What can't functional neuroimaging tell the cognitive psychologist?

Cortex

Volumn 42, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 428-443

  Page, Mike P A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HERTFORDSHIRE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cognitive psychology; Functional neuroimaging

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; BRAIN FUNCTION; BRAIN REGION; COGNITION; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; NEUROANATOMY; NEUROIMAGING; NEUROPSYCHOLOGY; PREDICTION; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; PSYCHOLOGIST; REACTION TIME; READING; REVIEW; SHORT TERM MEMORY; TASK PERFORMANCE; BRAIN CORTEX; BRAIN MAPPING; MEMORY; METHODOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY;

BRAIN MAPPING; CEREBRAL CORTEX; COGNITION; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MEMORY; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; NEUROPSYCHOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY;

EID: 33746402958     PISSN: 00109452     EISSN: 00109452     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70375-7     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Botvinick MM, Cochen JD and Carter CS. Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: An update. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8: 539-546, 2004.
2. Brodmann K. Vergleichende Lokalisationslehre der Grosshirnrinde in Ihren Prinzipien Dargestellt auf Grund des Zellenbaues. Leipzig: JA Barth, 1909.
3. Brown GDA, Preece T and Hulme C. Oscillator-based memory for serial order. Psychological Review, 107: 127-181, 2000.
4. Burgess N and Hitch GJ. Memory for serial order: A network model of the phonological loop and its timing. Psychological Review, 106: 551-581, 1999.
5. Burgess PW and Shallice T. Confabulation and the control of recollection. Memory, 4: 359-411, 1996.
6. Coltheart M. Cognitive neuropsychology. In Wixted J (Ed), Stevens' Handbook of Experimental Psychology (vol. 4): Methodology. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2002.
7. Coltheart M. What has functional neuroimaging told us about the mind (so far)? Cortex, 42: 323-331, 2006.
8. Donaldson W. The role of decision processes in remembering and knowing. Memory and Cognition, 24: 523-533, 1996.
9. Duncan J. An adaptive coding model of neural function in prefrontal cortex. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2: 820-829, 2001.
10. Fodor JA. Let your brain alone. London Review of Books, 21, 1999. http://www.lrb.co.uk/article.php?get=fodo01_2119
11. Harley TA. Does cognitive neuropsychology have a future? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 21: 3-16, 2004a.
12. Harley TA. Promises, promises. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 21: 51-56, 2004b.
13. Heathcote A. Item recognition memory and the receiver operating characteristic. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29: 1210-1230, 2003.
14. Henson RNA. What can functional neuroimaging tell the experimental psychologist? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58A: 193-233, 2005.
15. Henson RNA, Cansino S, Herron JE, Robb WGK and Rugg MD. A familiarity signal in human anterior medial temporal cortex. Hippocampus, 13: 259-262, 2003.
16. Holden C. Nimh takes a new tack, upsetting behavioral researchers. Science, 306: 602, 2004.
17. Indefrey P and Levelt WJM. The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components. Cognition, 92: 101-144, 2004.
18. Joanisse MF and Seidenberg MS. Impairments in verb morphology after brain injury: A connectionist model. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 96: 7592-7597, 1999.
19. Levelt WJM, Roelofs A and Meyer AS. A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22: 1-75, 1999.
20. Logothetis NK. The neural basis of the blood-oxygen-level-dependent functional magnetic resonance imaging signal. In Parker A (Ed), The Physiology of Cognitive Processes. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003.
21. Logothetis NK, Pauls J, Augath M, Trinath T and Oeltermann A. Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal. Nature, 412: 150-157, 2001.
22. Longworth CE, Marslen-Wilson WD, Randall B and Tyler LK. Getting to the meaning of the regular past tense: Evidence from neuropsychology. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17: 1087-1097, 2005.
23. Marslen-Wilson WD and Tyler LK. Capturing underlying differentiation in the human language system: Comment. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7: 62-63, 2003.
24. McClelland JL and Patterson K. Rules or connections in past-tense inflections: What does the evidence rule out? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6: 465-472, 2002a.
25. McClelland JL and Patterson K. "Words or rules" cannot exploit the regularity in exceptions: Reply to Pinker and Ullman. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6: 464-465, 2002b.
26. McClelland JL and Patterson K. Differentiation and integration in human language: Reply. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7: 63-64, 2003.
27. Miozzo M. On the processing of regular and irregular forms of verbs and nouns: Evidence from neuropsychology. Cognition, 87: 101-127, 2003.
28. Otten LJ, Henson RNA and Rugg MD. Depth of processing effects on neural correlates of memory encoding: Relationship between findings from across- and within-task comparisons. Brain, 124: 399-412, 2001.
29. Otten LJ and Rugg MD. Task-dependency of the neural correlates of episodic encoding as measured by fMRI. Cerebral Cortex, 11: 1150-1160, 2001.
30. Paap KR. Functional neuroimages do not constrain cognitive models of language processing. Paper presented at the 22nd Annual Interdisciplinary Conference, Jackson Hole, Wyoming, February, 1997.
31. Page MPA. What can't functional neuroimaging tell the experimental psychologist? Paper presented at the Conference of the Experimental Psychology Society, London, January, 2004.
32. Pinker S and Ullman MT. The past and future of the past tense. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6: 456-463, 2002a.
33. Pinker S and Ullman MT. Combination and structure, not gradedness, is the issue: Reply to McClelland and Patterson. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6: 472-474, 2002b.
34. Pinker S and Ullman MT. Beyond one model per phenomenon. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7: 108-109, 2003.
35. Plaut DC, McClelland JL, Seidenberg MS and Patterson K. Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103: 56-115, 1996.
36. Pulvermüller F. Words in the brain's language. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22: 253-336, 1999.
37. Pylyshyn ZW. Computation and cognition: Issues in the foundations of cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3: 111-169, 1980.
38. Ramscar M. The past-tense debate: Exocentric form versus the evidence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7: 107-108, 2003.
39. Seidenberg MS and Joanisse ME. Show us the model: Comment. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7: 106-107, 2003.
40. Seron X and Fias W. How images of the brain can constrain cognitive theory: The case of numerical cognition. Cortex, 42: 406-410, 2006.
41. Shallice T. Functional imaging and neuropsychology findings: How can they be linked? Neuroimage, 20: S146-S154, 2003.
42. Smith EE and Jonides J. Working memory: A view from neuroimaging. Cognitive Psychology, 33: 5-42, 1997.
43. Stroop JR. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18: 643-662, 1935.
44. Stuss DT, Alexander MP, Palumbo CL, Buckle L and Al. E. Organizational strategies with unilateral or bilateral frontal lobe injury in word learning tasks. Neuropsychology, 8: 355-373, 1994.
45. Swick D and Knight RT. Is prefrontal cortex involved in cued recall? A neuropsychological test of PET findings. Neuropsychologia, 34: 1019-1028, 1996.
46. Tulving E. Memory and consciousness. Canadian Psychology, 26: 1-12, 1985.
47. Tulving E, Kapur S, Craik FIM, Moscovitch M and Houle S. Hemispheric encoding/retrieval asymmetry in episodic memory: Positron emission tomography findings. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 91: 2016-2020, 1994.
48. Tyler LK, Stamatakis EA, Jones RW, Bright P, Acres K and Wilson WDM. Deficits for semantics and the irregular past tense: A causal relationship? Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16: 1159-1172, 2004.
49. Uttal WR. The New Phrenology: The Limits of Localizing Cognitive Processes in the Brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2001.
50. van Orden GC and Paap KR. Functional neuroimages fait to discover pieces of mind in the parts of the brain. Philosophy of Science, 64: S85-S94, 1997.
51. Winston JS, Henson RNA, Goulden MRF and Dolan RJ. FMRI-adaptation reveals dissociable neural representations of identity and expression in face perception. Journal of Neurophysiology, 92: 1830-1839, 2004.
52. Yonelinas AP. The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research. Journal of Memory and Language, 46: 441-517, 2002.