Developing a managed learning environment using 'roundtables': An activity theoretic perspective

Interactive Learning Environments

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 209-225

  McAvinia, Claire ^a   Oliver, Martin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33746470732     PISSN: 10494820     EISSN: 17445191     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10494820512331383429     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Becher, T. (1989). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the culture of the disciplines. Buckingham: SRHE/OU Press.
2. Beetham, H. (2001). Career development of learning technology staff: Scoping study [On-line]. Available: http://sh.plym.ac.uk/eds/effects/jcalt-project/index.html
3. Condron, F., & Sutherland, S. (2002). Learning environments support in the UK further and higher education communities. JISC [On-line]. Available: http://www.jisc.ac.uk/index.cfm?name=mle_related_le
4. Conole, G., Oliver, M., Cook, J., Ravenscroft, A., & Currier, S. (2002). Multiple perspectives and theoretical dialogue in learning technology. In proceedings of ASCILITE 2002, New Zealand [On-line]. Available: http://homepages.unl.ac.uk/~cookj/alt_lt/ Multiple_perspectives_panel2.rtf
5. Engeström, J. (1998). Cultural-historical activity theory. Centre for Activity Theory and Developmental Work Research (CHAT & DWR) [On-line]. Available: http://www.edu.helsinki.fi/activity/
6. Frackmann, E. (1994). Administration. In G.M. Bull, C. Dallinga-Hunter, Y. Epelboin, E. Frackmann, & D. Jennings (Eds.), Information technology: Issues for higher education management (pp. 89-127). London: Jessica Kingsley.
7. Gilbert, S.W. (2001). Collaborative change: Improving teaching and learning with information technology. Washington: TLT Group.
8. Gornall, L. (1999). New professionals: Change and occupational roles in higher education. Perspectives, 3, 44-49.
9. Henkel, M. (2000). Academic identities and policy change in higher education. London: Jessica Kingsley.
10. Holmes, D. (1998). Some personal reflections on the role of administrators and managers in British universities. Perspectives, 2, 110-115.
11. Issroff, K., & Scanlon, E. (2002). Using technology in higher education: An activity theory perspective. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18, 77-83.
12. Jakupec, V., & Garrick, J. (Eds.). (2000). Flexible learning, human resource and organisational development. London: Routledge.
13. Jenkins, M., Browne, T., & Armitage, S. (2001). Management and implementation of virtual learning environments: A UCISA funded survey. Oxford: UCISA.
14. Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC). (2001). MLE information pack. London: JISC.
15. Kaptelinin, V., & Nardi, B.A. (1997). Activity theory: Basic concepts and applications. In proceedings of Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems [On-line]. Available: http://www.acm.org/sigchi/chi97/proceedings/tutorial/bn.htm
16. Kemp, C., Morss, K., North, P., Oliver, M., Peacock, S., Toole, M., & Van Der Velden, G. (2002). Roundtables: A collaborative change approach to promote the effective implementation of learning technologies. Edinburgh: Queen Margaret University College.
17. Kuutti, K. (1996). Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research. In B.A. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 17-44). Cambridge, MA: MIT.
18. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (2002). Legitimate peripheral participation in communities of practice. In M.R. Lea & K. Nicoll (Eds.), Distributed learning: Social and cultural approaches to practice (pp. 56-63). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
19. Morgan, W., Russell, A.L., & Ryan, M. (2002). Informed opportunism: Teaching for learning in uncertain contexts of distributed education. In M.R. Lea & K. Nicoll (Eds.), Distributed learning: Social and cultural approaches to practice (pp. 38-55). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
20. Nardi, B.A. (Ed.). (1996). Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21. National Committee of Inquiry into Higher Education (NCIHE). (1997). Higher education in the learning society. Norwich: Crown Copyright.
22. Oliver, M. (2002). What do learning technologists do? Innovations in Education and Training International, 39, 1-8.
23. Russell, D. (2002). Looking beyond the interface: Activity theory and distributed learning. In M.R. Lea & K. Nicoll (Eds.), Distributed learning: Social and cultural approaches to practice (pp. 64-82). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
24. Scanlon, E., & Issroff, K. (2001). Case studies revisited: What can Activity Theory offer? In proceedings of Euro-CSCL 2001 [On-line]. Available: http://www.mmi.unimaas.nl/euro-cscl/presentations.htm
25. Steel, J., & Hudson, A. (2001). Educational technology in learning and teaching: The perceptions and experiences of teaching staff. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 38, 103-111.
26. Whitchurch, C.M. (2000). The way we work now. Perspectives, 4, 59-60.