Texture based segmentation

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 4046 LNCS, Issue , 2006, Pages 433-440

  Zwiggelaar, Reyer ^a   Denton, Erika R E ^b  

^a ABERYSTWYTH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b NORFOLK AND NORWICH UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MEDICAL IMAGING; OPTICAL RESOLVING POWER; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION; TEXTURES;

PROBABILITY DENSITY DISTRIBUTIONS; QUALITATIVE EVALUATION; TRANSPORTATION ESTIMATION; WOLFE CLASSIFICATION;

IMAGE SEGMENTATION;

EID: 33746335057     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/11783237_58     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. M.W. Haralick. Statistical and structural approaches to texture. Proceedings of the IEEE, 67(5):786-804, 1979.
2. R.W. Conners and C.A. Harlow. A theoretical comparison of texture algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2(3):204-222, 1980.
3. A.P. Pentland. Fractal-based description of natural scenes. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 6(6):661-674, 1984.
4. T.R. Reed and J.M.H. Dubuf. A review of recent texture segmentation and feature-extraction techniques. Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing, 57(3):359-372, 1993.
5. C.C. Reyes-Aldasoro and A. Bhalerao. Volumetric texture description and discrimant feature selection for MRI. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2732:282-293, 2003.
6. th IEEE International Conference on Pattern Recognition, pages 588-591, 2004.
7. M. Varma and A. Zisserman. Classifying images of materials: achieving viewpoint and illumination independence. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2352:255-271, 2002.
8. M. Chantier and L. Van Gool. Special issue on "texture analysis and synthesis". International Journal of Computer Vision, 62:5, 2005.
9. M. Pietikainen. Image analysis with local binary patterns. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3540:115-118, 2005.
10. J.N Wolfe. Risk for breast cancer development determined by mammographic parenchymal pattern. Cancer, 37(5):2486-2492, 1976.
11. I.T. Gram, E. Funkhouser, and L. Tabar. The tabar classification of mammographic parenchymal patterns. European Journal of Radiology, 24(2): 131-136, 1997.
12. F.L. Hitchcock. The distribution of a product from several sources to numerous localities. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 20:224-230, 1941.
13. th International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 59-66, 1998.
14. P. Giannopoulos and R.C. Veltkamp. A pseudo-metric for weighted point sets. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2352:715-730, 2002.
15. A.S. Holmes, C.J. Rose, and C.J. Taylor. Measuring similarity between pixel signatures. Image and Vision Computing, 20(5-6):331-340, 2002.
16. S. Haker, L. Zhu, A. Tannenbaum, and S. Angenent. Optimal mass transport for registration and warping. International Journal of Computer Vision, 60(3):225-240, 2004.
17. F. Jing, M.J. Li, H.J. Zhang, and B. Zhang. An efficient and effective region-based image retrieval framework. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 13(5):699-709, 2004.
18. F.M. Hall. Mammographic density categories. American Journal of Radiology, 178:242-242, 2002.
19. L.A. Venta and R.E. Hendrick. Mammographic density categories - reply. American Journal of Radiology, 178:242-243, 2002.
20. N. Karssemeijer. Automated classification of parenchymal patterns in mammograms. Phys. Med. Biol., 43:365-378, 1998.
21. J.W. Byng, M.J. Yaffe, G.A. Lockwood, L.E. Little, D.L. Tritchler, and N.F. Boyd. Automated analysis of mammographic densities and breast carcinoma risk. Cancer, 80(1):66-74, 1997.
22. th International Workshop on Digital Mammography, to be published, 2004.
23. S.M. Smith and J.M. Brady. Susan - a new approach to low level image processing. International Journal of Computer Vision, 23(1):45-78, 1997.
24. S. Geman and D. Geman. Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distribution, and the Bayesian restoration of images. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 6:721-741, 1984.
25. G.L. Gimel'farb. Texture modeling by multiple pairwise pixel interactions. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 18:1110-1114, 1996.