The fixed-links model in combination with the polynomial function as a tool for investigating choice reaction time data

Structural Equation Modeling

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 403-419

  Schweizer, Karl ^a  

^a GOETHE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPONENT BASED; LATENT VARIABLE; POLYNOMIAL FUNCTIONS; QUADRATIC COMPONENTS; WEIGHTED SUM;

EQUIVALENCE CLASSES;

FUNCTIONS;

EID: 33746419602     PISSN: 10705511     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15328007sem1303_4     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Beauducel, A., & Brocke, B. (1993). Intelligence and speed of information processing: Further results and questions on Hick's paradigm and beyond. Personality and Individual Differences, 15, 627-636.
2. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
3. Donders, F. C. (1868). Die Schnelligkeit psychischer Prozesse [Speed of mental processes]. Archiv für Anatomie und Physiologie, 657-681.
4. Duncan, T. E., & Duncan, S. C. (1995). Modeling the processes of development via latent variable growth curve methodology. Structural Equation Modeling, 2, 187-213.
5. Duncan, T. E., & Duncan, S. C. (2004). An introduction to latent growth curve modeling. Behavior Therapy, 35, 333-363.
6. Duncan, T. E., Duncan, S. C., Okut, H., Strycker, L. A., & Li, F. (2002). An extension of the general latent variable growth modeling framework to four levels of the hierarchy. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 303-326.
7. Ferrer, E., Hamagami, F., & McArdle, J. J. (2004). Modeling latent growth curves with incomplete data using different types of structural equation modeling and multilevel software. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 452-483.
8. Ferrer, E., & McArdle, J. J. (2004). An experimental analysis of dynamic hypotheses about cognitive abilities and achievement from childhood to early adulthood. Developmental Psychology, 40, 935-952.
9. Hancock, G. R., Kuo, W.-L., & Lawrence, F. R. (2001). An illustration of second-order latent growth models. Structural Equation Modeling, 8, 470-489.
10. Hick, W.E. (1952). On the rate of gain of information. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 4, 11-26.
11. Jensen, A. R. (1987a). Individual differences in the Hick paradigm. In P. A. Veraon (Ed.), Speed of information processing and intelligence. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
12. Jensen, A. R. (1987b). Process differences and individual differences in some cognitive tasks. Intelligence, 11, 107-136.
13. Jensen, A. R. (1992). The importance of intraindividual variation in reaction time. Personality and Individual Differences, 8, 869-881.
14. Jensen, A. R., & Munro, E. (1979). Reaction time, movement time, and intelligence. Intelligence, 3, 121-126.
15. Jöreskog, K. G. (1973). A general method for estimating the linear structural equation system. In A. S. Goldberg & O. D. Duncan (Eds.), Structural equation models in the social sciences. New York: Seminar Press.
16. Keesling, W. (1972). Maximum likelihood approaches to causal flow analysis. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Chicago, Chicago.
17. McArdle, J. J. (1986). Latent variable growth within behavior genetic models. Behavior Genetics, 16, 163-200.
18. McArdle, J. J. (1988). Growth curve analysis in contemporary psychological research. In J. R. Nesselroade & R. B. Cattell (Eds.), Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology (2nd ed., pp. 561-614). New York: Plenum.
19. McArdle, J. J. (1989). A structural modeling experiment with multiple growth functions. In R. Kanfer, P. L. Ackerman, & R. Cudeck (Eds.), Abilities, motivation, and methodology: The Minnesota Symposium on Learning and Individual Differences (pp. 71-117). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
20. McArdle, J. J., & Epstein, D. (1987). Latent growth curves within developmental structural equation models. Child Development, 58, 110-133.
21. Meredith, W., & Tisak, J. (1984, June). Tuckerizing curves. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society, Santa Barbara, CA.
22. Meredith, W., & Tisak, J. (1990). Latent curve analysis. Psychometrika, 55, 107-122.
23. Neubauer, A. C. (1990). Speed of information processing in the Hick paradigm and response latencies in a psychometric intelligence test. Personality and Individual Differences, 11, 147-152.
24. Neubauer, A. C., Riemann, R., Mayer, R., & Angleitner, A. (1997). Intelligence and reaction times in the Hick, Sternberg and Posner paradigms. Personality and Individual Differences, 22, 885-894.
25. Rao, C. R. (1958). Some statistical methods for comparisons of growth curves. Biometrics, 14, 1-17.
26. Raykov, T. (2005). Analysis of longitudinal studies with missing data using covariance structure modeling with full-information maximum likelihood. Structural Equation Modeling, 12, 493-505.
27. Roth, E. (1964). Die Geschwindigkeit der Verarbeitung von Information und ihr Zusammenhang mit der Intelligenz [Speed of information processing and its relationship with intelligence]. Zeitschrift für Exerimentelle und Angewandte Psychologie, 11, 616-622.
28. Scher, A. M., Young, A. C., & Meredith, W. M. (1960). Factor analysis of the electrocardiograph. Circulation Research, 8, 519-526.
29. Stoel, R. O., van den Wittenboer, G., & Hox, J. (2004). Including time-invariant covariates in the latent growth curve model. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 155-167.
30. Tucker, L. R. (1958). Determination of parameters of a functional relation by factor analysis. Psychometrika, 23, 19-23.
31. Vernon, P. A. (1981). Reaction time and intelligence in the mentally retarded. Intelligence, 5, 345-355.
32. Wiley, D. E. (1973). The identification problem for structural equation models with unmeasured variables. In A. S. Goldberg & O. D. Duncan (Eds.), Structural equation models in the social sciences. New York: Seminar Press.