Reproducibility of ultrasound pachymetry using the Sonogage Corneo-Gage Plus 2

Optometry

Volumn 77, Issue 8, 2006, Pages 392-396

  Rah, Marjorie J ^a   Deng, Li ^a   Jackson, John Mark ^b  

^a NEW ENGLAND COLLEGE OF OPTOMETRY   (United States)

^b SOUTHERN COLLEGE OF OPTOMETRY   (United States)

Author keywords

Corneal thickness; Reproducibility; Ultrasound pachymeter

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CORNEA; ECHOGRAPHY; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; REFERENCE VALUE; REPRODUCIBILITY; VISUAL SYSTEM EXAMINATION;

CORNEA; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES, OPHTHALMOLOGICAL; HUMANS; REFERENCE VALUES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 33746300231     PISSN: 15291839     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.optm.2006.04.099     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Guirao A. Theoretical elastic response of the cornea to refractive surgery. Risk factors for keratectasia. J Refract Surg 21 2 (2005) 176-185
2. Spadea L., Cerrone L., Necozione S., et al. Flap measurements with the Hansatome microkeratome. J Refract Surg 18 2 (2002) 149-154
3. Fogla R., Rao S.K., and Padmanabhan P. Keratectasia in 2 cases with pellucid marginal corneal degeneration after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 29 4 (2003) 788-791
4. Haque S., Fonn D., Simpson T., et al. Corneal and epithelial thickness changes after 4 weeks of overnight corneal refractive therapy lens wear, measured with optical coherence tomography. Eye Contact Lens 30 4 (2004) 189-193 discussion 205-186
5. Alharbi A., and Swarbrick H.A. The effects of overnight orthokeratology lens wear on corneal thickness. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44 6 (2003) 2518-2523
6. Swarbrick H.A., Wong G., and O'Leary D.J. Corneal response to orthokeratology. Optom Vis Sci 75 11 (1998) 791-799
7. Phillips L.J., Cakanac C.J., Eger M.W., and Lilly M.E. Central corneal thickness and measured IOP. a clinical study. Optometry 74 4 (2003) 218-225
8. Shih C.Y., Graff Zivin J.S., Trokel S.L., et al. Clinical significance of central corneal thickness in the management of glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 122 9 (2004) 1270-1275
9. Modis Jr. L., Langenbucher A., and Seitz B. Evaluation of normal corneas using the scanning-slit topography/pachymetry system. Cornea 23 7 (2004) 689-694
10. Nichols J.J., Kosunick G.M., and Bullimore M.A. Reliability of corneal thickness and endothelial cell density measures. J Refract Surg 19 3 (2003) 344-352
11. Marsich M.W., and Bullimore M.A. The repeatability of corneal thickness measures. Cornea 19 6 (2000) 792-795
12. Gonzalez-Meijome J.M., Cervino A., Yebra-Pimentel E., et al. Central and peripheral corneal thickness measurement with Orbscan II and topographical ultrasound pachymetry. J Cataract Refract Surg 29 1 (2003) 125-132
13. Snyder A.C. Validity of optical pachymetry measurements made with contact lenses in situ. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 64 2 (1987) 104-109
14. McLaren J.W., Nau C.B., Erie J.C., et al. Corneal thickness measurement by confocal microscopy, ultrasound, and scanning slit methods. Am J Ophthalmol 137 6 (2004) 1011-1020
15. Modis Jr. L., Langenbucher A., and Seitz B. Corneal thickness measurements with contact and noncontact specular microscopic and ultrasonic pachymetry. Am J Ophthalmol 132 4 (2001) 517-521
16. Bland J.M., and Altman D.G. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Statistical Methods in Medical Research 8 (1999) 135-160