The effects of the incision types in myringoplasty operations on cosmesis

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology

Volumn 263, Issue 9, 2006, Pages 820-822

  Coskun, Berna Uslu ^a,b   Cinar, Ugur ^a   Seven, Huseyin ^a   Ugur, Seher ^a   Dadas, Burhan ^a  

^a SISLI ETFAL TRAINING AND RESEARCH HOSPITAL   (Turkey)

^b NONE   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Auriculomastoid angle; Myringoplasty; Myringoplasty incision

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EAR SURGERY; EARDRUM PERFORATION; ESTHETIC SURGERY; ESTHETICS; FEMALE; HUMAN; INCISION; MALE; MASTOID; MYRINGOPLASTY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYRINGOPLASTY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TYMPANIC MEMBRANE; TYMPANIC MEMBRANE PERFORATION;

EID: 33746409614     PISSN: 09374477     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00405-006-0069-z     Document Type: Article

References (1)

1. Inwood JL, Wallace HC, Clarke SE (2003) Endaural or post-aural incision for myringoplasty: does it make a difference to the patient. Clin Otolaryngol 28:396-398