Occupational performance of persons who have suffered a stroke: A follow-up study

Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 88-94

  Ahlström, Stina ^a,c   Bernspång, Birgitta ^b  

^a Rehabilitation Unit   (Sweden)

^b UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c Råneå Vårdcentral   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Assessment of Motor and Process Skills; Longitudinal study; Occupational therapy; Primary health care

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DAY CARE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HOME CARE; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HUMAN; INDEPENDENCE; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY; RATING SCALE; REFERENCE VALUE; STROKE; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 33746348622     PISSN: 11038128     EISSN: 16512014     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/11038120310009443     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Fisher AG. Uniting practice and theory in an occupational framework. Am J Occup Ther 1998; 52: 509-21.
2. Kielhofner G. A model of human occupation. Theory and application, 2nd edn. Baltimore: Williams & WiIkins, 1995.
3. World Health Organization: International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, ICF. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2001.
4. National Board of Health and Welfare. National Guidelines for the care and treatment of stroke patients (in Swedish). Stockholm: National Board of Health and Welfare, 2000.
5. Tatemichi TK, Desmond DW, Stern Y, Paik M, Sano M, Bagiella E. Cognitive impairment after stroke: Frequency, patterns, and relationship to functional abilities. J Neural Neurosurg Psychiatry 1994; 57: 202-7.
6. Jörgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, ViveLarsen J, Stöier M, Olsen TS. Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke, Part 2: Time course of recovery. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995; 76: 406-12.
7. Grimby G, Andrén E, Daving Y, Wright B. Dependence and perceived difficulty in daily activities in communityliving stroke survivors 2 years after stroke. A study of instrumental structures. Stroke 1998; 29: 1843-9.
8. Nydevik I, Hulter-Åsberg K. Sickness impact after stroke. Scand J Prim Health Care 1992; 10: 284-9.
9. Löfgren B, Nyberg L, Mattsson M, Gustafson Y. Three years after in-patient stroke rehabilitation: A follow-up study. Cerebrovasc Dis 1999; 9: 163-70.
10. Dekker R, Arendzen JH, Eisma WH. Functional status and dependency of stroke patients 5 years after clinical rehabilitation. J Rehabil Sei 1995; 8: 99-105.
11. Wilkinson PR, Wolfe CDA, Warburton FG, Rudd AG, Howard RS, Ross-Russell RW, Beech RR. A long-term follow-up of stroke patients. Stroke 1997; 28: 507-12.
12. Lindmark B, Hamrin E. A five-year follow-up of stroke survivors: Motor function and activities of daily living. Clin Rehabil 1995; 9: 1-9.
13. Fisher AG. Assessment of motor and process skills, 3rd edn. Fort Collins, CO: Three Star Press, 1999.
14. Linacre JM. Facets: Many-facet Rasch measurement computer program. Version 3.03. Chicago: MESA Press, 1994.
15. Linacre JM. Many-faceted Rasch measurement, 2nd edn. Chicago: MESA Press, 1993.
16. Dickerson AE, Fisher AG. Age differences in functional performance. Am J Occup Ther 1993; 47: 686-92.
17. Fisher AG. The assessment of IADL motor skills: An application of many-faceted Rasch analysis. Am J Occup Ther 1993; 47: 319-29.
18. Fisher AG. Development of a functional assessment that adjusts ability measures for task simplicity and rater leniency. In: Wilson M, ed. Objective measurement: Theory and practice, vol. 2. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1994: 145-75.
19. Fisher AG, Liu Y, Velozo CA, Pan AW. Cross-cultural assessment of process skills. Am J Occup Ther 1992; 46: 876-85.
20. Bernspång B, Fisher AG. Differences between persons with right or left cerebral vascular accident on the assessment of motor and process skills. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995; 76: 1144-51.
21. Doble SE, Fisk JD, Fisher AG, Ritvo PG, Murray TJ. Evaluating the functional competence of communitydwelling persons with multiple sclerosis using the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS). Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994; 75: 843-51.
22. Nygård L, Bernspång B, Fisher AG, Winblad B. Comparing motor and process ability of persons with suspected dementia in home and clinic settings. Am J Occup Ther 1994; 48: 689-96.
23. Pan AW, Fisher AG. The Assessment of Motor and Process Skills in persons with psychiatric disorders. Am J Occup Ther 1994; 48: 775-80.
24. Park S, Fisher AG, Velozo C. Using the assessment of motor and process skills to compare occupational performance between home and clinic settings. Am J Occup Ther 1994; 48: 697-709.
25. National Board of Health and Welfare. Suffering a stroke. What is the situation two years after admission? (in Swedish). Stockholm: National Board of Health and Welfare, 2001.
26. MacNeill SE, Lichtenberg PA. Home alone: The role of cognition in return to independent living. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997; 78: 755-8.
27. MacNeill SE, Lichtenberg PA. Predictors for functional outcome in older rehabilitation patients. Rehabil Psych 1998; 43: 246-57.
28. Heikkinen E, Heikkinen RL, Ruoppila I. Functional capacity and health of elderly people - the Evergreen Project. Scand J Soc Med 1997; 25(Suppl. 53): 79-100.
29. Sonn U, Grimby G, Svanborg A. Activities of daily living studied longitudinally between 70 and 76 years of age. Disabil Rehab 1996; 18: 91-100.
30. Avlund K, Davidsen M. Changes in functional ability from ages 70 to 75: a Danish longitudinal study. J Aging Health 1995; 7: 254-82.
31. Darragh AR, Sample PL, Fisher AG. Environment effect on functional task performance in adults with acquired brain injuries: Use of the assessment of motor and process skills. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998; 79: 418-23.