Risk assessment of "down-the-drain" chemicals: Search for a suitable model

Science of the Total Environment

Volumn 360, Issue 1-3, 2006, Pages 305-318

  Keller, V ^a  

^a CENTRE FOR ECOLOGY AND HYDROLOGY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Chemical; Drains; EUSES; GREAT ER; Mackay models; Mike 11; Models; Pollution; QUAL2E; Sewers; TOMCAT

Indexed keywords

DATA ACQUISITION; DETERGENTS; DRAINAGE; LAWS AND LEGISLATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEWERS; WATER QUALITY;

EUSES; MACKAY MODELS; MULTIMEDIA FATE MODELS; TOMCAT;

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT;

CHEMICAL COMPOUND; DOMESTIC CHEMICAL;

ANTHROPOGENIC SOURCE; DETERGENT; DOMESTIC WASTE; ENVIRONMENTAL RISK; HEALTH RISK; MODEL; RISK ASSESSMENT;

ARTICLE; DATA ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; RIVER; SEWAGE DISPOSAL; SEWAGE EFFLUENT; SEWER; WATER ANALYSIS; WATER POLLUTANT; WATER POLLUTION; WATER QUALITY; WATER SUPPLY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ENVIRONMENT; EVALUATION; REVIEW; SEWAGE; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ENVIRONMENT; HOUSEHOLD PRODUCTS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; RIVERS; WASTE DISPOSAL, FLUID; WATER POLLUTANTS, CHEMICAL;

EID: 33746387035     PISSN: 00489697     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.08.042     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Berding V., and Matthies M. European scenarios for EUSES regional distribution model. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 9 3 (2002) 193-198
2. Boeije G. GREAT-ER - technical documentation. Chemical fate models (1999), Gent University, Germany
3. Boeije G.M., Wagner J.-O., Koormann F., Vanrolleghem P.A., Schowanek D.R., and Feijtel T.C.J. New PEC definitions for river basins applicable to GIS-based environmental exposure assessment. Chemosphere 40 3 (2000) 255-265
4. Bowden K., and Brown S.R. Relating effluent control parameters to river quality objectives using a generalized catchment simulation-model. Water Sci Technol 16 5-7 (1984) 197-206
5. Chapra S.C. Surface water-quality modeling. International editions (1997), McGraw-Hill
6. Chaudhury R.R., Sobrinho J.A.H., Wright R.M., and Sreenivas M. Dissolved oxygen modeling of the Blackstone river (Northeastern United States). Water Res 32 8 (1998) 2400-2412
7. Commission of the European Communities. White paper-strategy for a future chemicals policy. COM(2001) 88 final (2001), Commission of the European Communities, Brussels
8. Cox B.A. A review of dissolved oxygen modelling techniques for lowland rivers. Sci Total Environ 314-316 (2003) 303-334
9. Crockett C.P., Crabtree R.W., and Cluckie I.D. River quality models for consent setting in England and Wales. Water Sci Technol 21 8-9 (1989) 1015-1024
10. Cubillo F., Rodriguez B., and Barnwell T.O. A system for control of river water-quality for the community of Madrid using Qual2e. Water Sci Technol 26 7-8 (1992) 1867-1873
11. Department of the Environment. A guide to risk assessment and risk management for environmental protection (1995), HMSO, London, UK
12. DHI. Mike-11: a modelling system for rivers and channels, reference manual (2003), DHI-Water and Development, Horsholm, Denmark
13. DHI. Mike-11: a modelling system for rivers and channels, user guide (2003), DHI-Water and Development, Horsholm, Denmark
14. Drolc A., and Koncan J.Z. Calibration of QUAL2E model for the Sava River (Slovenia). Water Sci Technol 40 10 (1999) 111-118
15. Duvail S., and Hamerlynck O. Mitigation of negative ecological and socio-economic impacts of the Diama dam on the Senegal River Delta wetland (Mauritania), using a model based decision support system. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 7 1 (2003) 133-146
16. ECETOC. GREAT-ER user manual special report no. 16. ECETOC (1999), Brussels, Belgium
17. European Commission. Technical guidance document on risk assessment in support of commission directive 93/67/EEC on risk assessment for new notified substances, commission regulation (EC) No 1488/94 on risk assessment for existing substances, and Directive 98/8/EC of the European parliament and of the council concerning the placing of biocidal products on the market: Part II (2003), Office for Official Publications of the European Communities
18. Fedra K., and Jamieson D.G. The 'WaterWare' decision-support system for river-basin planning: 2. Planning capability. J Hydrol 177 3-4 (1996) 177-198
19. Feijtel T., Boeije G., Matthies M., Young A., Morris G., Gandolfi C., et al. Development of a geography-referenced regional exposure assessment tool for European rivers-GREAT-ER contribution to GREAT-ER #1. Chemosphere 34 11 (1997) 2351-2373
20. Feijtel T., Boeije G., Matthies M., Young A., Morris G., Gandolfi C., et al. Development of a geography-referenced regional exposure assessment tool for European rivers-GREAT-ER. J Hazard Mater 61 1-3 (1998) 59-65
21. Foundation for Water Research. Urban Pollution Management (UPM)-a planning guide for the management of urban wastewater discharges during wet weather (1994), Foundation for Water Research, UK
22. Fox K.K., Daniel M., Morris G., and Holt M.S. The use of measured boron concentration data from the GREAT-ER UK validation study (1996-1998) to generate predicted regional boron concentrations. Sci Total Environ 251-252 (2000) 305-316
23. Ghosh N.C., and McBean E.A. Water quality modeling of the Kali River, India. Water Air Soil Pollut 102 1-2 (1998) 91-103
24. Jager D.T., Vermeire T.G., Slooff W., and Roelfzema H. Uniform system for the evaluation of substances II effects assessment. Chemosphere 29 2 (1994) 319-335
25. Jager D.T., Visser C.J.M., and van de Meent D. Uniform system for the evaluation of substances: IV. Distribution and intake. Chemosphere 29 2 (1994) 353-369
26. Jager T., Vermeire T.G., Rikken M.G.J., and van der Poel P. Opportunities for a probabilistic risk assessment of chemicals in the European Union. Chemosphere 43 2 (2001) 257-264
27. James A. An introduction to water quality modelling. Second edition (1993), John Wiley and Sons
28. Jamieson D.G., and Fedra K. The 'WaterWare' decision-support system for river-basin planning: 1. Conceptual design. J Hydrol 177 3-4 (1996) 163-175
29. Jamieson D.G., and Fedra K. The 'WaterWare' decision-support system for river-basin planning: 3. Example applications. J Hydrol 177 3-4 (1996) 199-211
30. Jaworska J.S., Schowanek D., and Feijtel T.C.J. Environmental risk assessment for trisodium S,S-ethylene diamine disuccinate, a biodegradable chelator used in detergent applications. Chemosphere 38 15 (1999) 3597-3625
31. Junge C.E. Basic considerations about trace constituents in the atmosphere as related to the fate of global pollutants. Fate of pollutants in the air and water environments (1977), I.H. Suffet, John Wiley, New York 7-26
32. Kamal M.M., Malmgren-Hansen A., and Badruzzaman A.B.M. Assessment of pollution of the River Buriganga, Bangladesh, using a water quality model. Water Sci Technol 40 2 (1999) 129-136
33. Kawamoto K., MacLeod M., and Mackay D. Evaluation and comparison of multimedia mass balance models of chemical fate: application of EUSES and ChemCAN to 68 chemicals in Japan. Chemosphere 44 4 (2001) 599-612
34. Kazmi A.A., and Hansen I.S. Numerical models in water quality management: a case study for the Yamuna River (India). Water Sci Technol 36 5 (1997) 193-200
35. Mackay D. Multimedia environmental models. The fugacity approach (2001), Lewis Publishers, Chelsea, UK
36. Mackay D., DiGuardo A., Paterson S., Kicsi G., and Cowan C.E. Assessing the fate of new and existing chemicals: a five-stage process. Environ Toxicol Chem 15 9 (1996) 1618-1626
37. Mackay D., Paterson S., and Shiu W.Y. Generic models for evaluating the regional fate of chemicals. Chemosphere 24 6 (1992) 695-717
38. MacLeod M., and Mackay D. Modeling transport and deposition of contaminants to ecosystems of concern: a case study for the Laurentian Great Lakes. Environ Pollut 128 1-2 (2004) 241-250
39. Marsh T.J., and Lees M.L. Hydrometric register and statistics 1996-2000. Hydrological data UK series (2003), CEH Wallingford/British Geological Survey, Wallingford, UK
40. Matthies M., Berlekamp J., Koormann F., and Wagner J.O. Georeferenced regional simulation and aquatic exposure assessment. Water Sci Technol 43 7 (2001) 231-238
41. McAvoy D.C., Masscheleyn P., Peng C., Morrall S.W., Casilla A.B., Lim J.M.U., et al. Risk assessment approach for untreated wastewater using the QUAL2E water quality model. Chemosphere 52 1 (2003) 55-66
42. Ning S.K., Chang N.-B., Yang L., Chen H.W., and Hsu H.Y. Assessing pollution prevention program by QUAL2E simulation analysis for the Kao-Ping River Basin, Taiwan. J Environ Manage 61 1 (2001) 61-76
43. NRA. Water quality objectives: procedures used by the National Rivers Authority for the purpose of the Surface Waters (River Ecosystem Classification) Regulations 1994 (1994), National Rivers Authority (NRA), Bristol, UK
44. Post D.A., Kinsey-Henderson A.E., Stewart L.K., Roth C.H., and Reghenzani J. Optimising drainage from sugar cane fields using a one-dimensional flow routing model: a case study from Ripple Creek, North Queensland. Environ Model Softw 18 8-9 (2003) 713-720
45. RIVM. The European Union System for the Evaluation of Substances (EUSES) 1.00 User Manual. Report No: 1306/97 CSR TV/el (1997), National Institute of Public Health and Environmental Protection (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands
46. Sabaliunas D., Webb S.F., Hauk A., Jacob M., and Eckhoff W.S. Environmental fate of Triclosan in the River Aire Basin, UK. Water Res 37 (2003) 3145-3154
47. Schulze C., and Matthies M. Georeferenced aquatic fate simulation of cleaning agent and detergent ingredients in the River Rur catchment (Germany). Sci Total Environ 280 1-3 (2001) 55-77
48. Schwartz S., Berding V., and Matthies M. Aquatic fate assessment of the polycyclic musk fragrance HHCB-scenario and variability analysis in accordance with the EU risk assessment guidelines. Chemosphere 41 5 (2000) 671-679
49. Struijs J. SimpleTreat 3.0: a model to predict the distribution and elimination of chemicals by sewage treatment plants. Report No: 719101025 (1996), National Institute of Public Health and Environmental Protection (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands
50. Thomann R.V. Principles of surface water quality modeling and control (1987), Harper and Row
51. Thompson J.R., Sorenson H.R., Gavin H., and Refsgaard A. Application of the coupled MIKE SHE/MIKE 11 modelling system to a lowland wet grassland in southeast England. J Hydrol 293 1-4 (2004) 151-179
52. Van de Meent D. SimpleBox: a generic multimedia fate evaluation model. Report vol. 672720001 (1993), National Institute of Public Health and Environmental Protection (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands
53. van der Poel P. Uniform system for the evaluation of substances: III. Emission estimation. Chemosphere 29 2 (1994) 337-352
54. Vermeire T.G., van der Zandt P.T.J., Roelfzema H., and van Leeuwen C.J. Uniform system for the evaluation of substances: I. Principles and structure. Chemosphere 29 1 (1994) 23-38
55. Vermeire T.G., Jager D.T., Bussian B., Devillers J., den Haan K., Hansen B., et al. European Union System for the Evaluation of Substances (EUSES). Principles and structure. Chemosphere 34 8 (1997) 1823-1836
56. Warn A.E., and Brew J.S. Mass Balance. Water Res 14 (1980) 1427-1434
57. Water Resources Act. Water Resources Act 1991. Chapter 57 (1991), HMSO, London
58. Webster E., Mackay D., Di Guardo A., Kane D., and Woodfine D. Regional differences in chemical fate model outcome. Chemosphere 55 10 (2004) 1361-1376
59. Woodfine D., MacLeod M., and Mackay D. A regionally segmented national scale multimedia contaminant fate model for Canada with GIS data input and display. Environ Pollut 119 (2002) 341-355
60. Young A.R., Grew R., and Holmes M.G. Low Flows 2000: a national water resources assessment and decision support tool. Water Sci Technol 48 10 (2003) 119-126