The classification of Peirce's interpretants

Semiotica

Volumn 114, Issue 1-2, 1997, Pages 31-40

  Lalor, Brendan J ^a  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33746271158     PISSN: 00371998     EISSN: 16133692     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/semi.1997.114.1-2.31     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Hardwick, Charles S. (ed.) (1977). Semiotic and Significs: The Correspondence between Charles S. Peirce and Victoria Lady Welby. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
2. Liszka, J. J. (1990). Peirce's interpretant. Transactions of the Charles Sanders Peirce Society 26, 17–62.
3. Meyers, Robert (1992). Peirce's new way of signs. Transactions of the Charles Sanders Peirce Society 28, 505–521.
4. Pape, Helmut (1991). Not every object of a sign has being. Transactions of the Charles Sanders Peirce Society 27, 141–177.
5. Peirce, Charles S. (1931–1958). Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Charles Hartshorne, Paul Weiss, and A. W. Burks (eds.), vols. 1–8. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. [Reference to Peirce's papers will be designated CP.]
6. Peirce, Charles S. Unpublished manuscripts, numbered and paginated by the Institute for Studies in Pragmatism, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX. [Reference to Peirce's unpublished manuscripts will be designated MS.]
7. Short, T. L. (1981). Semeiosis and intentionality. Transactions of the Charles Sanders Peirce Society 17, 197–223.
8. Short, T. L. (1982). Life among the legisigns. Transactions of the Charles Sanders Peirce Society 18, 285–310.