The evolution of nestling discrimination by hosts of parasitic birds: Why is rejection so rare?

Evolutionary Ecology Research

Volumn 8, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 785-802

  Grim, Tomáš ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

^b PALACKÝ UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Arms race; Brood parasitism; Co evolution; Discrimination; Evolutionary equilibrium; Evolutionary lag; Recognition

Indexed keywords

AVES;

EID: 33746492829     PISSN: 15220613     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (103)

1. Alcock, J. 1998. Animal Behavior An Evolutionary Approach, 6th edn. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
2. Amundsen, T., Brobakken, P.T., Moksnes, A. and Reskaft, E. 2002. Rejection of common cuckoo Cuculus canorus eggs in relation to female age in the bluethroat Luscinia svecica. J. Avian Biol., 33: 366-370.
3. Beecher, M.D. 1991. Successes and failures of parent-offspring recognition in animals. In Kin Recognition (P.G. Hepper, ed.), pp. 94-124. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Beecher, M.D., Beecher, I.M. and Hahn, S. 1981. Parent-offspring recognition in bank swallows (Riparia riparia): II. Development and acoustic basis. Anim. Behav., 29: 95-101.
5. Britton, N.F., Planqué, R. and Franks, N.R. in press. Evolution of defence portfolios in exploiter-victim systems. J. Math. Biol.
6. Brooker, L.C., Brooker, M.G. and Brooker, A.M.H. 1990. An alternative population/genetics model for the evolution of egg mimesis and egg crypsis in cuckoos. J. Theor. Biol., 146: 123-143.
7. Brooker, M.G. and Brooker, L.C. 1996. Acceptance by the splendid fairy-wren of parasitism by Horsfield's bronze-cuckoo: further evidence for evolutionary equilibrium in brood parasitism. Behav. Ecol., 7: 395-407.
8. Clotfelter, E.D., Whittingham, L.A. and Dunn, P.O. 2000. Laying order, hatching asynchrony and nestling body mass in tree swallows Tachycineta bicolor. J. Avion Biol., 31: 329-334.
9. Crook, J.R. and Shields, W.M. 1985. Sexually selected infanticide by adult male barn swallows. Anim. Behav., 33: 754-761.
10. Cunningham, E.J.A. and Lewis, S. 2005. Parasitism of maternal investment selects for increased clutch size and brood reduction in a host. Behav. Ecol., 17: 126-131.
11. Davies, N.B. 2000. Cuckoos, Cowbirds and Other Cheats. London: T & A.D. Poyser.
12. Davies, N.B. and Brooke, M.L. 1988. Cuckoos versus reed warblers: adaptations and counter-adaptations. Anim. Behav., 36: 262-284.
13. Davies, N.B. and Brooke, M.L. 1989. An experimental study of co-evolution between the cuckoo, Cuculus canons, and its hosts. II. Host egg markings, chick discrimination and general discussion. J. Anim. Ecol., 58: 225-236.
14. Dawkins, R. 1982. The Extended Phenotype. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15. Dawkins, R. and Krebs, J.R. 1979. Arms races between and within species. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 205: 489-511.
16. Dewar, D. 1907. An inquiry into the parasitic habits of the Indian koel. J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc., 17: 765-782.
17. Fraga, R.M. 1998. Interactions of the parasitic screaming and shiny cowbirds (Molothrus rufoaxillaris and M. bonariensis) with a shared host, the bay-winged cowbird (M. badius). In Parasitic Birds and Their Hosts (S.I. Rothstein and S.K. Robinson, eds.), pp. 173-193. New York: Oxford University Press.
18. Futuyma, D.J. 1998. Evolutionary Biology, 3rd edn. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
19. Gaston, A.J. 1976. Brood parasitism by the pied crested cuckoo Clamator jacobinus. J. Anim. Ecol., 45: 331-345.
20. Gill, B.J. 1998. Behavior end ecology of the shining cuckoo, Chrysococcyx lucidus. In Parasitic Birds and Their Hosts (S.I. Rothstein and S.K. Robinson, eds.), pp. 143-151. New York: Oxford University Press.
21. Göth, A. and Hauber, M.E. 2004. Ecological approaches to species recognition in birds through studies of model and non-model species. Ann. Zool. Fenn., 41: 823-842.
22. Grim, T. 2002. Why is mimicry in cuckoo eggs sometimes so poor? J. Avion Biol., 33: 302-305.
23. Grim, T. 2005. Mimicry vs. similarity: which resemblances between brood parasites and their hosts are mimetic and which are not? Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 84: 69-78.
24. Grim, T. in press. Cuckoo growth performance in parasitized and unused hosts: not only host size matters. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol.
25. Grim, T. and Honza, M. 2001. Does supernormal stimulus influence parental behaviour of the cuckoo's host? Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 49: 322-329.
26. Grim, T., Kleven, O. and Mikulica, O. 2003. Nestling discrimination without recognition: a possible defence mechanism for hosts towards cuckoo parasitism? Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 270: S73-S75.
27. Hauber, M.E. 2003. Egg-caping is a cost paid by hosts of interspecific brood parasites. Auk, 120: 860-865.
28. Hauber, M.E. and Sherman, P.W. 2001. Self-referent phenotype matching: theoretical considerations and empirical evidence. Trends Neurosci., 24: 609-616.
29. Hauber, M.E., Russo, S.A. and Sherman, P.W. 2001. Password for species recognition in a brood-parasitic bird. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 268: 1041-1048.
30. Hauber, M.E., Yeh, P.J. and Roberts, J.O.L. 2004. Patterns and coevolutionary consequences of repeated brood parasitism. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 271: S317-S320.
31. Holcomb, L.C. 1979. Response to foster nestlings by red-winged blackbirds at different reproductive stages. Wilson Bull., 91: 434-440.
32. Honza, M., Grim, T., Capek, M., Moksnes, A. and Røskaft, E. 2004. Nest defence, enemy recognition and nest inspection behaviour of experimentally parasitized reed warblers Acrocephalus scirpaceus. Bird Study, 51: 256-263.
33. Hosoi, S.A. and Rothstein, S.I. 2000. Nest desertion and cowbird parasitism: evidence for evolved responses and evolutionary lag. Anim. Behav., 59: 823-840.
34. Jourdain, F.C.R. 1925. A study of parasitism in the cuckoos. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond., 44: 639-667.
35. Kemal, R.E. and Rothstein, S.I. 1988. Mechanisms of avian egg recognition: adaptive responses to eggs with broken shells. Anim. Behav., 36: 175-183.
36. Kilner, R.M., Noble, D.G. and Davies, N.B. 1999. Signals of need in parent-offspring communication and their exploitation by the common cuckoo. Nature, 397: 667-672.
37. Lack, D. 1968. Ecological Adaptations for Breeding in Birds. London: Methuen.
38. Lahti, D.C. and Lahti, A.R. 2002. How precise is egg discrimination in weaverbirds? Anim. Behav., 63: 1135-1142.
39. Langmore, N.E., Hunt, S. and Kilner, R.M. 2003. Escalation of a coevolutionary arms race through host rejection of brood parasitic young. Nature, 422: 157-160.
40. Langmore, N.E., Kilner, R.M., Butchart, S.H.M., Maurer, G., Davies, N.B., Cockburn, A. et al. 2005. The evolution of egg rejection by cuckoo hosts in Australia and Europe. Behav. Ecol., 16: 686-692.
41. Lawes, M.J. and Marthews, T.R. 2003. When will rejection of parasite nestlings by hosts of nonevicting avian brood parasites be favored? A misimprinting-equilibrium model. Behav. Ecol., 14: 757-770.
42. Lichtenstein, G. 1998. Parasitism by shiny cowbirds of rufous-bellied thrushes. Condor, 100: 680-687.
43. Lichtenstein, G. 2001a. Low success of shiny cowbird chicks parasitizing rufous-bellied thrushes: chick-chick competition or parental discrimination? Anim. Behav., 61: 401-413.
44. Lichtenstein, G. 2001b. Selfish begging by screaming cowbirds, a mimetic brood parasite of the bay-winged cowbird. Anim. Behav., 61: 1151-1158.
45. Lotem, A. 1993. Learning to recognize nestlings is maladaptive for cuckoo Cuculus canorus hosts. Nature, 362: 743-745.
46. Lotem, A., Nakamura, H. and Zahavi, A. 1992. Rejection of cuckoo eggs in relation to host age: a possible evolutionary equilibrium. Behav. Ecol., 3: 128-132.
47. Lotem, A., Nakamura, H. and Zahavi, A. 1995. Constraints on egg discrimination and cuckoo-host co-evolution. Anim. Behav., 49: 1185-1209.
48. Marchetti, K. 2000. Egg rejection in a passerine bird: size does matter. Anim. Behav., 59: 877-883.
49. Mark, D. and Stutchbury, B.J. 1994. Response of forest-interior songbird to the threat of cowbird parasitism. Anim. Behav., 47: 275-280.
50. Mason, P. and Rothstein, S.I. 1986. Coevolution and avian brood parasitism: cowbird eggs show evolutionary response to host discrimination. Evolution, 40: 1207-1214.
51. Mateo, J.M. 2002. Kin-recognition abilities and nepotism as a function of sociality. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 269: 721-727.
52. May, R.M. and Robinson, S.K. 1985. Population dynamics of avian brood parasitism. Am. Nat., 126: 475-494.
53. McLean, I.G. and Maloney, R.F. 1998. Brood parasitism, recognition and response: the options. In Parasitic Birds and Their Hosts (S.I. Rothstein and S.K. Robinson, eds.), pp. 255-272. New York: Oxford University Press.
54. McLean, I.G. and Waas, J.R. 1987. Do cuckoo chicks mimic the begging calls of their hosts? Anim. Behav., 35: 1896-1898.
55. Moksnes, A. and Røskaft, E. 1992. Responses of some rare cuckoo hosts to mimetic model cuckoo eggs and to foreign conspecific eggs. Ornis Scand., 23: 17-23.
56. Moksnes, A., Røskaft, E. and Korsnes, L. 1993. Rejection of cuckoo (Cuculus canorus) eggs by meadow pipits (Anthus pratensis). Behav. Ecol., 4: 120-127.
57. Møller, A.P. 1992. Sexual selection in the monogamous barn swallow (Hirundo rustica). II. Mechanisms of sexual selection. J. Evol. Biol., 5: 603-624.
58. Moskát, C., Székely, T., Kisbenedek, T., Karcza, Z. and Bártol, I. 2003. The importance of nest cleaning in egg rejection behaviour of great reed warblers Acrocephalus arundinaceus. J. Avian Biol., 34: 16-19.
59. Mundy, P.J. 1973. Vocal mimicry of their hosts by nestlings of the great spotted cuckoo and striped crested cuckoo. Ibis., 115: 602-604.
60. Nicolai, J. 1964. Der Brutparasitismus der Viduinae als ethologisches Problem. Z. Tierpsychol., 21: 129-204.
61. Nicolai, J. 1974. Mimicry in parasitic birds. Sci. Am., 231: 92-98.
62. Nur, N. 1984. The consequences of brood size for breeding blue tits. I. Adult survival, weight change and the cost of reproduction. J. Anim. Ecol., 53: 479-496.
63. Øien, I.J., Moksnes, A., Røskaft, E. and Honza, M. 1998. Costs of cuckoo Cuculus canorus parasitism to reed warblers Acrocephalus scirpaceus. J. Avian Biol., 29: 209-215.
64. Ortega, C. 1998. Cowbirds and Other Brood Parasites. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press.
65. Payne, R.B. 2005. The Cuckoos. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
66. Payne, R.B., Woods, J.L. and Payne, L.L. 2001. Parental care in estrildid finches: experimental tests of a model of Vidua brood parasitism. Anim. Behav., 62: 473-483.
67. Peer, B.D. and Sealy, S.G. 2004. Correlates of egg rejection in hosts of the brown-headed cowbird. Condor, 106: 580-599.
68. Petit, C., Hossaert-McKey, M., Perret, P., Blondel, J. and Lambrechts, M.M. 2002. Blue tits use selected plants and olfaction to maintain an aromatic environment for nestlings. Ecol. Lett., 5: 585-589.
69. Planqué, R., Britton, N.F., Franks, N.R. and Peletier, M.A. 2002. The adaptiveness of defence strategies against cuckoo parasitism. J. Math. Biol., 64: 1045-1068.
70. Redondo, T. 1993. Exploitation of host mechanisms for parental care by avian brood parasites. Etologia, 3: 235-297.
71. Reed, R.A. 1968. Studies of the Diederik Cuckoo Chrysococcyx caprius in the Transvaal. Ibis, 110: 321-331.
72. Robertson, R.J. and Stutchbury, B.J. 1988. Experimental evidence for sexually selected infanticide in tree swallows. Anim. Behav., 36: 749-753.
73. Rohwer, S. and Spaw, C.D. 1988. Evolutionary lag versus bill-size constraints: a comparative study of the acceptance of cowbird eggs by old hosts. Evol. Ecol., 2: 27-36.
74. Røskaft, E., Rohwer, S. and Spaw, C.D. 1993. Cost of puncture ejection compared with costs of rearing cowbird chicks for northern orioles. Omis Scand., 24: 28-32.
75. Rothstein, S.I. 1974. Mechanisms of avian egg recognition: possible learned and innate factors. Auk, 91: 796-807.
76. Rothstein, S.I. 1975. An experimental and teleonomic investigation of avian brood parasitism. Condor, 77: 250-271.
77. Rothstein, S.I. 1978. Geographic variation in nestling coloration of parasitic cowbirds. Auk, 95: 152-160.
78. Rothstein, S.I. 1982. Successes and failures in avian egg and nestling recognition with comments on the utility of optimal reasoning. Am. Zool., 22: 547-560.
79. Rothstein, S.I. 2001. Relic behaviours, coevolution and the retention versus loss of host defences after episodes of avian brood parasitism. Anim. Behav., 61: 95-107.
80. Rothstein, S.I. and Robinson, S.K., eds. 1998. Parasitic Birds and Their Hosts: Studies in Coevolution. New York: Oxford University Press.
81. Schuetz, J.G. 2005. Reduced growth but not survival of chicks with altered gape patterns: implications for the evolution of nestling similarity in a parasitic finch. Anim. Behav., 70: 839-848.
82. Sealy, S.G., Neudorf, D.L., Hobson, K.A. and Gill, S.A. 1998. Nest defense by potential hosts of the Brown-headed Cowbird: methodological approaches, benefits of defense, and coevolution. In Parasitic Birds and Their Hosts (S.I. Rothstein and S.K. Robinson, eds.), pp. 194-211. New York: Oxford University Press.
83. Servedio, M.R. and Lande, R. 2003. Coevolution of an avian host and its parasitic cuckoo. Evolution, 57: 1164-1175.
84. Sherman, P.W., Reeve, H.K. and Pfenning, D.W. 1997. Recognition systems. In Behavioural Ecology (J.R. Krebs and N.B. Davies, eds.), pp. 69-96. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific.
85. Slagsvold, T., Hansen, B.T., Johannessen, L.E. and Lifjeld, J.T. 2002. Mate choice and imprinting in birds studied by cross-fostering in the wild. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 269: 1449-1455.
86. Smith, N.G. 1968. The advantage of being parasitized. Nature, 219: 690-694.
87. Soler, J.J., Sorci, G., Soler, M. and Møller, A.P. 1999. Change in host rejection behavior mediated by the predatory behavior of its brood parasite. Behav. Ecol., 10: 275-280.
88. Soler, M. and Soler, J.J. 1999. Innate versus learned recognition of conspecifics in great spotted cuckoos Clamator glandarius. Anim. Cogn., 2: 97-102.
89. Soler, M., Soler, J.J., Martinez, J.G. and Møller, A.P. 1995a. Chick recognition and acceptance - a weakness in magpies exploited by the parasitic great spotted cuckoo. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 37: 243-248.
90. Soler, M., Soler, J.J., Martinez, J.G. and Møller, A.P. 1995b. Magpie host manipulation by great spotted cuckoos: evidence for an avian mafia? Evolution, 49: 770-775.
91. Soler, M., Soler, J.J., Martinez, J.G., Perez-Contreras, T. and Møller, A.P. 1998. Micro-evolutionary change and population dynamics of a brood parasite and its primary host: the intermittent arms race hypothesis. Oecologia, 117: 381-390.
92. Soler, M., Palomino, J.J., Martin-Vivaldi, M. and Soler, J.J. 2000. Lack of consistency in the response of rufous-tailed scrub robins Cercotrichas galactotes towards parasitic common cuckoo eggs. Ibis, 142: 139-158.
93. Sorenson, M.D. and Payne, R.B. 2001. A single ancient origin of brood parasitism in African finches: implications for host-parasite coevolution. Evolution, 55: 2550-2567.
94. Steyn, P. 1973. Some notes on the breeding biology of the striped cuckoo. Ostrich, 44: 163-169.
95. Stokke, E.G., Moksnes, A., Røskaft, E., Rudolfsen, G. and Honza, M. 1999. Rejection of artificial cuckoo (Cuculus canorus) eggs in relation to variation in egg appearance among reed warblers (Acrocephalus scirpaceus). Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 266: 1483-1488.
96. Stokke, E.G., Rudolfsen, G., Moksnes, A. and Røskaft E. 2004. Rejection of conspecific eggs in chaffinches: the effect of age and clutch characteristics. Ethology, 110: 459-470.
97. Székely, T., Webb, J.N., Houston, A.I. and McNamara, J.M. 1996. An evolutionary approach to offspring desertion in birds. Curr. Ornithol., 13: 271-331.
98. Takasu, F. 1998. Why do all host species not show defense against avian brood parasitism: evolutionary lag or equilibrium? Am. Nat., 151: 193-205.
99. Veen, T., Richardson, D.S., Blaakmeer, K. and Komdeur, J. 2000. Experimental evidence for innate predator recognition in the Seychelles warbler. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 267: 2253-2258.
100. Victoria, J.K. 1972. Clutch characteristics and egg discriminative ability of the African village weaver (Ploceus cucullatus). Ibis, 114: 367-376.
101. Webster, M.S. 1994: Interspecific brood parasitism of Montezuma oropendolas by giant cowbirds: parasitism or mutualism? Condor, 96: 794-798.
102. Wright, J. and Leonard, M.L., eds. 2002. The Evolution of Begging. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
103. Zahavi, A. and Zahavi, A. 1997. The Handicap Principle. Oxford: Oxford University Press.