Comparing identification procedures when the perpetrator has changed appearance

Psychology, Crime and Law

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 429-438

  Pozzulo, Joanna D ^a   Marciniak, Siobhan ^a  

^a CARLETON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Eyewitness identifications; Lineups; Memory

Indexed keywords

EID: 33746257501     PISSN: 1068316X     EISSN: 14772744     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10683160500050690     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Cutler, B. L., & Penrod, S. D. (1988). Improving the reliability of eyewitness identification: Lineup construction and presentation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 281-290.
2. Laughery, K. R., Alexander, J. F., & Lane, A. B. (1971). Recognition of human faces: Effects of target-exposure time, target position, and type of photograph. Journal of Applied Psychology, 55, 477-483.
3. Levi, A. M., & Lindsay, R. C. L. (2001). Lineup and photospread procedures: Issues concerning policy recommendations. Psychology Public Policy and Law, 7, 776-790.
4. Lindsay, R. C. L., & Bellinger, K. (1999). Alternatives to the sequential lineup: The importance of controlling the pictures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 315-321.
5. Lindsay, R. C. L., Lea, J. A., &Fulford, J. A. (1991). Sequential lineup presentation: Technique matters. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 741-745.
6. Lindsay, R. C. L., Lea, J. A., Nosworthy, G. J., Fulford, J. A., Hector, J., LeVan, V., & Seabrook, C. (1991). Biased lineups: Sequential presentation reduces the problem. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 796-802.
7. Lindsay, R. C. L., Pozzulo, J. D., Craig, W., Lee, K., & Corber, S. (1997). Simultaneous lineups, sequential lineups, and showups: Eyewitness identification decisions of adults and children. Law Human Behavior, 21, 301-404.
8. Lindsay, R. C. L., & Wells, G. L. (1985). Improving eyewitness identifications from lineups: Simultaneous versus sequential lineup presentations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 556-564.
9. Patterson, K. E. (1978). Person recognition: More than a pretty face. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, & R, N. Sykes (Eds.), Practical Aspects of Memory (pp. 227-235). London, UK: Academic Press.
10. Patterson, K. E., & Baddeley, A. D. (1977). When face recognition fails. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 3, 406-417.
11. Pozzulo, J. D., & Lindsay, R. C. L. (1999). Elimination lineups: An improved identification procedure for child eyewitnesses. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 167-176.
12. Pozzulo, J. D., & Warren, K. L. (2003). Descriptions and identifications of strangers by youth and adult eyewitnesses. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 315-323.
13. Shapiro, P. N., & Penrod, S. (1986). Meta-analysis of facial identification studies. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 139-156.
14. Shepherd, J. W., Davies, G. M., & Ellis, H. D. (1978). How best shall a face be described? In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, & R. N. Sykes (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory (pp. 278-285). London: Academic Press.
15. Steblay, N., Dysart, J., Fulero, S., & Lindsay, R. C. L. (2001). Eyewitness accuracy rates in sequential and simultaneous lineup presentations: A meta-analytic comparison. Law and Human Behavior, 25, 459-473.
16. Wells, G. L. (1978). Applied eyewitness testimony research: System variables and estimator variables. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 1546-1557.
17. Wells, G. L. (1993). What do we know about eyewitness identification? American Psychologist, 48, 553-571.
18. Wells, G. L. (2001). Police lineups: Data, theory, and policy. Psychology, Public Policyand Law, 7, 791-801.
19. Wells, G. L., & Hryciw, B. (1984). Memory for faces: Encoding and retrieval operations. Memory and Cognition, 12, 338-344.
20. Wells, G. L., & Turtle, J.W. (1986). Eyewitness identification: The importance of lineup models. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 320-329.