The effect of initial pattern on competitive exclusion

Community Ecology

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 23-33

  Racz E V P ^a   Karsai, J ^b  

^a SZÉCHENYI ISTVÁN UNIVERSITY   (Hungary)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SZEGED   (Hungary)

Author keywords

Cellular automata; Colonization; Competition; Local aggregation; Spatiotemporal pattern

Indexed keywords

CELLULAR AUTOMATON; COLONIZATION; COMPETITION (ECOLOGY); SIMULATION; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 33746410138     PISSN: 15858553     EISSN: 15882756     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1556/ComEc.7.2006.1.3     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Amarasekare, P. 2003. Competitive coexistence in spatially structured environments: a synthesis. Ecology Letters 6:1109-1122.
2. Bolker, B. M. and S. W. Pacala. 1997. Using moment equations to understand stochastically driven spatial pattern formation in ecological systems. Theor. Popul. Biol. 52:179-197.
3. Bolker, B. M. and S. W. Pacala. 1999. Spatial moment equations for plant competition: understanding spatial strategies and the advantages of short dispersal. Am. Nat. 153:575-602.
4. Bolker, B. M., S. W. Pacala and C. Neuhauser. 2003. Spatial dynamics in model plant communities: What do we really know? Am. Nat. 162:135-148.
5. Burks, A. W. 1970. Von Neumann's self-reproducting automata. In: A. W. Burks (ed), Essays on Cellular Automata. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, pp. 3-64.
6. Chesson, P. and C. Neuhauser. 2002. Intraspecific aggregation and species coexistence. TREE 17: 210-211.
7. Crawley, M. J. and R. M. May. 1987. Population dynamics and plant community structure: competition between annuals and perennials. J. Theor. Biol. 125: 475-489.
8. Czárán, T. 1998. Spatiotemporal Models of Population and Community Dynamics. Chapman & Hall, London.
9. Dieckman, U., R. Law and J. A. J. Metz (eds.), 2000. The Geometry of Ecological Interactions. Simplifying Spatial Complexity. Cambridge University Press, UK.
10. Doncaster, C. P., G. E. Pound and S. J. Cox. 2003. Dynamics of regional coexistence for more or less equal competitors. J. Anim. Ecol. 72:116-126.
11. Durrett, R. and S. Levin. 1998. Spatial aspects of interspecific competition. Theor. Popul. Biol. 53:30-43.
12. Dytham, C. 1994. Habitat destruction and competitive coexistence: a cellular model. J. Anim. Ecol. 63:490-491.
13. Dytham, C. 1995. The effect of habitat destruction pattern on species persistence: a cellular model. Oikos 74:340-344.
14. Gandhi, A., S. Levin and S. Orszag. 1998. "Critical slowing down" in time-to-extiniction: an example of critical phenomena in ecology. J. theor. Biol. 192:363-376.
15. Gandhi, A., S. Levin and S. Orszag. 1999. Nucleation and relaxation from meta-stability in spatial ecological models. J. theor. Biol. 200:121-146.
16. Gause, G. F. 1934. The Struggle for Existence. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
17. Gaylord, R. J. and K. Nishidate. 1996. Modeling Nature: Cellular Automata Simulations with Mathematica. Springer, New York.
18. Holmes, E. E. and H. B. Wilson. 1998. Running from trouble: long-distance dispersal and the competitive coexistence of inferior species. Am. Nat. 151:578-586.
19. Ittzés, P., É. Jakó, Á. Kun, and J. Podani. 2005. A discrete mathematical method for the analysis of spatial pattern. Community Ecology 6:177-190.
20. Ives, A. R. 1988. Aggregation and the coexistence of competitors. Ann. Zool. Fennici 25:75-88.
21. Kneitel, J.M. and J. M. Chase. 2004. Trade-offs in community ecology: linking spatial scales and species coexistence. Ecology Letters 7:69-90.
22. Korniss, G. and T. Caraco. 2005. Spatial dynamics of invasion: the geometry of introduced species. J. theor Biol. 233: 137-150.
23. Kun, Á. and B. Oborny. 2003. Survival and competition of clonal plant populations in spatially and temporally heterogeneous habitats. Community Ecology 4:1-20.
24. Levin, R. 1969. Some demographic and genetic consequences of environmental heterogeneity for biological control. Bulletin of the Entomological Society of America 15:237-240.
25. Molofsky, J. 1994. Population dynamics and pattern formation in theoretical populations. Ecology 75: 30-39.
26. Molofsky, J., J. D. Bever, J. Antonovics and T. J. Newman. 2002. Negative frequency dependence and the importance of spatial scale. Ecology 83:21-27.
27. Molofsky, J., R. Durrett, J. Dushoff, D. Griffeath and S. Levin. 1999. Local frequency dependence and global coexistence. Theor. Popul. Biol. 55:270-282.
28. Murray, J. D. 1989. Mathematical Biology. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
29. Murrell, D. J. and R. Law. 2003. Heteromyopia and the spatial coexistence of similar competitors. Ecology Letters 6: 48-59.
30. Murrell, D. J, D. W. Purves, and R. Law. 2001. Uniting pattern and process in plant ecology. TREE 16: 529-530.
31. Nee, S. and R. R. May. 1992. Dynamics of metapopulations: Habitat destruction and competitive coexistence. J. Anim. Ecol. 61:37-40.
32. Neuhauser, C. 1992. Ergodic theorems for the multitype contact process. Probab. Theory Related Fields 91:467-506
33. Neuhauser, C. 1998. Habitat destruction and competitive coexistence in spatially explicit models with local interactions. J. theor. Biol. 193:445-463.
34. Neuhauser, C. 2001. Mathematical challenges in spatial ecology. Notices of the AMS 48:1304-1314.
35. Pimentel, D., S. McNair, J. Wightman, C. Simmonds, C. O'Connell, E. Wong, E. Russel, J. Zern, T. Aquino, and T. Tsomondo. 2001. Economic and environmental threats of alien plant, animal and microbial invasions. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 84: 1-20.
36. Plotkin, J. B., M. D. Potts, N. Leslie, N. Manokaran, J. LaFrankie and P. S. Ashton. 2000. Species area curves, spatial aggregation, and habitat specialization in tropical forests. J. theor. Biol. 207:81-99
37. Rácz, É V. P. and J. Karsai. 2003. Computer simulation results for cellular automata models of some ecological systems. Folia FSN Universitatis Masarykianae Brunniensis Mathematica 13:213-221.
38. Silvertown, J. 2004. Plant coexistence and the niche. TREE 19:605-611.
39. Silvertown, J., Holtier, S., Johnson J. and P. Dale. 1992. Cellular automaton models of interspecific comperition for space - the effect of pattern on process. J. Ecol. 80:527-534.
40. Silvertown, J. and J. B. Wilson. 2000. Spatial interactions among grassland plant populations. In: U. Dieckman, R. Law and J. A. J. Metz (eds.) The Geometry of Ecological Interactions. Simplifying Spatial Complexity. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, pp. 28-47.
41. Skellam, J. G. 1951. Random dispersal in theoretical populations. Biometrika 38:196-218.
42. Tilman, D. 1994. Competition and biodiversity in spatially structured habitats. Ecology 75:2-16.
43. Tilman, D. and P. Kareiva (eds) 1997. Spatial Ecology: The Role of Space in Population Dynamics and Interspecific Interactions. Princeton University Press, New Jersey.
44. Tilman, D. and C. L. Lehman. 1997. Habitat destruction and species extinctions. In: D. Tilman, and P. Kareiva (eds), Spatial Ecology: The Role of Space in Population Dynamics and Interspecifics Interactions. Princeton University Press, New Jersey, pp. 233-249
45. Turner, M. G., R. H. Gardner and R. V. O'Neill. 1999. Landscape Ecology in Theory and Practice: Pattern and Process. Springer-Verlag, New York.
46. von Neumann, J. 1966. Theory of Self-Reproducing Automata. University of Illinois Press, Urbana.
47. Wolfram, S. 1986. Theory and Applications of Cellular Automata. World Scientific, Singapore.
48. Wolfram, S. 2002. A New Kind of Science. Wolfram Media, Champaign, IL.
49. Yu, D. W., H. B. Wilson. 2001. The competition-colonization trade-off is dead; long live the competition-colonization trade-off. Am. Nat. 158:49-63.