Breast density segmentation using texture

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 4046 LNCS, Issue , 2006, Pages 609-615

  Petroudi, Styliani ^a   Brady, Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; IMAGE PROCESSING; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; MARKOV PROCESSES; RANDOM PROCESSES; STATISTICAL METHODS;

BREAST DENSITY SEGMENTATION; BREAST PARENCHYMAL SEGMENTATION; MARKOV RANDOM FIELDS;

IMAGE SEGMENTATION;

EID: 33746370740     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/11783237_82     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. J. Heine and P. Malhotra. Mammographic tissue, breast cancer risk, serial image analysis and digital mammography. part 1. tissue and related risk factors. Academic Radioly, 9:298-316, 2002.
2. P. Miller and S. Astley. Classification of breast tissue by texture and analysis. Image and Vision Computing, 10:277-282, 1992.
3. R. Zwiggelaar, P. Planiol, J. Marti, R. Marti, L. Blot, E. Denton, and C. Rubin. EM texture segmentation of mammographic images. In H. Peitgen, editor, International Workshop on Digital Mammography, pages 223-227, Bremen, Germany, 2002. Springer.
4. S. Petroudi, T. Kadir, and M. Brady. Automatic classification of mammographic parenchymal patterns: A statistical approach. In Proceedings of EMBC, International Conference on Engineering in Medicine and Biology, pages 798-801. IEEE, 2003.
5. P. Brault and A. Mohammad-Djafari. Bayesian segmentation and motion estimation in video sequences using a markov-potts model. In Proceedings of WSEAS Conference on Applied Mathematics 2004, 2004.
6. Y. Zhang, M. Brady, and S. Smith. Segmentation of brain MR images through a hidden markov random field model and the expectation maximization algorithm. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., 20(1):45-57, 2001.
7. M. Varma and A. Zisserman. Classifying images of materials: Achieving viewpoint and illumination independence. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision, Copenhagen, Denmark, pages 255-271, 2002.
8. J. K. Fwu and P. M. Djuric. Unsupervised vector image segmentation by a tree structure-icm algorithm. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., 15(6):871-880, 1996.
9. J. Besag. On the statistical analysis of dirty pictures, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B (Methodological), 48(3):259-302, 1986.
10. J. Besag. Spatial interaction and the statistical analysis of lattice systems. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 36(2):192-236, 1974.
11. M.G. Linguraru. K. Marias, and J.M. Brady. Temporal mass detection. In International Workshop on Digital Mammography, 2002.
12. S. Petroudi and M. Brady. Breast segmentation. In Seventh International Workshop on Digital Mammography. Medical Physics Publishing, 2004.
13. J.N. Wolfe. Breast parenchymal patterns and their changes with age. Radiology, 121:545-552, 1976.
14. N. Vujovic and D. Brzakovic. Establishing correspondence between control points in pairs of mammographic images. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 6(10):1388-1399, 1997.
15. C.J.G. Evertsz, A. Bodicker, S. Bohnenkamp, D. Dechow, C. Beck, H.-O. Peitgen, L. Berger, U. Weber, H. Jurgens, C.L. Hendriks, N. Karssemeijer, and M. Brady. Soft-copy reading environment for screening mammography - screen. In M. Yaffe, editor, Fifth International Workshop in Digital Mammogrphy, pages 566-572, 2000.
16. P. Miller and S. Astley. Automated detection of mammographic asymmetry using anatomical features. International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, 7(6):1461-1476, 1993.