The devil's in the details: Genetic and phenotypic divergence between artificial and native populations of the endangered pupfish (Cyprinodon diabolis)

Animal Conservation

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 316-321

  Wilcox, J L ^a   Martin, Andrew P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

Divergence; Propagation; Pupfish

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL ECOSYSTEM; ENDANGERED SPECIES; EXTINCTION; FISH; GENETIC DRIFT; PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY; SPECIES CONSERVATION; SPECIES DIVERSITY;

CYPRINODON DIABOLIS;

EID: 33746312753     PISSN: 13679430     EISSN: 14691795     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-1795.2006.00039.x     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Andersen, M. & Deacon, J. E. (2001). Population size of Devil's Hole pupfish (Cyprinodon diabolis) correlates with water level. Copeia 2001, 224-228.
2. Anderson, P. (1995). Ecological restoration and creation: A review. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 56, 187-211.
3. Berejikian, B. A., Mathews, S. B. & Quinn, T. P. (1996). Effects of hatchery and wild ancestry and rearing environments on the development of agonistic behavior in steelhead trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) fry. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Biol. 53, 2004-2014.
4. Bonnie, R. (1999). Endangered species mitigation banking: Promoting recovery through habitat conservation planning under the Endangered Species Act. Sci. Total Environ. 240, 11-19.
5. Burg, T. M, Wilcox, J. & Martin, A. P. (2002). Polymorphic microsatellite loci from pupfish (genus Cyprinodon). Conserv. Genet. 3, 197-204.
6. Deacon, J., Lockard, D., Casey, O., Kobetich, G., Radtke, J., Gunther, H. & Soltz, D. (1980). Devil's Hole pupfish recovery plan. Portland: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
7. Deacon, J. D. & Williams, C. D. (1991). Ash Meadows and the legacy of the Devil's Hole pupfish. In Battle against extinction: Native fish management in the American West: 69-87. Minckley, W. L. & Deacon, J. D. (Eds). Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press.
8. Dowling, T. E., Minckley, W. L., Marsh, P. C. & Goldstein, E. S. (1996). Mitochondrial DNA variability in the endangered razorback sucker (Xyrauchen texanus): Analysis of hatchery stocks and implications for captive propagation. Conserv. Biol. 10, 120-127.
9. Ford, M. J. (2002). Selection in captivity during supportive breeding may reduce fitness in the wild. Conserv. Biol. 16, 815-825.
10. Hansen, M. M., Nielsen, E. E., Ruzzante, D. E., Bouza, C. & Mensberg, K. L. D. (2000). Genetic monitoring of supportive breeding in brown trout (Salmo trutta L.), using microsatellite DNA markers. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Biol. 57, 2130-2139.
11. Kodric-Brown, A. (1995). Does past reproductive history predict competitive interactions and male mating success in pupfish. Anim. Behav. 50, 1433-1440.
12. Kodric-Brown, A. & Nicoletto, P. (1993). The relationship between physical condition and social status in pupfish Cyprinodon pecosensis. Anim. Behav. 46, 1234-1236.
13. Lajeunesse, D., Domon, G., Drapeau, P., Cogliastro, A. & Bouchard, A. (1995). Development and application of an ecosystem management approach for protected natural areas. Environ. Mgmt. 19, 481-495.
14. Losos, J. B., Schoener, T. W., Warheit, K. I. & Creer, D. (2001). Experimental studies of adaptive differentiation in Bahamian Anolis lizards. Genetica 112, 399-415.
15. Lynch, M., Conery, J. & Burger, R. (1995). Mutation accumulation and the extinction of small populations. Am. Nat. 146, 489-518.
16. Maitland, P. S. (1995). The conservation of fresh-water fish - past and present experience. Biol. Conserv. 72, 259-270.
17. Martin, A. P. (2005). Genetic analysis of Cyprinodon diabolis: hybridization with C. nevadensis in the point of Rocks Refuge. Report submitted to the Nevada Division of Wildlife and the USFWS.
18. Minckley, W. L., Marsh, P. C., Deacon, J. E., Dowling, T. E., Hedrick, P. W., Matthews, W. J. & Mueller, G. (2003). A conservation plan for native fishes of the lower Colorado River. Bioscience 53, 219-234.
19. Philippart, J. C. (1995). Is captive breeding an effective solution for the preservation of endemic species? Biol. Conserv. 72, 281-295.
20. Reznick, D. N. & Ghalambor, C. K. (2001). The population ecology of contemporary adaptations: What empirical studies reveal about the conditions that promote adaptive evolution. Genetica 112, 183-198.
21. Ricciardi, A. & Rasmussen, J. B. (1999). Extinction rates of North American freshwater fauna. Conserv. Biol. 13, 1220-1222.
22. Schneider, S., Roessli, D. & Excoffier, L. (2000). Arlequin v. 2. A software for population genetic analysis. Genetics & Biometry Laboratory, University of Geneva, Switzerland.
23. Stockwell, C. A., Mulvey, M. & Vinyard, G. L. (1996). Translocations and the preservation of allelic diversity. Conserv. Biol. 10, 1133-1141.
24. Unwin, M. J. (1997). Fry-to-adult survival of natural and hatchery-produced chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) from a common origin. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Biol. 54, 1246-1254.
25. Unwin, M. J. & Glova, G. J. (1997). Changes in life history parameters in a naturally spawning population of chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) associated with releases of hatchery-reared fish. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Biol. 54, 1235-1245.
26. Wang, J. L. & Ryman, N. (2001). Genetic effects of multiple generations of supportive breeding. Conserv. Biol. 15, 1619-1631.
27. Youngson, A. F. & Verspoor, E. (1998). Interactions between wild and introduced Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Biol. 55, 153-160.