Normal values of distance heterophoria and fusional vergence ranges and effects of age

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology

Volumn 244, Issue 7, 2006, Pages 821-824

  Palomo Álvarez, Catalina ^a   Puell, María C ^a   Sánchez–Ramos, Celia ^a   Villena, Consuelo ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

Age; Distance fusional vergence; Distance heterophoria; Reference values

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; BINOCULAR CONVERGENCE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; EYE FIXATION; EYE MALFORMATION; FEMALE; GROUPS BY AGE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; NORMAL VALUE; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PATIENT IDENTIFICATION; POPULATION RESEARCH; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PRISM; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

EID: 33746288479     PISSN: 0721832X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00417-005-0166-5     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Daum KM (1991) Heterophoria and heterotropia. In: Skridge JB, Amos JF, Bartlett JD (eds) Clinical procedures in optometry. Lippincot, Philadelphia, pp 72-90
2. Daum KM (1991) Vergence amplitude. In: Skridge JB, Amos JF, Bartlett JD (eds) Clinical procedures in optometry. Lippincot, Philadelphia, pp 91-98
3. Daum KM, Rutstein RP, Houston G, Clore KA, Corliss DA (1989) Evaluation of a new criterion of binocularity. Optom Vis Sci 66:218-228
4. Ford MW, Stone J (1997) Practical optics and computer design of contact lenses. In: Phillips AJ, Speedwell L (eds) Contact lenses, 4th edn. Butterworth-Heinemann, London, pp 154-231
5. Freier BE, Pickwell LD (1983) Physiological exophoria. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 3:267-272
6. Godts D, Tassignon M-J, Gobin L (2004) Binocular vision impairment after refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 30:101-109
7. Grosvenor T (1989) Primary care optometry, 2nd edn. Professional Press Books, New York, pp 91-116
8. Grosvenor T (2002) Primary care optometry, 4th edn. Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston, pp 275-306
9. Jimenez R, Perez MA, Garcia JA, Gonzalez D (2004) Statistical normal values of visual parameters that characterize binocular function in children. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 24:528-542
10. Miller JE (1975) Aging changes in extraocular muscle. In: Lennerstrand G, Bach-y-Rita P (eds) Basic mechanisms of ocular motility and clinical implications. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 47-62
11. Morgan MW (1944) Analysis of clinical data. Am J Optom Arch Acad Optom 21:477-491
12. O'Shea WF, Ciuffreda KJ, Fisher SK, Tannen B, Super P (1988) Relation between distance heterophoria and tonic vergence. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 65:787-793
13. Rabbetts RB (1998). Bennett & Rabbetts' clinical visual optics, 3rd edn Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, pp 154-231
14. Rosenfield M, Ciuffreda KJ, Ong E, Super S (1995) Vergence adaptation and the order of clinical vergence range testing. Optom Vis Sci 72:219-223
15. Saladin JJ (1998) Phorometry and stereopsis. In: Benjamin WJ (ed) Borish's clinical refraction. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 724-773
16. Saladin JJ, Sheedy JE (1978) Population study of fixation disparity, heterophoria, and vergence. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 55:744-750
17. Scheiman M, Wick B (1994) Clinical management of binocular vision. Heterophoric, accommodative, and eye movements disorders. Lippincot, Philadelphia, pp 247-249
18. Scheiman M, Wick B (1994) Clinical management of binocular vision. Heterophoric, accommodative, and eye movements disorders. Lippincot, Philadelphia, pp 284-288
19. Spierer A, Hefetz L (1997) Normal heterophoric changes: 20 years' follow-up. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 235:345-348