VIOLENCE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTIMACY; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MALE; MARRIAGE; MARRIED MAN; OFFENDER; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURVIVAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CRIMINAL LAW; FEMALE; PARTNER VIOLENCE; SEXUALITY; SOCIOECONOMICS; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS; TIME; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; CRIMINAL LAW; DIVORCE; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MARITAL STATUS; OHIO; SEXUAL PARTNERS; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; SPOUSE ABUSE; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 33746522520     PISSN: 00333549     EISSN: 00333549     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/003335490612100411     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Campbell J, Rose L, Kub J, Nedd D. Voices of strength and resistance: a contextual and longitudinal analysis of women's responses to battering. J Interpers Violence 1998;13:743-62.
2. Dugan L, Nagin D, Rosenfeld R. Explaining the decline in intimate partner homicide: the effects of changing domesticity, women's status, and domestic violence resources. Homicide Studies 1999;3:187-214.
3. Dugan L, Nagin D, Rosenfeld R. Exposure reduction or retaliation? The effects of domestic violence resources on intimate partner homicide. Law and Society Rev 2003;37:169-98.
4. Gover A, MacDonald J, Alpert G. Combating domestic violence: findings from an evaluation of a local domestic violence court. Criminology and Public Policy 2003;3:109-29.
5. Bachman R, Saltzman L. Violence against women: estimates from the redesigned survey. Special Report. Washington: Bureau of Justice Statistics; 1995 Aug. Report No.: NCJ-154348.
6. Spiwak R, Brownridge D. Separated women's risk for violence: an analysis of the Canadian situation. J Divorce Remarriage 2005;43:105-17.
7. Butts-Stahly G. Women with children in violent relationships: the choice of leaving may bring the consequence of custodial challenge. J Aggression Maltreat Trauma 1999;2;239-51.
8. Wilson M, Daly M. Sexual rivalry and sexual conflict: recurring themes in fatal conflicts. Theoretical Criminology 1998;2;291-310.
9. Catlett B, Artis J. Critiquing the case for marriage promotion. Violence Against Women 2004;10:1226-44.
10. Helling J. Specialized criminal domestic violence courts. Violence Against Women Online Resources 1999 [cited 2006 May 1]. Available from: URL: http://www.vaw.umn.edu/documents/helling/helling.html
11. Gottfredson M, Hirschi T. A general theory of crime. Stanford (CA): Stanford University Press; 1990.
12. Wooldredge J, Thistlethwaite A. Reconsidering domestic violence recidivism: conditioned effects of legal controls by individual and aggregate levels of stake in conformity. J Quantitative Criminology 2002;18:45-70.
13. Wooldredge J, Thistlethwaite A. Reconsidering domestic violence recidivism: individual and contextual effects of court dispositions and stake in conformity. Final report. Washington: National Institute of Justice; 1999.
14. Clerk of Courts, Hamilton County, Ohio [cited 2006 Apr 25]. Available from: URL: http://www.courtclerk.og/cpciv_namesearch.asp
15. Campbell J. Assessing dangerousness in domestic violence cases: history, challenges, and opportunities. Criminology and Public Policy 2005;4:653-72.
16. Sherman L, Smith D, Schmidt J, Rogan D. Crime, punishment, and stake in conformity: legal and informal control of domestic violence. Am Sociol Rev 1992;57:680-90.
17. Berk R, Newton P. Does arrest really deter wife battery? An effort to replicate the findings of the Minneapolis Spouse Abuse Experiment. Am Sociol Rev 1985;50:253-62.
18. Sampson R, Laub J. Crime in the making: pathways and turning points through life. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press; 1993.
19. Jaffe P, Crooks C. Understanding women's experiences parenting in the context of domestic violence: implications for community and court-related service providers. Violence Against Women Online Resources 2005 [cited 2005 Apr]. Available from: URL: http://www.vaw.umn.edu/documents/commissioned/ parentingindv/parentingindv.html
20. Kernic M, Monary-Ernsdorff D, Koepsell J, Holt V. Children in the crossfire: child custody determinations among couples with a history of intimate partner violence. Violence Against Women 2005;11:991-1021.
21. Liss M, Stahly G. Domestic violence and child custody. In: Hansen M, Harway M, editors. Battering and family therapy: a feminist perspective. Newbury Park (CA): Sage Publications; 1993. p. 175-87.
22. Zorza J. How abused women can use the law to help protect their children. In: Peled E, Jaffe PG, Edleson JL, editors. Ending the cycle of violence: community responses to children of battered women. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 1995. p. 147-69.
23. Dee T. Until death do us part: the effects of unilateral divorce on spousal homicides. Econ Inq 2003;41:163-83.
24. Davis M. The economics of abuse: how violence perpetuates women's poverty. In: Brandwein RA, editor. Battered women, children, and welfare reform: the ties that bind. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 1999. p. 17-30.