Building an ontology of cardio-vascular diseases for concept-based information retrieval

Computers in Cardiology

Volumn 32, Issue , 2005, Pages 255-258

  Gedzelman, S ^a   Simonet, M ^a   Bernhard, D ^a   Diallo, G ^a   Palmer, P ^a  

^a UNIV GRENOBLE ALPES   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEM; DATA REDUCTION; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; SEMANTICS; WEBSITES;

CARDIO VASCULAR DISEASES; ONTOLOGY; SEMANTIC WEB;

DISEASES;

EID: 33746259871     PISSN: 02766574     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/CIC.2005.1588085     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Bensilamane D, Arara A, Yetongnon K, Gargouri F, Ben-Abdallah H. Two approaches for ontologies building: from-scratch and from existing data sources. International Conference on Information Systems and Engineering, ISE 2003, July 20-25, 2003, Montreal, Canada.
2. Bodenreider O, Burgun A. Aligning Knowledge Sources in the UMLS: Methods, Quantitative Results, and Applications. Medinfo. 2004 Sept.; 2004:327-331.
3. Bodenreider O, Mitchell JA, McCray AT. Biomedical Ontologies. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing: World Scientific. 2003;:562-564.
4. Bourrigault D, Aussenac-Gilles N. Construction d'ontologies à partir de textes. Actes de la 10ème conférence annuelle sur le Traitement Automatique des Langues (TALN 2003), Batz-sur-Mer, 2003, T2 ;. 27-50.
5. CISMeF: Catalog and Index of French-language Health Internet resources. http://www.chu-rouen.fr/cismef/cismefeng.html A quality-controlled subject gateway, Rouen, Avril 2002.
6. Gedzelman S. MOB: Mesh Ontology Builder, access and use, soon available on TIMC website. http://www-timc.imag.fr/osiris
7. Medical Subject Heading Browser. http://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/MBrowser. html
8. Medline. http://medline.cos.com/
9. Patriarche R, Gedzelman S, Diallo G, Bernhard D, Bassolet CG, Ferriol S, Girard A, Mouries M, Palmer P, Simonet A, Simonet M. A Tool for Conceptual and Textual Annotation of Documents, e-challenges conference, Ljubljana, 19-21 Oct. 2005.
10. Protégé (2000). http://protege.stanford.edu/index. html
11. Salton G, Buckley C. Term-weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval. Information Processing and Management, Vol. 24, Issue 5, 1998; 513-523.
12. SKOS : Schema for Knowledge Organisation Systems. http://www.w3.org/ TR/2005/WD-swbp-skos-core-guide-20050510/
13. Smith MK, Welty C, McGuiness D. Owl web ontology guide. http://www.w3c.org/TR/owl-guide.
14. Soualmia LN, Golbreich C, Darmoni SJ. Representing the MeSH in OWL: Towards a semi-automatic Migration. First International Workshop on Formal Biomedical Knowledge Representation, collocated with KR 2004; 1-12. Whistler, Canada.
15. The Unified Medical Language System. http://umlsks.nlm.nih.gov
16. Van Assem M, Menken M, Schreiber G, Wielemaker J, Wielinga B. A Method for Converting Thesauri to RDF/OWL. ISWC'04, Hiroshima, LNCS, volume 3298; 17-31, 2004.
17. Zeng QT, Tse T, Crowell J, Divita G, Roth L, Browne AC. Identifying Consumer-Friendly Display (CFD) Names for Health Concepts. Proc AMIA Symp 2005: In press. http://www.consumerhealthvocab.org/
18. Zweigenbaum P. L'UMLS entre langue et ontologie: une approche pragmatique dans le domaine médical. Revue d'Intelligence Artificielle, 18:111-137, 2004.
19. Zweigenbaum P, Grabar N. Corpus-based associations provide additional morphological variants to medical terminologies. In Mark Musen, editor, Actes AMIA Annual Fall Symposium 2003, Washington, DC, novembre 2003. AMIA.
20. Zweigenbaum P. Encoder l'information médicale: des terminologies aux systèmes de représentation des connaissances. Innovation Stratégique en Information de Santé, (2-3):27-47, 1999.