Effective diffusivities and pore-transport characteristics of washcoated ceramic monolith for automotive catalytic converter

Chemical Engineering Science

Volumn 61, Issue 18, 2006, Pages 5934-5943

  Starý, Tomáš ^a   Šolcová, Olga ^b   Schneider, Petr ^b   Marek, Miloš ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY   (Czech Republic)

^b INSTITUTE OF CHEMICAL PROCESS FUNDAMENTALS   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Catalyst monolith; Diffusion; Mass transfer; Parameter identification; Single pellet string column (SPSC); Transport processes

Indexed keywords

CATALYSIS; DIFFUSION; GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY; MASS TRANSFER; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; PORE SIZE; TRANSPORT PROPERTIES;

CATALYST MONOLITH; PORE-SIZE DISTRIBUTION; SINGLE-PELLET STRING COLUMN (SPSC); TRANSPORT PROCESSES;

CERAMIC MATERIALS;

CATALYSIS; CERAMIC MATERIALS; DIFFUSION; GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY; MASS TRANSFER; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; PORE SIZE; TRANSPORT PROPERTIES;

EID: 33746273786     PISSN: 00092509     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2006.05.014     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Beeckman J.W. Measurement of the effective diffusion coefficient of nitrogen monoxide through porous monolith-type ceramic catalysts. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research 30 (1991) 428-430
2. Cybulski A., and Moujin J.A. The present and the future of structured catalysts. In: Cybulski A., and Moujin J.A. (Eds). Structured Catalysts and Reactors (1998), Marcel Dekker, New York 1-14
3. Fahim M.A., and Wakao N. Parameter estimation from tracer response measurements. Journal of Chemical Engineering Japan 25 (1982) 1-8
4. Guasguo Y., et al. The measurement of effective diffusivity for sulfur tolerant methanation catalyst. Chemical Engineering Journal 18 (2000) 141-146
5. Gulati S.T. Ceramic catalyst supports for gasoline fuel. In: Cybulski A., and Moujin J.A. (Eds). Structured Catalysts and Reactors (1998), Marcel Dekker, New York 15-58
6. Haynes H.W. The experimental evaluation of catalyst effective diffusivity. Catalysis Review-Science and Engineering 30 (1988) 363-627
7. Heck R.M., and Farrauto R.J. Catalytic Air Pollution Control: Commercial Technology (1995), Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York pp. 11-26
8. Himmelblau D.M., and Bischoff K.B. Process Analysis and Simulation. Deterministic Systems (1968), Wiley, New York
9. Honig G., and Hirdes U. A method for the numerical inversion of Laplace transforms. Journal of Computers and Applied Mathematics 10 (1984) 113-132
10. Kašpar J., et al. Automotive catalytic converters: current status and some perspectives. Catalysis Today 77 (2003) 419-449
11. Koèí P., et al. Modeling of three-way-catalyst monolith converters with microkinetics and diffusion in the washcoat. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research 43 (2004) 4503-4510
12. Kolaczkowski S.T. Evaluating the effective diffusivity of methane in the washcoat of a honeycomb monolith. Applied Catalysis 25 (2000) 93-104
13. Kolaczkowski S.T. Measurement of effective diffusivity in catalyst coated monoliths. Catalysis Today 83 (2003) 85-95
14. Kubín M. Beitrag zur Theorie der Chromatographie. Collection of Czechoslovak Chemical Communications 30 (1965) 1104-1118
15. Kučera E. Contribution of the theory of chromatography: linear non-equilibrium elution chromatography. Journal of Chromatography 19 (1965) 23-248
16. Leung D., et al. Diffusion limitation effects in the washcoat of a catalytic monolith reactor. Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering 74 (1996) 94-103
17. Mukadi L.S., and Hayes R.E. Modeling the three-way catalytic converter with mechanistic kinetics using Newton-Krylov method on a parallel computer. Computers and Chemical Engineering 26 (2002) 439-455
18. Press W.H., Flannery B.P., Teukolsky S.A., and Vetterling W.T. Numerical Recipes (1986), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
19. Ramathan K., et al. Light-off criterion and transient analysis of catalytic monoliths. Chemical Engineering Science 58 (2003) 1381-1405
20. Schneider P. Time-domain expression for impulse response (chromatographic) curve for the Kubín-Kučera model of adsorption column. Chemical Engineering Science 39 (1984) 927-929
21. Schneider P., and Smith J.M. Chromatographic study of surface diffusion. A.I.Ch.E. Journal 14 (1968) 886-895
22. Schneider P., and Smith J.M. Adsorption rate constants from chromatography. A.I.Ch.E. Journal 14 (1968) 762-771
23. Scott D.S., et al. The measurement of transport coefficients in gas-solid heterogeneous reactions. Chemical Engineering Science 29 (1974) 2155-2167
24. Seidel-Morgenstern A. Analysis of boundary conditions in the axial dispersion model by application of numerical Laplace inversion. Chemical Engineering Science 46 10 (1991) 2567-2571
25. Šolcová O., and Schneider P. Extra-column effects in determination of rate parameters by the chromatographic method. Collection of Czechoslovak Chemical Communications 61 (1996) 844-855
26. Šolcová O., and Schneider P. Axial dispersion in single pellet-string columns with non-porous packing. Chemical Engineering Science 59 (2004) 1301-1307
27. Šolcová O., et al. Determination of effective diffusivities and transport parameters of porous solids in the single-pellet-string-column. Catalysis Today 38 (1997) 71-77
28. Šolcová, O., et al., 2006. Diffusion coefficients and other transport characteristics of specially shaped porous materials from chromatographic measurements.Microporous and Mesoporous Material, 91(1-3) 100-106
29. Twigg M.V., and Wilkins A.J.J. Autocatalysts-past, present and future. In: Cybulski A., and Moujin J.A. (Eds). Structured Catalysts and Reactors (1998), Marcel Dekker, New York 91-120
30. Wakao N., et al. Parameter estimation in adsorption chromatography by real-time analysis. Journal of Chemical Engineering Japan 12 (1979) 481-483
31. West D.H., et al. Experimental and theoretical investigation of the mass transfer controlled regime in catalytic monoliths. Catalysis Today 88 (2003) 3-16
32. Zhang F., et al. A new technique to measure the effective diffusivity in catalytic monolith washcoat. Chemical Engineering Research and Design 82 A4 (2004) 481-489