Problems in comprehension of informed consent in rural and peri-urban Mali, West Africa

Clinical Trials

Volumn 3, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 306-313

  Krosin, Michael T ^a,c   Klitzman, Robert ^b   Levin, Bruce ^b   Cheng, Jianfeng ^b   Ranney, Megan L ^b  

^a ST MARY S MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b College of Physicians and Surgeons ^*  (United States)

^c NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MALARIA VACCINE;

AFRICA; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; LEARNING DISORDER; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALARIA; MALE; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICAL INSTRUMENTATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RURAL AREA; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; URBAN AREA;

CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CLINICAL TRIALS; COMPREHENSION; CULTURAL CHARACTERISTICS; DEVELOPING COUNTRIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; MALARIA; MALARIA VACCINES; MALE; MALI; QUESTIONNAIRES; RURAL POPULATION; SUBURBAN POPULATION; TRANSLATIONS;

EID: 33746253178     PISSN: 17407745     EISSN: 17407753     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1191/1740774506cn150oa     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Benatar SR, Singer PA. A new look at international research ethics. Br Med J 2000; 321: 824-26.
2. Lavori PW, Sugarman J, Hays MT, Feussner JR. Improving informed consent in clinical trials: a duty to experiment. Control Clin Trials 1999; 20: 187-93.
3. Williams CJ, Zwitter M. Informed consent in European multicentre randomised clinical trials - are patients really informed. Eur J Cancer 1994; 30A: 907-10.
4. White CS, Mason AC, Feehan M, Templeton PA. Informed consent for percutaneous lung biopsy: comparison of two consent protocols based on patient recall after the procedure. AJR 1995; 165: 1139-42.
5. Lynoe N, Sandlund M, Dahlqvist G, Jacobsson L. Informed consent: A study of quality of information given to participants in a clinical trial. Br Med J 1991; 303: 610-13.
6. Joffe S, Cook EF, Cleary PD, Clark JW, Weeks JC. Quality of informed consent in cancer clinical trials: a cross-sectional survey. Lancet 2001; 358: 1772-77.
7. Molyneux CS, Peshu N, Marsh K. Understanding of informed consent in a low income setting: three case studies from the Kenyan coast. Social Science and Medicine 2004; 59: 2547-59.
8. Marcus R, Peritz E, Gabriel KR. On closed testing procedures with special reference to ordered analysis of variance. Biometrika 1976; 63: 655-60.
9. Hochberg Y, Tamhane AC. Multiple comparison procedures. Wiley, 1987.
10. Daniel WW. Biostatistics: a foundation for analysis in the health science, 7th edition. John Wiley & Sons, 1998.
11. Bergler JH, Pennington AC, Metcalfe M, Freis ED. Informed consent: how much does the patient understand? Clin Pharmacol Ther 1980; 27: 435-40.
12. Lynoe N, Hyder Z, Chowdhury M, Ekstrom L. Obtaining informed consent in Bangladesh. NEJM 2001; 344: 460-61.
13. Appelbaum PS, Roth LH, Lidz C. The therapeutic misconception: informed consent in psychiatric research. Int J Law Psychiatry 1982; 5: 319-29.
14. Appelbaum PS, Roth LH, Lidz CW, Benson P, Winslade W. False hopes and best data: Consent to research and the therapeutic misconception. Hastings Cent Rep 1987; 17: 20-24.
15. Moodly K. HIV vaccine trial participation in South Africa - an ethical assessment. J Med Philos 2002; 27: 197-215.
16. Emmanuel EJ, Wendler D, Grady C. What makes clinical research ethical? JAMA 2000; 283: 2701-11.
17. Mayberry MK, Mayberry JF. Consent with understanding: A movement toward informed decisions. Clin Med 2002; 2: 523-26.
18. Verheggen FW, Van Wijmen FC. Myth and reality of informed consent in clinical trials. Med Law 1997; 16: 53-69.