Royal college rewrites child protection history

British Medical Journal

Volumn 333, Issue 7560, 2006, Pages 194-196

  Gornall, Jonathan ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHILD ABUSE; CHILD CARE; CHILD HEALTH; CRIMINAL JUSTICE; HEALTH PRACTITIONER; HUMAN; LEGAL ASPECT; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MUNCHAUSEN SYNDROME BY PROXY; NOTE; PEDIATRICIAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; CHILD; CHILD WELFARE; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; MEDICAL SOCIETY; PEDIATRICS; REVIEW; UNITED KINGDOM;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CHILD; CHILD ABUSE; CHILD WELFARE; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; PEDIATRICS; SOCIETIES, MEDICAL;

EID: 33746315140     PISSN: 09598146     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.333.7560.194     Document Type: Note

References (5)

1. Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health. Child protection companion. London: RCPCH, 2006.
2. Meadow R. Munchausen syndrome by proxy: the hinterlands of child abuse. Lancet 1977;ii:343-5.
3. Meadow v General Medical Council [2006] EWHC 146 (Admin).
4. Southall D, Plunkett MCB, Banks MW, Falkov AF, Samuels MP. Covert video recordings of life threatening child abuse: lessons for child protection. Pediatrics 1997;100:735-60.
5. Shabde N, Craft AW. Covert video surveillance: an important investigative tool or a breach of trust? Arch Dis Child 1999;81:291-4.