Evaluating the effectiveness of tutorial dialogue instruction in an exploratory learning context

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 4053 LNCS, Issue , 2006, Pages 666-674

  Kumar, Rohit ^a   Rosé, Carolyn ^a   Aleven, Vincent ^a   Iglesias, Ana ^a   Robinson, Allen ^a  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; EDUCATION; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SYSTEMS;

EXPLORATORY LEARNING ENVIRONMENT; INSTRUCTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS; TUTORIAL DIALOGUE AGENTS; TUTORIAL DIALOGUE SUPPORT;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EID: 33746352365     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/11774303_66     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. Aleven, V, & Rosé, C. P. (2005), Authoring plug-in tutor agents by demonstration: Rapid rapid tutor development, Proceedings of AI in Education '05.
2. Bloom, B. S. (1984). The 2 Sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educational Researcher, 13:4-16.
3. Cohen, P. A., Kulik, J. A., and Kulik, C. C. (1982). Educational outcomes of tutoring: A meta-analysis of findings. American Educational Research Journal, 19:237-248.
4. Forbus, K. D., Whalley, P. B., Evrett, J. O., Ureel, L., Brokowski, M., Baher, J., Kuehne, S. E. (1999). CyclePad: An Articulate Virtual Laboratory for Engineering Thermodynamics. Artificial Intelligence 114(1-2): 297-347.
5. Graesser, A., VanLehn, K., the TRG, & the NLT. (2002). Why2 Report: Evaluation of Why/Atlas, Why/AutoTutor, and Accomplished Human Tutors on Learning Gains for Qualitative Physics Problems and Explanations, LRDC Tech Report, (2002) University of Pittsburgh.
6. Graesser, A. C., Jackson, G. T., Mathews, E. C., Mitchell, H. H., Olney, A., Ventura, M., Chipman, P., Franceschetti, D., Hu, X., Louwerse, M. M., Person, N. K., and the Tutoring Research Group, (2003). Why/AutoTutor: A Test of Learning Gains from a Physics Tutor with Natural Language Dialog. Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society.
7. Koedinger, K. R., Aleven, V., Heffernan, N., McLaren, B., & Hockenberry, M. (2004). Opening the Door to Non-Programmers: Authoring Intelligent Tutor Behavior by Demonstration. In J. C. Lester, R. M. Vicario, & F. Paraguaçu (Eds.), Proceedings of Seventh International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, ITS 2004 (pp. 162-174). Berlin: Springer Verlag.
8. Person, N., Bautista, L., Graesser, A., Mathews, E., & The Tutoring Research Group (2001). In J. D. Moore, C. L. Redfield, & W. L. Johnson (Eds.), Artificial Intelligence in Education: AI-ED in the Wired and Wireless Future, Proceedings of AI-ED 2001 (pp. 286-293). Amsterdam, IOS Press.
9. Rosé, C. P., Aleven, V., Carey, R., Robinson, A., Wu, C. (2005). A First Evaluation of the Instructional Value of Negotiatble Problem Solving Goals on the Exploratory Learning Continuum, Proceedings of AI in Eduction '05.
10. Rosé, C. P., Torrey, C., Aleven, V., Robinson, A., Wu, C. & Forbus, K. (2004). Cycle-Talk: Towards a Dialogue Agent that Guides Design with an Articulate Simulator, Proceedings of the Intelligent Tutoring Systems Conference.
11. Rosé, C. P., Jordan, P., Ringenberg, M., Siler, S., VanLehn, K., Weinstein, A. (2001). Interactive Conceptual Tutoring in Atlas-Andes, Proceedings of AI in Education 2001
12. VanLehn, K., Graesser, A., Tanner, J., Jordan, P., Olney, A. & Rosé, C. P. (2005). When is reading just as effective as one-on-one interactive tutoring? Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society.