Lack of agreement between thermodilution and fick methods in the measurement of cardiac output

Journal of Intensive Care Medicine

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 93-98

  Baylor, Peter ^a  

^a VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Agreement; Cardiac output

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CALORIMETRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EVALUATION; HEART FUNCTION TEST; HEART OUTPUT; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE; METHODOLOGY; OXYGEN CONSUMPTION; REPRODUCIBILITY; THERMODILUTION;

CALORIMETRY, INDIRECT; CARDIAC OUTPUT; CRITICAL CARE; HEART FUNCTION TESTS; HUMANS; OXYGEN CONSUMPTION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; THERMODILUTION;

EID: 33746414431     PISSN: 08850666     EISSN: 15251489     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0885066605285234     Document Type: Review

References (15)

1. Bland JM, Altaian DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986; 1: 307-310. (Pubitemid 16134762)
2. Linton R, Band D, O'Brien T, et al. Lithium dilution cardiac output measurement: a comparison with thermodilution. Crit Care Med. 1997; 25: 1796-1800. (Pubitemid 27483956)
3. Axler O. Tousignant C, Thompson CR, et al. Comparison of transesophageal echocardiographic, Fick, and tnermodilution cardiac output in critically| ill patients. J Clin Care. 1996; 11: 109-116.
4. Eagle KA et al.: ACC/AHA guideline update for perioperative cardiovascular evaluation for noncardiac surgeryexecutive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1966 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002; 39: 542-553. (Pubitemid 34117516)
5. Sageman WS, Amundson DE. Thoracic electrical bioimpedance measurement of cardiac output in postaortocoronary bypass patients. Crit Care Med. 1993; 21: 1139-1142. (Pubitemid 23226470)
6. Ryan T, Page R, Bouchier-Hayes D, et al. Transesophageal pulsed wave Doppler measurement of cardiac output, during major vascular surgery: comparison with thermodilution technique. Br J Anaesth. 1992; 69: 101-104.
7. Estagnasie P, Djedaini K, Mier L, et al. Measurement of cardiac output by transesophageal echocardiography in mechanically ventilated patients: comparison with thermodilution. Intensive Care Med. 1997; 23: 753-759. (Pubitemid 27379923)
8. Dhingra VK, Fenwick JC, Walley KR, et al. Lack of agreement between thermodilution and Fick cardiac output in critically ill patients. Chest. 2002; 122: 990-997.
9. Lefrant J-Y, Bruelle P, Ripart J, et al. Cardiac, output measurement in critically ill patients: comparison of continuous and conventional thermodilution techniques. Can J Anaesth. 1995; 42: 972-976.
10. Nishikawa T, Dohi S. Errors in the measurement of cardiac output by thermodilution. Can J Anaesth. 1993; 40: 142-153. (Pubitemid 23094716)
11. Stetz CW, Miller RG, Kelly GE, et al. Reliability of the thermodilution method in the determination of cardiac output in clinical practice. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1982; 126: 1001-1004 (Pubitemid 13202250)
12. Cheatham ML, Nelson LD, Chang MC, Safcsak K. Right ventricular end -diastolic volume index as a predictor of preload status in patients on positive end-expiratory pressure. Crit Care Med. 1988; 26: 1801-1806.
13. Diebel LN, Wilson RF, Tagett MG, Kline RA. End-diastolic volume: a better indicator of preload in the critically ill. Arch Surg. 1992; 127: 817-822.
14. Latson TW, Whitten CW, O'Flaherty D. Ventilation, thermal noise, and errors in cardiac output measurement after cardiopulmonary bypass. Anesthesiology. 1993; 79: 1233-1243. (Pubitemid 24005770)
15. Jansen JR, Vesprille A. Improvement of cardiac output estimation by the thermodilution method during mechanical ventilation. Intensive Care Med. 1986; 12: 71-79. (Pubitemid 16162642)