Development of the Stroke-unit Discharge Guideline: Choice of assessment instruments for prediction in the subacute phase post-stroke

International Journal of Rehabilitation Research

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 1-8

  Meijer, Ronald ^a   Van Limbeek, Jacques ^b   De Haan, Rob ^c  

^a Rehabilitation Centre Groot Klimmendaal   (Netherlands)

^b SMK Research   (Netherlands)

^c ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Assessment instruments; Prognosis; Stroke

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING; DATABASE SYSTEMS; MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS; RELIABILITY; WORLD WIDE WEB;

ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENTS; HOSPITAL STROKE UNIT; PROGNOSIS; PROGNOSTIC FACTORS; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; STROKE-UNIT DISCHARGE GUIDELINE (SDG);

RECORDING INSTRUMENTS;

ARTICLE; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; HUMAN; INTERNET; NETHERLANDS; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; PSYCHOMETRY; RELIABILITY; STROKE; STROKE UNIT; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; VALIDATION PROCESS; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CLASSIFICATION; DISABILITY; HOSPITALIZATION; INTENSIVE CARE; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARD; VALIDATION STUDY;

CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; DISABILITY EVALUATION; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; GUIDELINES; HUMANS; PATIENT DISCHARGE; PROGNOSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SUBACUTE CARE;

EID: 33746421592     PISSN: 03425282     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.mrr.0000175269.59788.41     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Agrell BM, Dehlin OI, Dahlgren CJ (1997). Neglect in elderly stroke patients: a comparison of five tests. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 51:295-300.
2. Anthony JC, LeResche L, Niaz U, VonKorff MR, Folstein MF (1982). Limits of the mini-mental state as a screening test for dementia and delirium among hospital patients. Psychol Med 12:397-408.
3. Berkman LF, Lyme SL (1979). Social networks, host resistance, and mortality: a nine year follow-up study of Alameda County residents. Am J Epidemiol 109:186-204.
4. Bernstein SJ, Laouri M, Hilborne LH, Leape LL, Kahan JP, Park RE, et al. (1992). Coronary angiography: a literature review and ratings of appropriateness and necessity. Santa Monica: RAND. Report JRA-03.
5. Bowling A (1995). Measuring disease. A review of disease-specific quality of life measurement scales. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
6. Cockrell JR, Folstein MF (1988). Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE). Psychopharmacology 24:689-692.
7. Collin C, Wade DT (1990). Assessing motor impairment after stroke: a pilot reliability study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 53:576-579.
8. Collin C, Wade DT, Davies S, Horne V (1988). The Barthel ADL Index: a reliability study. Int Disabil Stud 10:61-63.
9. Crow JL, Harmeling BC (2002). Development of a consensus and evidence-based standardised clinical assessment and record form for neurological inpatients: the Neuro Dataset. Physiotherapy 88:33-46.
10. Crum RM, Anthony JC, Bassett SS, Folstein MF (1993). Population-based norms for the mini-mental state examination by age and educational level. J Am Med Assoc 18:2386-2391.
11. De Bleser R, Willmes K, Graetz P, Hagoort P (1991). De Akense Afasie Test (2): Psychometrische kenmerken van de Nederlandstalige versie [in Dutch]. Logopedics Foniatrics 63:207-217.
12. de Haan R, Limburg M, Schuling J, Broeshart J, Jonkers L, Zuylen van P (1993). Clinimetric evaluation of the Barthel Index; a measure of disability in the activities of daily living [in Dutch]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 137:917-921.
13. Demeurisse G, Demol O, Robaye E (1980). Motor evaluation in vascular hemiplegia. Eur Neurol 19:382-389.
14. Dittmar SS, Gresham GE (1997). Functional assessment and outcome measures for the rehabilitation health professional. New York: Aspen.
15. Essink-Bot M-L, Krabbe PFM, Gonsel GJ, Aaronson NK (1997). An empirical comparison of four generic health status measures: The Nottingham Health Profile, the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-Form Health Survey, the COOP/WONCA charts, and the EuroQol instrument. Med Care 35: 522-537.
16. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR (1975). Mini-Mental State: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 12:189-198.
17. Franchignoni FP, Tesio L, Ricupero C, Martino MT (1997). Trunk control test as an early predictor of stroke rehabilitation outcome. Stroke 28:1382-1385.
18. Goossen W, Meijer R, Kruk van der P, Reuser L (2003). Specifications stroke chain information system. Nationaal ICT Instituut voor de Zorg (NICTIZ) [in Dutch]. Leidschendam, The Netherlands.
19. Granger CV, Albrecht GL, Hamilton BB (1979). Outcome of comprehensive medical rehabilitation: measurement by PULSES Profile and the Barthel Index. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 60:145-154.
20. Halligan P, Wilson B, Cockburn J (1990). A short screening test for visual neglect in stroke patients. Int Disabil Stud 12:95-99.
21. Halligan PW, Marshall JC, Wade DT (1989). Visuospatial neglect: underlying factors and test sensitivity. Lancet ii:908-910.
22. Hodges JR (1999). Cognitive assessment for clinicians. Oxford: Oxford Medical Publications.
23. König-Zahn C (1993). The measurement of the state of health, description and evaluation of questionnaires (3 volumes) [in Dutch]. Assen: Van Gorcum.
24. Kuzma JW, Namerow NS, Tourtellotte WW, Sibley WA, Kurtzke JF, Rose AS, et al. (1969). An assessment of the reliability of three methods used in evaluating the status of multiple sclerosis patients. J Chronic Dis 21:803-814.
25. Mahoney FI, Barthel DW (1965). Functional Evaluation: The Barthel Index. Md State Med J 14:61-65.
26. McDowell I, Newell C (1996). Measuring health: a guide to rating scales and questionnaires. New York: Oxford University Press.
27. McHorney CA, Ware JE, Roger W, Raczek AE, Lu JFR (1992). The validity and relative precision of MOS short- and long-form health status scales and Dartmouth COOP charts. Med Care 30 (Suppl):MS253-MS265.
28. Meijer R, Ihnenfeldt DS, Groot de IJM, Limbeek van J, Vermeulen M, Haan de RJ (2003a). Prognostic factors for ambulation and activities of daily living in the subacute phase after stroke. A systematic review of the literature. Clin Rehabil 17:119-129.
29. Meijer R, Ihnenfeldt DS, Limbeek van J, Vermeulen M, Haan de RJ (2003b). Prognostic factors in the subacute phase after stroke for the future residence after one year. A systematic review of the literature. Clin Rehabil 17:512-520.
30. Meijer R, Ihnenfeldt DS, Vermeulen M, Haan de RJ, Limbeek van J (2003c). The use of a Modified Delphi procedure for the determination of 26 prognostic factors in the subacute stage of stroke. Int J Rehabil Res 26:265-271.
31. Meijer R, Limbeek van J, Kriek B, Ihnenfeldt DS, Vermeulen M, Haan de R (2004). Prognostic social factors in the subacute phase after a stroke for the discharge destination from the hospital stroke-unit. A systematic review of the literature. Disabil Rehabil 26:191-197.
32. Meyboom-de Jong B, Smith RJA (1990). Studies with the Dartmouth COOP Charts in general practice: comparison with the Nottingham Health Profile and the General Health Questionnaire. In: WONCA classification committee: functional ftatus measurement in primary care. New York: Springer Verlag.
33. Mulrow CD, Oxman AD (1999). Cochrane Collaboration Handbook. [updated September 1997]. In: The Cochrane library. Oxford: Update Software.
34. Nelson E, Wasson J, Kirk J, Keller A, Clark D, Dietrich A, et al. (1987). Assessment of function in routine clinical practice: Description of the COOP chart method and preliminary findings. J Chronic Dis 40 (Suppl 1):55S-63S.
35. Nelson EC, Landgraf JM, Hays RD, Kirk JW, Wasson JH, Keller A, et al. (1990a). The COOP Function Charts: a system to measure patient function in physicians' office. In: WONCA classification committee: functional status measurement in primary care. New York: Springer Verlag.
36. Nelson EC, Landgraf JM, Hays RD, Wasson JH, Kirk JW (1990b). The functional status of patients: how can it be measured in physicians' offices? Med Care 28:1111-1126.
37. Nelson EC, Wasson JH, Johnson DJ, Hays RD (1996). Dartmouth COOP Functional Health Assessment Charts: brief measures for clinical practice. http://www.dartmouth.edu/Bcoopproj/more_coop.html.
38. Radloff LS (1977). The CES-D Scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas 1:365-411.
39. Stave K, Jodalen H. (2002). Reliability and validity of the COOP/WONCA health status measure in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Qual Life Res 11:527-533.
40. Streiner DL, Norman GR (1999). Health measurement scales. A practical guide to their development and use. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford Medical Publications.
41. Symposium recommendations for methodology in stroke outcome research. (1990). Task Force on Stroke Impairment, Task Force on Stroke Disability, and Task Force on Stroke Handicap. Stroke 21 (Suppl):II68-II73.
42. Teasdale G, Jennett B (1974). Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet ii:81-83.
43. van Heugten CM, Dekker J, Deelman BG, Stehmann-Saris FC, Kinebanian A (1999). A Diagnostic test for apraxia in stroke patients: internal consistency and diagnostic value. Clin Neuropsychol 13:182-192.
44. van Straten A, Meulen JHP, van der Bos GAM, van den Limburg M (1997). Length of hospital stay and discharge delays in stroke patients. Stroke 28:137-140.
45. Villaneuva NE, Bell L (1993). Neurosurgical critical care nursing: head injury. In: Greenberg J, editor. Handbook of head and spine trauma. New York: Marcel Dekker. pp. 341-349.
46. Wade DT (1994). Measurement in neurological rehabilitation. Oxford: Oxford Medical Publications.
47. Wade DT, Hewer RL (1987). Functional abilities after stroke: measurement, natural history and prognosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 50:177-182.
48. Wasson JH, Kairys SW, Nelson EC, Kalishman N, Baribeau P (1994). A short survey for assessing health and social problems of adolescents. J Fam Pract 38:489-494.
49. Weel Van C (1993). Functional status in primary care: COOP/WONCA charts. Disabil Rehabil 15:96-101.
50. Weniger D, Willmes K, Huber W, Poeck K (1981). Der Aachener Aphasie Test. Reliabilität und Auswertungsobjektivität [in German]. Nervenarzt 52:269-277.
51. Zwinkels A, Geusgens C, Sande Peter van de, Heugten C van (2004). Assessment of apraxia: inter-rater reliability of a new apraxia test, association between apraxia and other cognitive deficits and prevalence of apraxia in a rehabilitation setting. Clin Rehabil 18:819-827.