Factors affecting the cement penetration of a hip resurfacing implant: An in vitro study

HIP International

Volumn 16, Issue SUPPL. 4, 2006, Pages

  Howald, Ralph ^a   Kesteris, U ^b   Klabunde, R ^a   Krevolin, J ^a  

^a Zimmer GmbH   (Switzerland)

^b LUND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Bone cement; Hip resurfacing; Jet lavage; Penetration; Pulse lavage; Viscosity

Indexed keywords

BONE CEMENT;

ARTICLE; BONE DENSITY; CADAVER; CONTROLLED STUDY; FROZEN SECTION; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IN VITRO STUDY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAVAGE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; SURGEON; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TIME; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT PLANNING; VISCOSITY;

EID: 33746387886     PISSN: 11207000     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5301/hip.2008.5209     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Breusch SJ, Schneider U, Kreutzer J, Ewerbeck V, Lukoschek M. Effects of the cementing technique on cementing results concerning the coxal end of the femur. Orthopade 2000; 29: 260-70.
2. Breusch SJ, Schneider U, Reitzel T, Kreutzer J, Ewerbeck V, Lukoschek M. Significance of jet lavage for in vitro and in vivo cement penetration. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 2001; 139: 52-63.
3. Breusch SJ, Norman TL, Schneider U, Reitzel T, Blaha JD, Lukoschek M. Lavage technique in total hip arthroplasty: jet lavage produces better cement penetration than syringe lavage in the proximal femur. J Arthroplasty 2000; 15: 921-7.
4. Wirtz D, Sellei RM, Portheine F, Prescher A, Weber M. Effect of femoral intramedullary irrigation on periprosthetic cement distribution: jet lavage versus syringe lavage. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 2001; 139: 410-4.
5. Morberg P, Albrektsson T, Reigstad A, et al. A qualitative and quantitative study of retrieved femoral heads in three different types of resurface hip arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 1993, 8: 617-24.
6. Morberg PH, Johansson CB, Reigstad A, Rokkum M. Vital staining of bone in stable, retrieved femoral surface replacement prostheses: a microscopic study of undecalcified ground sections. J Arthroplasty 2001; 16: 1004-9.
7. Amstutz HC, Kabo M, Dorey F, Mirra J. Modes of failure and risk factors of resurfacing hip arthroplasty. 15th Annual Meeting. Lake Buena Vista: Society for Biomaterials 1989; 214.
8. Howie DW, Cornish BL, Vernon-Roberts B. Resurfacing hip arthroplasty. Classification of loosening and the role of prosthesis wear particles. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1990; 144-159.
9. Nelson CL, Walz BH, Gruenwald JM. Resurfacing of only the femoral head for osteonecrosis. Long-term follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 1997; 12: 736-40.
10. Campbell P, Nasser S, Kossovsky N, Amstutz HC. Retrieval analysis of femoral porous coated surface replacements. 15th Annual Meeting. Lake Buena Vista: Society for Biomaterials 1989; 33.
11. Krajbich J, Fornasier VL, Schatzker J. Microscopic anatomy of a femoral head after resurfacing arthroplasty: a case report. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1981; 30-6.
12. Grigoris P, Roberts P, Panousis K, Bosch H. The evolution of hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 2005; 36: 125-34.
13. Myers ER. Elements of research: Study design and data analysis. In: Buckwalter JAM, Einhorn TAM, Simon SM, eds. Orthopaedic basic science: Biology and biomechanics of the musculoskeletal system. 2nd Ed. Hardbound Text and CD-ROM. Rosemont IL: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 2000; 7.
14. Kühn KD. Bone cements - Up-to-date comparison of physical and chemical properties of commercial materials. Berlin: Springer-Verlag 2000.
15. Dayton MR, Incavo SJ, Churchill DL, Uroskie JA, Beynnon BD. Effects of early and late stage cement intrusion into cancellous bone. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002; 39-45.
16. Juliusson R, Flivik G, Nilsson J, Ryd L, Onnerfalt R. Circulating blood diminishes cement penetration into cancellous bone. In vivo studies of 21 arthrotic femoral heads. Acta Orthop Scand 1995; 66: 234-8.
17. Campbell P, Mirra J, Amstutz HC. Viability of femoral heads treated with resurfacing arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2000; 15: 120-2.
18. Bell RS, Schatzker J, Fornasier VL, Goodman SB. A study of implant failure in the Wagner resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1985; 67: 1165-75.
19. Albrektsson T, Linder L. Bone injury caused by curing bone cement. A vital microscopic study in the rabbit tibia. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1984; 280-7.
20. Little CP, Ruiz AL, Harding IJ, Lardy-Smith P, Gundle R, Murray DW, Athanasou NA. Osteonecrosis in retrieved femoral heads after failed resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005; 87: 320-3.
21. Huiskes R, Strens P, Vroemen W, Slooff TJ. Post-loosening mechanical behavior of femoral resurfacing prostheses. Clin Mater 1990; 6: 37-55.
22. Amstutz HC, Campbell PA, Le Duff MJ. Fracture of the neck of the femur after surface arthroplasty of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86: 1874-7.
23. Schreiber A, Jacob HA. Loosening of the femoral component of the ICLH double cup hip prosthesis. A biomechanical investigation with reference to clinical results. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 1984; 207: S1-34.
24. Ploeg H, Soulhat J, Hertig D, O'Keane M, Roberts P, Grigoris P. Finite element analysis of a cemented surface replacement of the proximal femur. Transactions of the 4th Combined Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Societies of the USA, Canada, Europe and Japan. Rhodes, Greece 2001; poster 224.
25. Walker PS, Soudry M, Ewald FC, McVickar H. Control of cement penetration in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1984; 155-64.
26. Ritter MA, Herbst SA, Keating EM, Faris PM. Radiolucency at the bone-cement interface in total knee replacement. The effects of bone-surface preparation and cement technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1994; 76: 60-5.
27. Huiskes R, Slooff TJ. Thermal injury of cancellous bone, following pressurized penetration of acrylic cement. 27th annual meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society. Las Vegas: ORS 1981; 134.
28. Krause WR, Krug W, Miller J. Strength of the cement-bone interface. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1982; 290-9.
29. Kim YH, Walker PS, Deland JT. A cement impactor for uniform cement penetration in the upper tibia. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1984; 206-10.