Exploring and exploiting the limited utility of captions in recognizing intention in information graphics

ACL-05 - 43rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Proceedings of the Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 223-230

  Elzer, Stephanie ^a   Carberry, Sandra ^b   Chester, Daniel ^b   Demir, Seniz ^b   Green, Nancy ^c   Zukerman, Ingrid ^d   Trnka, Keith ^b  

^a MILLERSVILLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO   (United States)

^d MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS;

EVALUATION STUDY; GRAPHIC INTERPRETATION; INFORMATION GRAPHICS; SIGHT IMPAIRED;

COMPUTER GRAPHICS;

EID: 33746246275     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3115/1219840.1219868     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. J. Ang, R. Dhillon, A. Krupski, E. Shriberg, and A. Stolcke. 2002. Prosody-based automatic detection of annoyance and frustration in human-computer dialog. In Proc. of the Int'l Conf. on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP).
2. D. Chester and S. Elzer. 2005. Getting computers to see information graphics so users do not have to. To appear in Proc. of the 15th Int'l Symposium on Methodologies for Intelligent Systems.
3. H. Clark. 1996. Using Language. Cambridge University Press.
4. M. Corio and G. Lapalme. 1999. Generation of texts for information graphics. In Proc. of the 7th European Workshop on Natural Language Generation, 49-58.
5. S. Elzer, S. Carberry, N. Green, and J. Hoffman. 2004. Incorporating perceptual task effort into the recognition of intention in information graphics. In Proceedings of the 3rd Int'l Conference on Diagrams, LNAI 2980, 255-270. (Pubitemid 38426731)
6. S. Elzer, S. Carberry, I. Zukerman, D. Chester, N. Green, S. Demir. 2005. A probabilistic framework for recognizing intention in information graphics. To appear in Proceedings of the Int'l Joint Conf. on AI (IJCAI).
7. R. Futrelle and N. Nikolakis. 1995. Efficient analysis of complex diagrams using constraint-based parsing. In Proc. of the Third International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition.
8. R. Futrelle. 1999. Summarization of diagrams in documents. In I. Mani and M. Maybury, editors, Advances in Automated Text Summarization. MIT Press.
9. Nancy Green, Giuseppe Carenini, Stephan Kerpedjiev, Joe Mattis, Johanna Moore, and Steven Roth. Autobrief: an experimental system for the automatic generation of briefings in integrated text and information graphics. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 61(1):32-70, 2004.
10. H. P. Grice. 1969. Utterer's Meaning and Intentions. Philosophical Review, 68:147-177.
11. M. Huber, E. Durfee, and M. Wellman. 1994. The automated mapping of plans for plan recognition. In Proc. of Uncertainty in AI, 344-351.
12. S. Kerpedjiev and S. Roth. 2000. Mapping communicative goals into conceptual tasks to generate graphics in discourse. In Proc. of Int. Conf. on Intelligent User Interfaces, 60-67.
13. J. Yu, J. Hunter, E. Reiter, and S. Sripada. 2002. Recognising visual patterns to communicate gas turbine time-series data. In ES2002, 105-118.