Governing private foundations using the tax law

Journal of Accounting and Economics

Volumn 41, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 363-384

  Sansing, Richard ^a,b   Yetman, Robert ^c  

^a DARTMOUTH COLLEGE   (United States)

^b TILBURG UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Governance; Non profit organizations; Philanthropy; Private foundations

Indexed keywords

EID: 33746486834     PISSN: 01654101     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2005.03.003     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Belsley D., Kuh E., and Welsch R. Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity (1980), Wiley, New York
2. Brody E. Charitable endowments and the democratization of dynasty. Arizona Law Review 39 Fall (1997) 873-948
3. Cambridge Associates. Sustainable Payout for Foundations (2000), Cambridge Associates, Inc., Cambridge, MA
4. Craig J. In favor of five percent. Foundation News and Commentary 40 May/June (1999) 23-25
5. Deep, A., Frumkin, P., 2001. The foundation payout puzzle. Harvard University working paper.
6. Hansmann H. Why do universities have endowments?. Journal of Legal Studies 19 January (1990) 3-42
7. Mehrling P. Spending Policies for Foundations: The Case for Increased Grants Payout (1999), National Network of Grantmakers, San Diego, CA
8. Steuerle G. Pay-out Requirements for Foundations (1977), US Department of the Treasury, Washington, D.C
9. Stokeld F. EO proposals target charitable giving, higher education. Exempt Organization Tax Review 27 March (2000) 390-394
10. Troyer T. The 1969 private foundation law: historical perspective on its origins and underpinnings. The Exempt Organization Tax Review 27 January (2000) 52-65