Cortisol, behavioral responses, and injury scores of sows housed in gestation stalls

Journal of Swine Health and Production

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 196-201

  Anil, Leena ^a   Anil, Sukumarannair S ^a   Deen, John ^a   Baidoo, Samuel K ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Behavior; Cortisol; Gestation; Swine; Welfare

Indexed keywords

EID: 33746263755     PISSN: 1537209X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.54846/jshap/462     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Barnett JL, Hemsworth PH, Cronin GM, Newman, EA, McCallum TH. Effects of design of individual cage-stalls on the behavioural and physiological responses related to the welfare of pregnant pigs. App Anim Behav Sci. 1991;32:23-33.
2. Webster AJF. The challenge of animal welfare. Proc World Conf Anim Prod. Edmonton, Canada. 1993;513-524.
3. Gonyou HW. Design criteria: Should freedom of movement be retained? Acta Agric Scand Sect A. 1996;27(Suppl):36-39.
4. Clough CE. An evaluation of the farrowing crate. Farm Build Prog. 1984;76:21-26.
5. Lawrence AB, Petherick JC, McLean KA, Chirnside J, Vaughan A, Clutton E, Terlouw EMC. The effect of environment on behaviour, plasma cortisol and prolactin in parturient sows. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 1994;39:313-330.
6. Boyle LA, Leonard FC, Lynch PB, Brophy P. Prevalence and severity of skin lesions in sows housed individually during the production cycle. Irish Vet J. 1999;52:601-605.
7. Anil L, Anil SS, Deen J. Evaluation of the relationship between injuries and size of gestation stalls relative to size of sows. JAVMA. 2002;221:834-836.
8. Petherick JC, Baxter SH. Section II: Seminar on Modeling, Design and Evaluation of Agricultural Buildings. Modeling the static spatial requirements of livestock. In: MacCormack JAD, ed. Proc CIGR. Bucksburn Aberdeen, UK: Scottish Farm Buildings Investigation Unit. 1983;75-82.
9. Hurnik JF, Lewis NJ. Use of body surface area to set minimum space allowances for confined pigs and cattle. Can J Anim Sci. 1991;71:577-580.
10. Barnett JL, Winfield CG, Cronin GM, Hernsworth PH, Dewar AM. The effect of individual and group housing on behavioral and physiological responses related to the welfare of pregnant pigs. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 1985;14:149-161.
11. Petherick JC. A biological basis for the design of space in livestock housing. Farm animal housing and welfare. In: Baxter SH, Baxter MR, MacCormack JAD, eds. Farm Animal Welfare and Housing. Boston: Martinus Njhoff Publishers; 1983:103-120.
12. Taylor L, Friend T, Smith LA. Effects of housing on in situ postures of gestating gilts. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 1988;19:265-272.
13. McFarlane JM, Boe KE, Curtis SE. Turning and walking by gilts in modified gestation crates. J Anim Sci. 1988;66:326-333.
14. Whittemore CT. Causes and consequences of change in the mature size of the domestic pig. Outlook Agric. 1994;23:55-59.
15. Mason GJ. Forms of stereotypic behaviour. In: Lawrence AB, Rushen JR, eds. Stereotypic Animal Behaviour: Fundamentals and Applications to Welfare. Oxford, United Kingdom: CAB International; 1993:7-40.
16. Cronin GM, Van Tartwijk JMFM, Van der Hel W, Verstegen MWA. The influence of degree of adaptation to tether-housing by sows in relation to behaviour and energy metabolism. Anim Prod. 1986;42:257-268.
17. Anil SS, Anil L, Deen, J. Challenges of pain assessment in animals. JAVMA. 2002;220:313-320.
18. Toscano MF, Lay DC Jr, Wilson ME. Physiological indicators of stress. In: Reynnells R, ed. The Science and Ethics Behind Animal Well-being Assessment. Washington DC: United States Department of Agriculture; 2003:10-12.
19. Hicks TA, McGlone JJ, Whisnant CS, Kattesh HG, Norman L. Behavioral, endocrine, immune, and performance measures for pigs exposed to acute stress. J Anim Sci. 1998;76:474-483.
20. Ruis MAW, TeBrake JHA, Engel B, Ekkel ED, Buist WG, Blokhuis HJ, Koolhaas JM. The circadian rhythm of salivary cortisol in growing pigs: effects of age, gender and stress. Physiol Behav. 1997;62:623-630.
21. Anil L, Bhend KMG, Baidoo SK, Morrison RS, Deen J. Comparison of injuries in sows housed in gestation stalls and group pens with electronic sow feeders. JAVMA. 2003;223:1334-1338.
22. Rojkittikhun T, Rojanasthien S, Einarsson S, Madej A, Lundeheim N. Effect of fractioned weaning on hormonal patterns and weaning to oestrus interval in primiparous sows. Acta Vet Scand. 1991;32:35-45.
23. Tsuma VT, Einarsson S, Madej A. Cortisol and β-endorphin levels in peripheral circulation around weaning in primiparous sows. Anim Reprod Sci. 1995;37:175-182.
24. Broom DM, Mendl MT, Zanella AJ. A comparison of the welfare of sows in different housing conditions. Anim Sci. 1995;61:369-385.
25. Einarsson S, Madej A, Tsuma V. The influence of stress on early pregnancy in the pig. Anim Reprod Sci. 1996;42:165-172.
26. Jarvis S, van der Vegt BJ, Lawrence AB, McLean KA, Calvert SK, Deans LA, Chirnside J. The effect of parity on the behavioural and physiological responses of parturient pigs to the farrowing environment. In: Veissier I, Boissy A, eds. Proc Int Cong Appl Ethology. France: Clermont-Ferrand; 1998:129.
27. Fowden AL, Silver M. Adrenocortical activity in the fetal pig. J Physiol. 1988;403:124P.
28. Nikolic AJ, Wivkovic B. Possible relationships of some parameters of reproductive success in sows to serum concentrations of thyroid hormones, insulin, IGF-I, cortisol and progesterone. Acta Vet Beograd. 1996;46:255-269.
29. Sekiguchi T, Koketsu Y. Behavior and reproductive performance by stalled breeding females on a commercial swine farm. J Anim Sci. 2004;82:1482-1487.
30. Baxter MR. The 'Freedom' farrowing system. Farm Build Progr. 1991;104:9-15.
31. Wood-Gush DGM, Vestergaard K. Inquisitive exploration in pigs. Anim Behav. 1993;45:185-187.
32. Morris JR, Hurnik JF, Friendship RM, Buhr MM, Allen OB. The behaviour of gestating swine housed in the Hurnik-Morris system. J Anim Sci. 1993;71:3280-3284.
33. Harris MJ, Sorrells AD, Eicher SD, Richert BT, Pajor EA. Effects on production, health and behavior of two types of housing for gestating gilts. J Anim Sci. 2002;80(Suppl 1):26-27.
34. de Koning R. Injuries in confined sows. Incidence and relation with behaviour. Ann Rech Vet. 1984;15:205-214.
35. Ekkel ED, Spoolder HAM, Hulsegge I, Hopster H. Lying characteristics as determinants for space requirements in pigs. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2003;80:19-30.
36. Petherick JC. A note on allometric relationships in large white x Landrace pigs. Anim Prod. 1983;36:497-500.