Public sphere and history: Historians' response to Habermas on the "worth" of the past

Journal of Communication Inquiry

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 217-232

  Pinter, Andrej ^a  

^a Slovenian Communication Association

Author keywords

Critical theory; Habermas; Historians of communication; History; Public sphere

Indexed keywords

EID: 33746502008     PISSN: 01968599     EISSN: 15524612     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0196859904266499     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Adorno, Theodor W., and Max Horkheimer. 2002. Dialektika razsvetljenstva. Filozofski fragmenti. Ljubljana, Slovenia: ISH.
2. Anderson, Benedict. 1983. Imagined communities. London: New Left Books.
3. Arendt, Hannah. 1958. The human condition. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
4. Avritzer, Leonardo. 2002. Democracy and the public space in Latin America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
5. Baker, Keith Michael. 1992. Defining the public sphere in eighteenth-century France. In Habermas and the public sphere, ed. C. Calhoun, 181-211. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Barry, Jonathan. 1995. A historical postscript. In Shifting the boundaries, ed. D. Castiglione and L. Sharpe, 220-37. Exeter, UK: University of Exeter Press.
7. Beaud, Paul and Laurence Kaufmann. 2001. Policing opinion: Elites, science, and popular opinion. In Public opinion and democracy, ed. S. Splichal, 55-84. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
8. Benjamin, Walter. 1968. Illuminations. New York: Harcourt.
9. Bradley, Joseph. 2002. Subjects into citizens: Societies, civil society and autocracy in tsarist Russia. American Historical Review 54:1094-123.
10. Brooke, John L. 1998. Reason and passion in the public sphere: Habermas and the cultural historians. Journal of Interdisciplinary History 29:43-67.
11. Dahlgren, Peter. 1991. Introduction. In Communication and citizenship, ed. P. Dahlgren and C. Sparks, 1-25. London: Sage.
12. Eley, Geoff. 1992. Nations, publics, and political cultures: Placing Habermas in the nineteenth century. In Habermas and the public sphere, ed. C. Calhoun, 289-339. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13. Fraser, Nancy. 1992. Rethinking the public sphere. In Habermas and the public sphere, ed. C. Calhoun, 109-42. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14. Habermas, Jürgen. 1979. Communication and social evolution. London: Heinemann.
15. -. 1989. Structural transformation of the public sphere. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
16. -. 1992a. Autonomy and solidarity. London: Verso.
17. -. 1992b. Further reflections on the public sphere. In Habermas and the public sphere, ed. C. Calhoun, 421-61. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18. -. 1996. Between facts and norms. Oxford, UK: Polity.
19. -. 1998. A Berlin Republic. Oxford, UK: Polity.
20. Hahn, Chris and Elizabeth Dunn, eds. 1996. Civil society: Challenging western models. London: Routledge.
21. Hardt, Hanno. 1979. Social theories of the press. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
22. -. 1992. Critical communication studies. London: Routledge.
23. -. 1996. The making of the public sphere: Class relations and communication in the United States. Javnost/The Public 3:7-23.
24. -. 1998. Interactions. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
25. -. 2001. Social theories of the press. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
26. Hartley, John. 1992. The politics of pictures. London: Routledge.
27. Hohendahl, Peter Uwe. 2000. Öffentlichkeit. Stuttgart, Germany: Metzler.
28. How, Alan R. 2001. Habermas, history and social evolution. Sociology 35:177-94.
29. Jay, Martin. 1985. Habermas and modernism. In Habermas and modernity, ed. R. Bernstein, 125-39. Oxford, UK: Polity.
30. Keane, John. 1991. The media and democracy. Oxford, UK: Polity.
31. -. 2003. Global civil society? Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
32. Koselleck, Reinhart. 1988. Critique and crisis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33. Kramer, Lloyd. 1992. Habermas, history and critical theory. In Habermas and the public sphere, ed. C. Calhoun, 236-58. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34. La Vopa, Anhony J. 1992. Conceiving a public: ideas and society in eighteenth-century Europe. Journal of Modern History 64:79-116.
35. Mah, Harold. 2000. Phantasies of the public sphere: Rethinking the Habermas of historians. Journal of Modern History 72:153-82.
36. McLuskie, Ed. 2003. Reading Humboldt through the theory of communicative action. Javnost/ The Public 10:25-44.
37. Pesante, Maria Luisa. 1995. An impartial actor: The private and the public sphere in Adam Smith's theory of moral sentiments. In Shifting the boundaries, ed. D. Castiglione and L. Sharpe, 172-95. Exeter, UK: University of Exeter Press.
38. Peters, John D. 1993. Distrust of representation: Habermas on the public sphere. Media, Culture, and Society 15:541-71.
39. -. 2001. Realism in social representation and the fate of the public. In Public opinion and democracy, ed. S. Splichal, 85-102. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
40. Sennett, Richard. 1979. The fall of public man. Houndmills, UK: Macmillan.
41. Splichal, Slavko. 2001. Defining public opinion in history. In Ferdinand Tönnies on public opinion, selections and analyses, ed. H. Hardt and S. Splichal, 11-48. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
42. -. 2003. Principles of publicity and press freedom. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
43. Strum, Arthur. 1994. A bibliography of the concept Öffentlichkeit. New German Critique 61:161-202.
44. Škerlep, Andrej. 2002. Javnost, javno mnenje in diskurzivna racionalnost. Družboslovne razprave 41:191-202.
45. Taylor, Charles. 2002. Modern social imaginaries. Public Culture 14:15-26.
46. Tönnies, Ferdinand. 1998. Kritika javnega mnenja. Ljubljana, Slovenia: FDV.
47. Warner, Michael. 1990. The letters of the republic. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
48. Williams, Raymond. 1971. The long revolution. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
49. Wolff, Larry. 2001. Venice and the Slavs. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.