Application of Bayesian confirmation measures for mining rules from support-confidence pareto-optimal set

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 4029 LNAI, Issue , 2006, Pages 1018-1026

  Slowinski, Roman ^a,b   Brzezinska, Izabela ^a   Greco, Salvatore ^c  

^a POZNAN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Poland)

^b SYSTEMS RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Poland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CATANIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTER SCIENCE; DECISION THEORY; SET THEORY;

BAYESIAN CONFIRMATION; MONOTONE LINK; SUPPORT-CONFIDENCE PARETO-OPTIMAL SET;

DATA MINING;

EID: 33746257606     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/11785231_107     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Agrawal, R., Imielinski, T. and Swami, A.: Mining associations between sets of items in massive databases. [In]: Proc. of the 1998 ACM-SIGMOD Int'l Conf. on Management of Data, 207-216 (1993).
2. Bayardo, R.J., Agrawal, R.: Mining the most interesting rules. [In]: Proc. of the Fifth ACM-SIGKDD Int'l Conf. on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 145-154 (1999).
3. Brin, S., Motwani, R., Ullman, J. and Tsur, S.: Dynamic itemset counting and implication rules for market basket data. [In]: Proc. of the 1997 ACM-SIGMOD Int'l Conf. on the Management of Data, 255-264 (1997).
4. Brzezinska, I., Slowinski, R.: Monotonicity of a Bayesian confirmation measure in rule support and confidence. [In]: T. Burczynski, W. Cholewa, W. Moczulski (Eds.) Recent Developments in Artificial Intelligence Methods, AI-METH Series, Gliwice, 39-42 (2005).
5. Brzezinska, I., Greco, S., Slowinski, R.: Investigation of monotone link between confirmation measures and rule support and confidence. Research Report RA-025/05, Institute of Computing Science, Poznan University of Technology, Poznan, (2005).
6. Christensen, D.: Measuring confirmation. Journal of Philosophy XCVI, 437-461 (1999).
7. Clark, P. and Boswell, P.: Rule induction with CN2: Some recent improvements. [In]: Machine Learning: Proc. of the Fifth European Conference, 151-163 (1991).
8. Eells, E., Fitelson, B.: Symmetries and asymmetries in evidential support. Philosophical Studies, 107 (2): 129-142 (2002).
9. Fitelson, B.: Studies in Bayesian Confirmation Theory. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Wisconsin, Madison (2001).
10. Fukuda, T., Morimoto, Y., Morishita, S. and Tokuyama, T.: Data Mining using two-dimensional optimized association rules: scheme, algorithms, and visualization. [In]: Proc. of the 1996 ACM-SIGMOD Int'l Conf. on the Management of Data, 13-23 (1996).
11. Good, I.J.: The best explicatum for weight of evidence. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 19: 294-299 (1984).
12. Greco, S., Pawlak, Z. and Slowinski, R.: Can Bayesian confirmation measures be useful for rough set decision rules? Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 17: 345-361 (2004).
13. International Business Machines: IBM Intelligent Miner User's Guide, Version 1, Release 1 (1996).
14. Morimoto, Y., Fukuda, T., Matsuzawa, H., Tokuyama, T. and Yoda, K.: Algorithms for mining association rules for binary segmentation of huge categorical databases. [In]: Proc. of the 24th Very Large Data Bases Conf., 380-391 (1998).
15. Morishita, S.: On classification and regression. [In]: Proc. of the First Int'l Conf. on Discovery Science - Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, 1532: 40-57 (1998).
16. Piatetsky-Shapiro, G.: Discovery, Analysis, and Presentation of Strong Rules. Chapter 12 [in]: Knowledge Discovery in Databases, AAAI/MIT Press (1991).