Identity matching-to-sample with olfactory stimuli in rats

Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

Volumn 85, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 203-221

  Peña, Tracy ^a   Pitts, Raymond C ^a   Galizio, Mark ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA WILMINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Concept learning; Digging; Discrimination; Matching to sample; Olfactory learning; Rat; Stimulus control

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; CONCEPT FORMATION; MALE; ODOR; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; RAT; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SPRAGUE DAWLEY RAT;

ANIMALS; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; CONCEPT FORMATION; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; SMELL; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL IDENTIFICATION;

EID: 33746497771     PISSN: 00225002     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2006.111-04     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Barros, R., Galvāo, O., & McIlvane, W. J. (2002). Generalized identity matching-to-sample in cebus apella. The Psychological Record, 52, 441-460.
2. Bunsey, M., & Eichenbaum, H. (1996). Conservation of hippocampal memory function in rats and humans. Nature, 379, 255-257.
3. Carter, D. E., & Werner, T. J. (1978). Complex learning and information processing by pigeons: A critical analysis. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 29, 565-601.
4. Cook, R. G., Katz, J. S., & Cavoto, B. R. (1997). Pigeon same-different concept learning with multiple stimulus classes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 23, 417-433.
5. Gumming, W. W., & Berryman, R. (1965). The complex discriminated operant: Studies of matching-to-sample and related problems. In D. I. Mostofsky (Ed.), Stimulus generalization (pp. 284-330). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
6. Dube, W. V., McIlvane, W. J., & Green, G. (1992). An analysis of generalized matching-to-sample test procedures. The Psychological Record, 42, 17-28.
7. Dudchenko, P. A., Wood, E. R., & Eichenbaum, H. (2000). Neurotoxic hippocampal lesions have no effect on odor span and little effect on odor recognition memory, but produce significant impairments on spatial span, recognition and alternation. The Journal of Neuroscience, 20, 2964-2977.
8. Dusek, J. A., & Eichenbaum, H. (1998). The hippocampus and transverse patterning guided by olfactory cues. Behavioral Neuroscience, 112, 762-771.
9. Herman, L. M., & Gordon, J. A. (1974). Auditory delayed matching in the bottlenose dolphin. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 21, 19-26.
10. Iversen, I. (1993). Acquisition of matching-to-sample performances in rats using visual stimuli on nose keys. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 59, 471-482.
11. Iversen, I. (1997). Matching-to-sample performance in rats: A case of mistaken identity? Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 68, 27-45.
12. Kastak, D., & Schusterman, R. (1994). Transfer of visual identity matching-to-sample in two California sea lions (Zalophus califonianus). Animal Learning & Behavior, 22, 427-435.
13. Katz, J. S., Wright, A. A., & Bachevalier, J. (2002). Mechanisms of same/different abstract concept learning by rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatto). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 28, 358-368.
14. Lu, X. M., Sotnik, B. M., & Silberberg, A. M. (1993). Odor matching and odor memory in the rat. Physiology and Behavior, 53, 795-804.
15. Mihalick, S. M., Langlois, J. C., Krienke, J. D., & Dube, W. V. (2000). An olfactory discrimination procedure for mice. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 73, 305-318.
16. Mishkin, M., & Delacour, J. (1975). An analysis of short-term visual memory in the monkey. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 1, 326-334.
17. Nakagawa, E. (2000). Transfer of learning between matching (or non-matching)-to-sample and samedifferent discriminations in rats. The Psychological Record, 50, 771-805.
18. Oden, D. L., Thompson, R. K. R., & Premack, D. (1988). Spontaneous transfer of matching by infant chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 14, 140-145.
19. Otto, T., & Eichenbaum, H. (1992). Complementary roles of the orbital prefrontal cortex and the perirhinal-entorhinal cortices in an odor-guided delayed nonmatching-to-sample task. Behavioral Neuroscience, 106, 762-775.
20. Pack, A. A., Herman, L. M., & Roitblat, H. L. (1991). Generalization of visual matching and delayed matching by a California sea lion (Zalophus califomianus). Animal Learning & Behavior, 19, 37-48.
21. Prusky, G. T., Douglas, R. M., Nelson, L., Shabanpoor, A., & Sutherland, R. J. (2004). Visual memory task for rats reveals an essential role for hippocampus and perirhinal cortex. Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences, 101, 5064-5068.
22. Rothblat, L. A., & Hayes, L. L. (1987). Short-term object recognition memory in the rat: Nonmatching with trial-unique junk stimuli. Behavioral Neuroscience, 101, 587-590.
23. Wood, E. R., Dudchenko, P. A., & Eichenbaum, H. (1999). The global record of memory in hippocampal neuronal activity. Nature, 397, 613-616.
24. Wright, A. A. (1997). Concept learning and learning strategies. Psychological Science, 8, 119-123.
25. Wright, A. A., Cook, R. G., Rivera, J. J., Sands, S. F., & Delius, J. D. (1988). Concept learning by pigeons: Matching-to-sample with trial-unique video picture stimuli. Animal Learning & Behavior, 16, 436-444.
26. Zentall, T. R., Edwards, C. A., Moore, B. S., & Hogan, D. E. (1981). Identity: The basis for both matching and oddity learning in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 7, 70-86.
27. Zentall, T. R., & Hogan, D. E. (1974). Abstract concept learning in the pigeon. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 102, 393-398.
28. Zentall, T. R., & Hogan, D. E. (1976, 30 January). Pigeons can learn identity or difference, or both. Science, 191, 408-409.