In vitro storage of cedar shoot cultures under minimal growth conditions

Plant Cell Reports

Volumn 25, Issue 7, 2006, Pages 636-642

  Renau Morata, Begoña ^a   Arrillaga, Isabel ^a   Segura, Juan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VALENCIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Cedrus; DNA methylation; In vitro storage; Minimal growth; RAPD

Indexed keywords

DNA METHYLATION; IN VITRO STORAGE; MINIMAL GROWTH; RAPD;

BIODIVERSITY; CHEMICAL REACTIONS; DNA; GROWTH KINETICS; PLANT CELL CULTURE; PLANTS (BOTANY);

SOFTWOODS;

ARTICLE; CEDRUS; CULTURE MEDIUM; DNA METHYLATION; DRUG EFFECT; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; IN VITRO STUDY; METHODOLOGY; PHYLOGENY; PLANT; RANDOM AMPLIFIED POLYMORPHIC DNA; TISSUE CULTURE TECHNIQUE;

CEDRUS; CULTURE MEDIA; DNA METHYLATION; PHYLOGENY; PLANT SHOOTS; RANDOM AMPLIFIED POLYMORPHIC DNA TECHNIQUE; TISSUE CULTURE TECHNIQUES;

BIODIVERSITY; CHEMICAL REACTIONS; GROWTH; NUCLEIC ACIDS; PLANTS;

CEDRUS; CEDRUS ATLANTICA; CEDRUS LIBANI;

EID: 33746463526     PISSN: 07217714     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00299-006-0129-2     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Armstrong J, Gibbs A, Peakall R, Weiler G (1996) RAPDistance Programs: Version 1.04 for the analysis of patterns of RAPD fragments. Australian National University, Canberra
2. Bessembinder JJE, Staritsky G, Zandvoort EA (1993) Long-term in vitro storage of Colocasia esculenta under minimal growth conditions. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 33:121-127
3. Blakesley D, Pask N, Henshaw GG, Fay MF (1996) Biotechnology and conservation of forest genetic resources: in vitro strategies and cryopreservation. Plant Growth Reg 20:11-16
4. Bourgin JP, Nitsch JP (1967) Obtention de Nicotiana haploides à partir d'étamines cultivées in vitro. Ann Physiol Vég 9:337-338
5. Engelmann F (1997) In vitro conservation methods. In: Callow JA, Ford-Lloyd BV, Newbury HJ (eds) Biotechnology and plant genetic resources, CAB International, Wallingford, UK, pp. 119-161
6. Farjon A, Page CN, Schellevis N (1993) A preliminary world list of threatened conifer taxa. Biodivers Conserv 2:304-326
7. Felsenstein J (1993) PHYLIP: Phylogeny Inference Package, version 3.5p. Department of Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle, USA
8. Hao YJ, Deng XX (2003) Genetically stable regeneration of apple plants from slow growth. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 72:253-260. DOI 10.1023/A:1022388728497
9. Hao YJ, Wen XP, Deng XX (2004) Genetic and epigenetic evaluations of citrus calluses recovered from slow-growth culture. J Plant Physiol 161:479-484. DOI 10.1078/0176-1617-01102
10. Larkin PJ, Scowcroft WR (1981) Somaclonal variations - a novel source of variability from cell cultures for plant improvement. Theor Appl Genet 60:197-214
11. Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15:473-497
12. Nebauer SG, Del Castillo Agudo L, Segura J (2000) An assessment of genetic relationships within the genus Digitalis based on PCR-generated RAPD markers. Theor Appl Genet 100:1209-1216. DOI 10.1007/s001220051426
13. Nei M, Li WH (1979) Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 76:5269-5273
14. Renau-Morata B, Nebauer SG, Sales E, Allainguillaume J, Caligari P, Segura J (2005a) Genetic diversity and structure of natural and managed opulations of Cedrus atlantica (Pinaceae) assessed using random amplified polymorphic DNA. Am J Bot 95:875-884
15. Renau-Morata B, Ollero J, Arrillaga I, Segura J (2005b) Factors influencing axillary shoot proliferation and adventitious budding in cedar. Tree Physiol 25:477-486
16. Renau-Morata B, Nebauer SG, Arrillaga I, Segura J (2005c) Assessments of somaclonal variation in micropropagated shoots of Cedrus: consequences of axillary bud breaking. Tree Gen Genom 1:3-10. DOI 10.1007/s11295-004-0001-x
17. Sala F, Labra M (2003) Somaclonal variation. In: Thomas B, Murphy DJ, Murria BG (eds) Enciclopedy of applied plant sciences, vol 3. Elsevier Academia Press, Amsterdam, pp. 1417-1422
18. Sarkar D, Naik PS (1998) Factors affecting minimal growth conservation of potato microplants in vitro. Euphytica 102:275-280. DOI 10.1023/A:1018309300121
19. Skoog F (1944) Growth and organ formation in tobacco tissue cultures. Am J Bot 31:19-24
20. Tukey JW (1953) Some selected quick and easy methods of statistical analysis. Trans N.Y. Academy of Science, series II, 16:88-97
21. Watt MP, Thokoane NL, Mycock D, Blakeway F (2000) In vitro storage of Eucalyptus grandis germplasm under minimal growth conditions. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 61:161-164. DOI 10.1023/A:1006447506869
22. Zandvoort EA, Hulshof MJH, Staritsky G (1994) In vitro storage of Xanthosoma spp. under minimal growth conditions. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 36:309-316