Enantioselective organocatalytic amine conjugate addition

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Volumn 128, Issue 29, 2006, Pages 9328-9329

  Chen, Young K ^a   Yoshida, Masanori ^a   MacMillan, David W C ^a  

^a California Institute of Technology   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACETIC ACID ETHYL ESTER; AMINE; AMINOALCOHOL; BENZYL TERT BUTYLDIMETHYLSILOXYCARBAMATE; CARBAMIC ACID DERIVATIVE; CHLOROFORM; CROTONALDEHYDE; DICHLOROMETHANE; FLUORIDE ION; IMIDAZOLE DERIVATIVE; IMIDAZOLIDINONE; ISOXAZOLIDINE DERIVATIVE; SOLVENT; TETRAHYDROFURAN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

AMINATION; ARTICLE; CATALYSIS; CATALYST; CHEMICAL REACTION KINETICS; CONJUGATE; ENANTIOSELECTIVITY; MICHAEL ADDITION; PKA; STEREOCHEMISTRY; WITTIG REACTION;

ALDEHYDES; AMINES; CATALYSIS; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE;

EID: 33746326181     PISSN: 00027863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ja063267s     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. For recent reviews, see: (a) Xu, L.-W.; Xia, C.-G. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 633.
2. (b) Hultzsch, K. C. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2005, 347, 367.
3. For a review, see: Liu, M.; Sibi, M. P. Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 7991.
4. Some recent examples of enantioselective conjugate amination: (a) Jin, X. L.; Sugihara, H.; Daika, K.; Takeishi, H.; Jin, Y. Z.; Furuno, H.; Inanaga, J. Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 8321.
5. (b) Myers, J. K.; Jacobsen, E. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 8959.
6. (c) Guerin, D. J.; Miller, S. J. J. Am Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 2134.
7. (d) Yamagiwa, N.; Qin, H.; Matunaga, S.; Shibasaki, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 13419 and references therein.
8. (e) Sibi, M. P.; Prabagaran, N.; Ghorpades, S. G.; Jasperse, C. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 11796.
9. (f) Sibi, M. P.; Shay, J. J.; Liu, M.; Jasperse, C. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 6615.
10. (g) Zhuang, W.; Hazell, R. G.; Jørgensen, K. A. Chem. Commun. 2001, 1240.
11. (a) Paras, N. A.; MacMillan, D. W. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 4243.
12. (b) Austin, J. F.; MacMillan, D. W. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc, 2002, 124, 1172.
13. (c) Brown, S. P.; Goodwin, N. C.; MacMillan, D. W. C. J. Am, Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 1192.
14. (d) Quellet, S. G.; Tuttle, J. B.; MacMillan, D. W. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 32.
15. This FMO description is one of several explanations for the α-effect: (a) Fleming. I. Frontier Orbitals and Organic Reactions. Wiley-Science; New York, 1977; p 77.
16. (b) Heaton, M. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1978, 100, 2004.
17. An alternative explanation involving transition-state charge stabilization by the adjacent heteroatom has also been described: (a) DePuy, C. H.; Della, E. W.; Filley, J.; Grabowski, J. J.; Bierbaum, V. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 2481.
18. (b) Buncel, E.; Um, I.-H. Chem. Commun. 1986, 595.
19. Calculated using Advanced Chemistry Development (ACD/Labs) Software V8.14 for Solaris (1994-2006 ACD/LABS).
20. The catalysts shown are not successful with α-alkyl-substituted enals.
21. The use of TBDPS-substituted systems does not generally provide an increase in selectivities in comparison to the TBS-substituted analogues.
22. Aschwanden, P.; Kvaerno, L.; Geisser, R. W.; Kleinbeck, F.; Carreira, E. M. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 5741.
23. Keck, G. E.; Wagner, T. T.; McHardy, S. F. Tetrahedron 1999, 55, 11755.