Mutual fund performance persistence and competition: A cross-sector analysis

Journal of Financial Research

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 349-366

  Keswani, Aneel ^a   Stolin, David ^b  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b TOULOUSE BUSINESS SCHOOL   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33746341149     PISSN: 02702592     EISSN: 14756803     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6803.2006.00182.x     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Allen, D. E. and M. L. Tan, 1999, A test of the persistence in the performance of UK managed funds, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 26, 559-93.
2. Berk, J. B. and R. C. Green, 2004, Mutual fund flows and performance in rational markets, Journal of Political Economy 112, 1269-95.
3. Blake, C. R., E. J. Elton, and M. J. Gruber, 1993, The performance of bond mutual funds, Journal of Business 66, 371-403.
4. Blake, D. and A. Timmermann, 1998, Mutual fund performance: Evidence from the UK, European Finance Review 2, 57-77.
5. Blake, D. and A. Timmermann, 2003, Performance persistence in mutual funds: An independent assessment of the studies prepared by Charles River Associates for the Investment Management Association, Report commissioned by the Financial Services Authority.
6. Brown, S. J., W. N. Goetzmann, R. G. Ibbotson, and S. A. Ross, 1992, Survivorship bias in performance studies, Review of Financial Studies 5, 553-80.
7. Carhart, M. M., 1997, On persistence in mutual fund performance, Journal of Finance 52, 57-82.
8. Carpenter, J. N. and A. W. Lynch, 1999, Survivorship bias and attrition effects in measures of performance persistence, Journal of Financial Economics 54, 337-74.
9. Cooper, M. J., H. Gulen, and P. R. Rau, 2005, Changing names with style: Mutual fund name changes and their effects on fund flows, Journal of Finance 60, 2825-58.
10. Fletcher, J. and D. Forbes, 2002, An exploration of the persistence of UK unit trust performance, Journal of Empirical Finance 9, 475-93.
11. Giles, T., T. Wilsdon, and T. Worboys, 2002, Performance persistence in UK equity funds - An empirical analysis, Report prepared by Charles River Associates for the Investment Management Association, London, United Kingdom.
12. Ibbotson, R. and A. Patel, 2002, Do winners repeat with style?, Yale ICF Working paper 00-70.
13. Kosowski, R., A. Timmermann, H. White, and R. Wermers, 2003, Can mutual fund "stars" really pick stocks? New evidence from a bootstrap analysis, Working paper, INSEAD.
14. Massa, M., 2003, How do family strategies affect fund performance? When performance-maximization is not the only game in town, Journal of Financial Economics 67, 249-304.
15. Quigley, G. and R. Sinquefield, 2000, Performance of UK equity unit trusts, Journal of Asset Management 1, 72-92.
16. Papke, L. and J. Wooldridge, 1996, Econometric methods for fractional response variables with an application to 401(k) plan participation rates, Journal of Applied Econometrics 11, 619-32.
17. Rhodes, M., 2000, Past imperfect? The performance of UK equity managed funds, Financial Services Authority Occasional Paper No. 9.
18. Siggelkow, N., 2003, Why focus? A study of intra-industry focus effects, Journal of Industrial Economics 51, 121-50.
19. Teo, M. and S.-J. Woo, 2001, Persistence in style-adjusted mutual fund returns, Working paper, Harvard University.
20. Ter Horst, J., T. Nijman, and M. Verbeek, 2001, Eliminating look-ahead bias in evaluating persistence in mutual fund performance, Journal of Empirical Finance 8, 345-73.
21. Volkman, D. A. and M. E. Wohar, 1995, Determinants of persistence in relative performance of mutual funds, Journal of Financial Research 18, 415-30.
22. Waring, G. F., 1996, Industry differences in the persistence of firm-specific returns, American Economic Review 86, 1253-65.
23. Wermers, R., 2003, Is money really smart? New evidence on the relation between mutual fund flows, manager behavior, and performance persistence, Working paper, University of Maryland.