Safety envelope for load tolerance and its application to fatigue reliability design

Journal of Mechanical Design

Volumn 128, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 919-927

  Wang, Haoyu ^a   Kim, Nam H ^a   Kim, Yoon Jun ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^b CATERPILLAR INC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FITS AND TOLERANCES; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MONTE CARLO METHODS; RANDOM PROCESSES; RELIABILITY;

FATIGUE RELIABILITY; LOAD TOLERANCE; RANDOM VARIABLES; SAFETY ENVELOPE;

STRUCTURAL LOADS;

EID: 33746437097     PISSN: 10500472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1115/1.2204971     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Kwak, B. M., and Kim, J. H., 2002, "Concept of Allowable Load Set and Its Application for Evaluation of Structural Integrity," Mech. Struct. Mach., 30(2), pp. 213-247.
2. Isukapalli, S. S., Roy, A., and Georgopoulos, P. G., 2000, "Efficient Sensitivity/Uncertainty Analysis Using the Combined Stochastic Response Surface Method and Automated Differentiation: Application to Environmental and Biological Systems," Risk Anal., 20(5), pp. 591-602.
3. Isukapalli, S. S., Roy, A., and Georgopoulos, P. G., 1998, "Stochastic Response Surface Methods (SRSMs) for Uncertainty Propagation: Application to Environmental and Biological Systems," Risk Anal., 18(3), pp. 351-363.
4. Wu, Y.-T., 1994, "Computational Methods for Efficient Structural Reliability and Reliability Sensitivity Analysis," AIAA J., 32(8), pp. 1717-1723.
5. Liu, H., Chen, W., and Sudjianto, A., 2004, "Probability Sensitivity Analysis Methods for Design under Uncertainty," Tenth AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, Albany, NY., August 30-September 1.
6. Safe Technology, 2004, Fe-safe, Software Package, Ver. 5.1, Sheffield, England.
7. Yu, X. M., Chang, K. H., and Choi, K. K., 1998, "Probabilistic Structural Durability Prediction," AIAA J., 36(4), pp. 628-637.
8. Matsuishi, M., and Endo, T., 1968, "Fatigue of Metals Subjected to Varying Stress-Fatigue Lives Under Random Loading," Proceedings of the Kyushu District Meeting, JSEM, Fukuoka, Japan, pp. 37-40.
9. Miner, M. A., 1945, "Cumulative Damage in Fatigue," J. Appl. Mech., 12, pp. A159-A164.
10. Ghanem, R. G., and Spanos, P. D., 1991, Stochastic Finite Elements: A Spectral Approach, Springer-Verlag, New York.
11. Xiu, D., Lucor, D., Su., C.-H., and Karniadakis, G. E., 2002, "Stochastic Modeling of Flow-Structure Interactions Using Generalized Polynomial Chaos," J. Fluids Eng., 124(1), pp. 51-59.
12. Choi, S. K., Grandhi, R. V, Canfield, R. A., and Pettit, C. L., 2003, "Polynomial Chaos Expansion With Latin Hypercube Sampling for Predicting Response variability," 44th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Norfolk, VA. April 7-10.
13. Abramowitz, M., and Stegun, I. A., 1972, "Orthogonal Polynomials," Handbook of Mathematical Functions With Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables, 9th ed., Dover, New York, pp. 771-802.
14. Myers, R. H., and Montgomery, D. C., 1995, Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments. Wiley, New York.
15. Khuri, A. I., and Cornell, J. A., 1996, Response Surface: Design and Analysis, Dekker, New York.
16. Wang, G., 2003, "Adaptive Response Surface Method Using Inherited Latin Hypercube Design Points," ASME J. Mech. Des., 125(2), pp. 210-220.
17. Villadsen, J., and Michelsen, M. L., 1978, Solution of Differential Equation Models by Polynomial Approximation, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
18. Gautschi, W., 1996, Orthogonal Polynomials: Applications and Computation, Acta Numerica, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 45-119.
19. Cameron, R. H., and Martin W. T., 1947, "The Orthogonal Development of Nonlinear Functionals in Series of Fourier-Hermite Functionals," Ann. Math., 48, pp. 385-392.
20. Kim, N. H.. Wang, H., and Queipo, N. V., 2006, "Efficient Shape Optimization Under Uncertainty Using Polynomial Chaos Expansions and Local Sensitivities," AIAA J., 44(5), pp. 1112-1116.
21. Webster, M. D., Tatang, M. A., and McRae, G. J., 1996, "Application of the Probabilistic Collocation Method for an Uncertainty Analysis of a Simple Ocean Model," MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change.
22. Kim, N. H., Wang, H., and Queipo, N. V., 2005, "Adaptive Reduction of Design Variables Using Global Sensitivity in Reliability-Based Optimization," Int. J. Reliab. Safety (in press).
23. Metropolis, N., and Ulam, S., 1949, "The Monte Carlo Method." J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 44(247), pp. 335-341.
24. Rubinstein, R. Y., 1981, Simulation and the Monte Carlo Method, Wiley, New York.
25. Hasofer, A. M., and Lind, N. C., 1974, "Exact and Invariant Second-Moment Code Format." J. Eng. Mech., 100(1), pp. 111-121.
26. Rackwitz, R., 2000, "Reliability Analysis-Past, Present and Future." Eighth ASCE Specialty Conference on Probabilistic Mechanics and Structure Reliability, Notre Dame, IN, July 24-26.
27. Chiralaksanakul, A., and Mahadevan, S., 2005. "First-Order Approximation Methods in Reliability-Based Design Optimization," ASME J. Mech. Des., 127(5), pp. 851-857.
28. Karamchandani, A., and Cornell, C. A., 1992, "Sensitivity Estimation Within First and Second Order Reliability Methods," Struct. Safety, 11, pp. 95-107.
29. Devroye, L., 1986, Nonuniform Random Variate Generation, Springer-Verlag, New York.
30. Allgower, E. L., and Georg, K., 1990, Numerical Continuation Methods: An Introduction, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.