Application of microfiltration and ultrafiltration processes to cork processing wastewaters and assessment of the membrane fouling

Separation and Purification Technology

Volumn 50, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 354-364

  Benítez, F Javier ^a   Acero, Juan L ^a   Leal, Ana I ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EXTREMADURA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Cork processing wastewater; Fouling mechanisms; Microfiltration and ultrafiltration membranes; Permeate flux; Retention coefficients

Indexed keywords

FOULING; HYDRAULICS; INDUSTRIAL WASTE DISPOSAL; MEMBRANES; MICROFILTRATION; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; ORGANIC COMPOUNDS; POROSITY; REMOVAL; ULTRAFILTRATION;

CORK PROCESSING WASTEWATER; FOULING MECHANISMS; MICROFILTRATION AND ULTRAFILTRATION MEMBRANES; PERMEATE FLUX; RETENTION COEFFICIENTS;

WASTEWATER;

EID: 33746295400     PISSN: 13835866     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2005.12.010     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Minhalma M., and De Pinho M.N. Tanninc-membrane interactions on ultrafiltration of cork processing wastewaters. Sep. Purif. Technol. 22 (2001) 479-488
2. Acero J.L., Benitez F.J., Beltrán de Heredia J., and Leal A.I. Chemical treatment of cork-processing wastewaters for potential reuse. J. Chem. Tech. Biotech. 79 (2004) 1065-1072
3. Benitez F.J., Acero J.L., Garcia J., and Leal A.I. Purification of cork processing wastewaters by ozone, by activated sludge, and by their two sequential applications. Water Res. 37 (2003) 4081-4090
4. Baker R.W. Membrane Separation Systems-Recent Development, Future Direction (1991), Noyes Data Corporation, New York
5. Ball P. Scale-up and scale down of membrane based separation processes. Membr. Technol. 117 (1999) 10-13
6. Magara Y., Kunikane S., and Itoh M. Advanced membrane technology for application to water treatment. Water Sci. Technol. 113 (1999) 7-17
7. Marcucci M., Nosenzo G., Capannelli G., Ciabatti I., Corrieri D., and Ciardelli G. Treatment and reuse of textile effluents based on new ultrafiltration and other membranes technologies. Desalination 138 (2001) 75-82
8. Scholz W., and Lucas M. Techno-economic evaluation of membrane filtration for the recovery and re-use of tanning chemicals. Water Res. 37 (2003) 1859-1867
9. Wiesner M.R., and Aptel P. Mass transport and permeate flux and fouling in pressure-driven processes. In: Mallevialle J., Odendaal P.E., and Wiesner M.R. (Eds). Water Treatment Membrane Processes (1996), McGraw-Hill, New York (Chapter 4)
10. Park Y.G. Effect of ozonation for reducing membrane-fouling in the UF membrane. Desalination 147 (2002) 43-48
11. Chang I.-S., and Kim S.-N. Wastewater treatment using membrane filtration-effect of biosolids concentration on cake resistance. Process Biochem. 40 (2005) 1307-1314
12. Minhalma M., Dias C.R., and De Pinho M.N. Membrane fouling in ultrafiltration of cork processing wastewaters. Adv. Environ. Res. 3 (2000) 539-549
13. Minhalma M., and De Pinho M.N. Flocculation/flotation/ultrafiltration integrated process for the treatment of cork processing wastewaters. Environ. Sci. Technol. 35 (2001) 4916-4921
14. Maartens A., Jacobs E.P., and Swart P. UF of pulp and paper effluent: membrane fouling-prevention and cleaning. J. Membr. Sci. 209 (2002) 81-92
15. Garrido A., Garcia P., and Brenes M. The recycling of table olive brine using ultrafiltration and activated carbon adsorption. J. Food Eng. 17 (1992) 291-305
16. Ersu C.B., Braida W., Chao K.P., and Ong S.K. Ultrafiltration of ink and latex wastewaters using cellulose membranes. Desalination 164 (2000) 63-70
17. Turano E., Curcio S., De Paola M.G., Calabro V., and Dorio G. An integrated centrifugation-ultrafiltration system in the treatment of olive mill wastewater. J. Membr. Sci. 209 (2002) 519-531
18. 2 techniques. Desalination 169 (2004) 81-88
19. Acero J.L., Benitez F.J., Leal A.I., and Real F.J. Removal of phenolic compounds in water by ultrafiltration membrane treatments. J. Environ. Sci. Health A-40 (2005) 1585-1603
20. Defrance L., and Jaffrin M.Y. Comparison between filtration at fixed transmembrane pressure and fixed permeate flux: application to a membrane bioreactor used for wastewater treatment. J. Membr. Sci. 152 (1999) 203-210
21. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 16th ed., American Public Health Association (APHA), American Water Works Association (AWWA), Water Pollution Control Federation (WPCF), Washington, DC, 1985.
22. Aptel P., and Buckley C.A. Categories of membrane operations. In: Mallevialle J., Odendaal P.E., and Wiesner M.R. (Eds). Water Treatment Membrane Processes (1996), McGraw-Hill, New York (Chapter 2)
23. Koltuniewicz A.B., and Field W. Process factor during removal of oil-in-water emulsion with cross-flow microfiltration. Desalination 105 (1996) 79-86
24. 2 with a cellulose acetate reverse osmosis membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 188 (2001) 173-179
25. Abdessemed D., Nezzal G., and Ben Aim R. Treatment of wastewater by ultrafiltration. Desalination 126 (1999) 1-5
26. Mohammadi T., and Esmaeelifar A. Wastewater treatment using ultrafiltration at a vegetable oil factory. Desalination 166 (2004) 329-337
27. Mameri N., Halet F., Drouiche M., Grib H., Lounici H., Pauss A., Piron D., and Belhocine D. Treatment of olive mill washing water by ultrafiltration. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 78 (2000) 590-595
28. Vladisavljevic G.T., Vukosavljevic P., and Bukvic B. Permeate flux and fouling resistance in ultrafiltration of depectinized apple juice using ceramic membranes. J. Food Eng. 60 (2003) 241-247
29. Mulder M. Basic Principles of Membrane Technology. second ed. (1996), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordecht, The Netherlands
30. Brites A.M., and De Pinho M.N. Ultrafiltration for colour removal of tannery dyeing wastewaters. Desalination 130 (2000) 147-154
31. Pillay V.L., and Buckley C.A. Cake formation in cross-flow microfiltration systems. Water Sci. Technol. 25 (1992) 149-162