Effects of a glass-ionomer cement on the remineralization of occlusal caries - An in situ study

Brazilian Oral Research

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 91-96

  Amaral, Mônica Tostes ^a   Guedes Pinto, Antônio Carlos ^b   Chevitarese, Orlando ^c  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^c NONE

Author keywords

Dental enamel; Glass ionomer cements; Hardness

Indexed keywords

BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE; FISSURE SEALANT; FUJI IX; GLASS IONOMER;

ARTICLE; CASE CONTROL STUDY; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL SURGERY; DRUG EFFECT; ENAMEL; HARDNESS; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HARDNESS TESTS; HUMANS; PIT AND FISSURE SEALANTS; TOOTH REMINERALIZATION;

EID: 33746377963     PISSN: 18068324     EISSN: 18073107     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S1806-83242006000200001     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Benelli EM, Serra MC, Rodrigues AL Jr, Cury JA. In situ anticariogenic potential of glass ionomer cement. Caries Res 1993;27:280-4.
2. Bravo M, Osório E, Garcia-Anllo J, Llodra JC, Baca P. The influence of dft index on sealant success: a 48-month survival analysis. J Dent Res 1996;75:768-74.
3. Cain BE, Corpron RE, Fee CL, Strachan DS, Kowalski CJ. Dose related remineralization using intraoral fluoride-releasing devices in situ. Caries Res 1994;28:284-90.
4. Deery C, Fyffe HE, Nugent ZJ, Nuttall NM, Pitts NB. General dental practitioners diagnostic and treatment decisions related to fissure sealed surfaces. J Dent 2000;28:313-8.
5. Featherstone JDB, ten Cate JM, Shariati M, Arends J. Comparison of artificial caries-like lesions by quantitative microradiography and microhardness profiles. Caries Res 1983;17(5):385-91.
6. Featherstone JD, Zero DT. An in situ model for simultaneous assessment of inhibition of demineralization and enhancement of remineralization. J Dent Res 1992;71:804-10.
7. Forss H, Jokinen J, Spets-Happonen S, Seppä L, Luoma H. Fluoride and mutans streptococci in plaque grown on glass ionomer and composite. Caries Res 1991;25:454-8.
8. Forss H, Näse L, Seppä L. Fluoride concentration, mutans streptococci and lactobacilli in plaque from old glass ionomer fillings. Caries Res 1995;29:50-3.
9. Forss H, Saarni UM, Seppä L. Comparison of glass-ionomer and resin-based fissure selants: a 2-year clinical trial. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1994;22:21-4.
10. Forss H, Seppä L. Prevention of enamel demineralization adjacent to glass ionomer filling materials. Scand J Dent Res 1989;98:173-8.
11. Hattab FN, El-Mowafy OM, Salem NS, El-Badrawy WA. An in vivo study on the release of fluoride from glass-ionomer cement. Quintessence Int 1991;22:221-4.
12. Hicks MJ, Flaitz CM. Caries formation in vitro around a fluoride-releasing pit and fissure sealant in primary teeth. J Dent Child 1998;65:161-8.
13. Karlzén-Reuterving G, van Dijken JW. A three-year follow-up of glass ionomer cement and resin fissure sealants. ASDC J Dent Child 1995;62:108-10.
14. Koulourides T, Phantumvanit E, Munksgaard EC, Housch T. An intraoral model used for studies of fluoride incorporation in enamel. J Oral Pathol 1974;3:185-96.
15. Lagerweij MD, Damen JJM, ten Cate JM. Demineralization of dentin grooves in vitro. Caries Res 1996;30:231-6.
16. Locker D, Ivkovic A, Kay EI. Prevention. Part 8: The use of pit and fissure sealants in preventing caries in the permanent dentition of children. Br Dent J 2003;195:375-8.
17. Lussi A. Validity of diagnostic and treatment decisions of fissure caries without cavitation. Caries Res 1991;27:409-15.
18. Marinelli CB, Donly KJ, Wefel JS, Jakobsen JR, Denehy GE. An in vitro comparison of three fluoride regimens on enamel remineralization. Caries Res 1997;31:418-22.
19. Mejàre I, Mjör IA. Glass ionomer and resin-based fissure sealants: a clinical study. Scand J Dent Res 1990;98:345-50.
20. Mertz-Fairhurst EJ, Curtis JW Jr, Ergle JW, Rueggeberg FA, Adair SM. Ultraconservative and cariostatic sealed restorations: results at year 10. J Am Dent Assoc 1998;129:55-65.
21. Palenik CJ, Behnen MJ, Setcos JC, Miller CH. Inhibition of microbial adherence and growth by various glass ionomers in vitro. Dent Mater 1992;8:16-20.
22. Selwistz RH, Nowjack-Raymer R, Driscoll WS, Li SH. Evaluation after 4 years of the combined use of fluoride and dental sealants. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1995;23:30-5.
23. Serra MC, Cury JA. The in vitro effect of glass-ionomer cement restoration on enamel subjected to a demineralization and remineralization model. Quintessence Int 1992;23:43-7.
24. Seppä L, Forss H. Resistance of occlusal fissures to remineralization after loss of glass ionomer sealants in vitro. J Clin Pediatr Dent 1991;13:39-42.
25. Seppä L, Forss H, Ogaard B. The effect of fluoride application on fluoride release and the antibacterial action of glass ionomers. J Dent Res 1993;72:1310-4.
26. Seppä L, Salmenkivi S, Forss H. Enamel and plaque fluoride following glass ionomer application in vivo. Caries Res 1992;26:340-4.
27. Tantbirojn D, Douglas WH, Versluis A. Inhibitive effect of a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement on remote enamel artificial caries. Caries Res 1997;31:275-80.
28. van Dijken J, Persson S, Sjöström S. Presence of Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacilli in saliva and on enamel, glass ionomer cement, and composite resin surfaces. Scand J Dent Res 1991;99:13-9.
29. van Dorp CS, ten Cate JM. Bonding of fissure sealant to etched demineralized enamel (lesions). Caries Res 1987;21:513-21.