Two-step cluster procedure after principal component analysis identifies sperm subpopulations in canine ejaculates and its relation to cryoresistance

Journal of Andrology

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 596-603

  Núñez Martínez, Ivan ^a   Morán, Jose María ^a   Peña, Fernando J ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EXTREMADURA   (Spain)

^b Avd de la Universidad s/n   (Spain)

Author keywords

Computer assisted sperm analysis; Dog

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CELL DISRUPTION; CELL SUBPOPULATION; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COLD TOLERANCE; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOG; FREEZING; MALE; MORPHOMETRICS; NONHUMAN; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; SCORING SYSTEM; SEMEN ANALYSIS; SPERM; SPERMATOZOON; SPERMATOZOON MOTILITY; THAWING; VELOCITY;

ANIMALS; CRYOPRESERVATION; DOGS; EJACULATION; MALE; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; SEMEN PRESERVATION; SPERM MOTILITY; SPERMATOZOA;

EID: 33746415659     PISSN: 01963635     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2164/jandrol.05153     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Abaigar T, Holt WV, Harrison RAP, del Barrio G. Sperm subpopulations in boar (Sus scrofa) and gazelle (Gazella dama mhorr) semen as revealed by pattern analysis of computer assisted motility assessments. Biol Reprod. 1999;60:32-41.
2. Agarwal A, Sharma RK, Nelson DR. New semen quality scores developed by principal component analysis of semen characteristics. J Androl. 2003;24:343-352.
3. Bajpai M, Doncel GF. Involvement of tyrosine kinase and camp dependent kinase cross-talk in the regulation of human sperm motility. Reproduction. 2003;126:183-195.
4. Buendia P, Soler C, Paolicchi F, Gago G, Urquieta B, Pérez Sánchez F, Bustos Obregon E. Morphometric characterization and classification of alpaca sperm heads using the sperm class analyzer system. Theriogenohgy. 2002;57:1207-1218.
5. de Geyter Ch, de Geiter M, Koppers B, Nieschlag. Diagnostic accuracy of computer assisted sperm motion analysis. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:2512-2520.
6. ESHRE Andrology Special Interest Group. Guidelines on the application of CASA technology in the analysis of spermatozoa. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:142-145.
7. Holt C, Holt WV, Moore HDM, Reed HCB, Curnock RM. Objectively measured boar sperm motility parameters correlate with the outcomes of on farm inseminations: results of two fertility trials. J Androl. 1997;18:312-323.
8. Holt W. Can we predict fertility rates? Making sense of sperm motility. Reprod Dornest Anim. 1996;31:17-24.
9. Holt WV, Van Look KJW. Concepts in sperm heterogeneity, sperm selection and sperm competition as biological foundations for laboratory tests of semen quality. Reproduction. 2004;127:527-535.
10. Larsen L, Scheike T, Kold Jensen L, Peter Bonde J, Ernst E, Henrik Hjollund N, Zhou Y, Erik Skakkebaek N, Giwercman A. Danish first pregnancy planner study team. Computer assisted semen analysis parameters as predictors for fertility of men from the general population. Hum Reprod. 2000; 15:1562-1567.
11. Martinez-Pastor F, García-Macias V, Alvarez M, Herráez P, Anel L, de Paz P. Sperm subpopulation in Iberian red deer epidydimal sperm and their changes through the cryopreservation process. Biol Reprod. 2005;72:316-327.
12. Mazur P. Freezing of living cells: mechanism and implications. Am J Physiol (Cell Physiol). 1984;16:C125-C142.
13. Mazur P, Koshimoto CH. Is intracellular ice formation the cause of death of mouse sperm frozen at high cooling rates? Biol Reprod. 2002;66:1485-1490.
14. Mortimer ST. CASA-practical aspects. J Androl. 2000;21:514-524.
15. Peña A, Linde-Forsberg CB. Effect of spermatozoal concentration and post-thaw dilution rate on survival after thawing of dog spermatozoa. Theriogenology. 2000;54:703-718.
16. Peña AI. Canine fresh and cryopreserved evaluation. Anim Reprod Sci. 2004;82/83:209-224.
17. Peña FJ, Saravia F, Garcia Herreros M, Nuñez-Martinez I, Tapia JA, Johannisson A, Wallgren M, Rodriguez Martinez H. Identification of sperm morphometric subpopulations in two different portions of the boar ejaculate and its relation to post thaw quality. J Androl. 2005;26:716-723.
18. Quintero-Moreno A, Miró J, Rigau T, Rodriguez Gil JE. Identification of sperm subpopulations with specific motility characteristics in stallion ejaculates. Theriogenology. 2003;59:1973-1990.
19. Rathi R, Colenbrander B, Bevers BB, Gadella BM. Evaluation of in vitro capacitation of stallion spermatozoa. Biol Reprod. 2001;65:462-470.
20. Rodriguez Martinez H. Laboratory assessment and prediction of fertility: still utopia? Reprod Dornest Anim. 2003;38:312-318.
21. Versiegen J, Iguer-Ouada M, Onclin K. Computer assisted semen analyzers in andrology research and veterinary practice. Theriogenology. 2002;57:149-179.