Long-term results with the Wagner metal-on-metal hip resurfacing prosthesis

HIP International

Volumn 16, Issue SUPPL. 4, 2006, Pages

  Bohm R ^a   Schraml, Annemarie ^a   Schuh, A ^b  

^a Wichernhaus Orthopaedic Clinic   (Germany)

^b Research Unit Orthopaedics and Surgery   (Germany)

Author keywords

Anterior approach; Articulation; Cemented; Metal on metal; Resurfacing prosthesis; Uncemented; Wagner

Indexed keywords

METAL;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AVASCULAR NECROSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HIP DISEASE; HIP DYSPLASIA; HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS; HIP RADIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; REOPERATION; RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS; SCORING SYSTEM; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TIME; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33746419628     PISSN: 11207000     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5301/hip.2008.1459     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Allison C. Minimally invasive hip resurfacing. Issues Emerg Health Technol 2005; 65: 1-4.
2. Back DL, Young DA, Shimmin AJ. How do serum cobalt and chromium levels change after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005; 438: 177-81.
3. Beaulé PE, Antoniades J. Patient selection and surgical technique for surface arthroplasty of the hip. Orthop Clin North Am 2005; 36: 177-85.
4. Beaulé PE, Dorey FJ, LeDuff M, Gruen T, Amstutz HC. Risk factors affecting outcome of metal-on-metal surface arthroplasty of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004; 418: 87-93.
5. Beaulé PE, Le Duff M, Campbell P, Dorey FJ, Park SH, Amstutz HC. Metal-on-metal surface arthroplasty with a cemented femoral component: a 7-10 year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 2004; 19 (suppl 3): S17-22.
6. Daniel J, Pynsent PB, McMinn DJ. Metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip in patients under the age of 55 years with osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004; 86: 177-84.
7. Duijsens AW, Keizer S, Vliet-Vlieland T, Nelissen RG. Resurfacing hip prostheses revisited: failure analysis during a 16-year follow-up. Int Orthop 2005; 29: 224-8.
8. Fowble VA, Schuh A, Hoke R, Bitsch RG, Beaulé PE. Clinical correlation of femoral component migration in hip resurfacing arthroplasty analyzed by Einzel-Bild-Röntgen-analyse-femoral component analysis. Orthop Clin North Am 2005; 36: 243-50.
9. Knecht A, Witzleb WC, Beichler T, Günther KP. Functional results after surface replacement of the hip: comparison between dysplasia and idiopathic osteoarthritis. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 2004; 142: 279-85.
10. Knecht A, Witzleb WC, Gunther KP. Resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip. Der Orthopäde 2005; 34: 79-89.
11. Little CP, Ruiz AL, Harding IJ, et al. Osteonecrosis in retrieved femoral heads after failed resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005; 87: 320-3.
12. Mont MA, Rajadhyaksha AD, Hungerford DS. Outcomes of limited femoral resurfacing arthroplasty compared with total hip arthroplasty for osteonecrosis of the femoral head. J Arthroplasty 2001; 16 (suppl 1): S134-9.
13. Schmalzried TP, Fowble VA, Ure KJ, Amstutz HC. Metal on metal surface replacement of the hip. Technique, fixation, and early results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1996; 329 (suppl): S106-14.
14. Schmalzried TP, Silva M, de la Rosa MA, Choi ES, Fowble VA. Optimizing patient selection and outcomes with total hip resurfacing. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005; 441: 200-4.
15. Schmalzried TP. How I choose a bearing surface for my patients. J Arthroplasty 2004; 19 (suppl 3): S50-3.
16. Shimmin AJ, Back D. Femoral neck fractures following Birmingham hip resurfacing: a national review of 50 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005; 87: 463-4.
17. Shimmin AJ, Bare J, Back DL. Complications associated with hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 2005; 36: 187-93.
18. Treacy RB, McBryde CW, Pynsent PB. Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty. A minimum follow-up of five years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005; 87: 167-70.
19. Howie DW, Campbell D, McGee M, Cornish BL. Wagner resurfacing hip arthroplasty. The results of one hundred consecutive arthroplasties after eight to ten years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1990; 72: 708-14.
20. Wiadrowski TP, McGee M, Cornish BL, Howie DW. Peripheral wear of Wagner resurfacing hip arthroplasty acetabular components. J Arthroplasty 1991; 6: 103-7.
21. Wagner H. Surface replacement arthroplasty of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1978; 134: 102-30.
22. Franzen H, Mjoberg B, Rydholm U. Metal backing improves the survival of surface replacement of the hip. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1993; 112: 257-9.
23. Merle d'Aubigné R, Postel M. Functional results of arthroplasty with acrylic prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1954; 36: 451-75.
24. DeLee JG, Charnley J. Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1976; 121: 20-32.
25. Brooker AF, Bowerman JW, Robinson RA, Riley LH. Ectopic ossification following total hip arthroplasty. Incidence and method of classification. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1973; 55: 1629-32.
26. Nork SE, Schar M, Pfander G, et al. Anatomic considerations for the choice of surgical approach for hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 2005; 36: 163-70.
27. Buechel FF, Drucker D, Jasty M, Jiranek W, Harris WH. Osteolysis around uncemented acetabular components of cobalt-chrome surface replacement hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994; 298: 202-11.