Absolute assessment of aortic valve stenosis by planimetry using cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: Comparison with transœsophageal echocardiography, transthoracic echocardiography, and cardiac catheterisation

European Journal of Radiology

Volumn 59, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 276-283

  Reant, Patricia ^a,b   Lederlin, Mathieu ^a,b   Lafitte, Stephane ^a,b   Serri, Karim ^a,b   Montaudon, Michel ^a,b,c   Corneloup, Olivier ^a,b   Roudaut, Raymond ^a,b   Laurent, Francois ^a,b,c  

^a HAUT LÉVÊQUE HOSPITAL   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE BORDEAUX   (France)

^c INSERM   (France)

Author keywords

Aortic stenosis; Echocardiography; Magnetic resonance imaging; Planimetry

Indexed keywords

AORTIC STENOSIS; CARDIAC CATHETERISATION; PLANIMETRY; TRANSTHORACIC ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY (TTE);

BLOOD VESSELS; CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY; CATHETERS; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MEDICAL PROBLEMS;

CARDIOLOGY;

AGED; AORTA VALVE; AORTA VALVE STENOSIS; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; INTRARATER RELIABILITY; MALE; NON INVASIVE PROCEDURE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OBSERVER VARIATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TRANSESOPHAGEAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; TRANSTHORACIC ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, TRANSESOPHAGEAL; FEMALE; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 33746242239     PISSN: 0720048X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2006.02.011     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Skaerpe T., Hegrenaes L., and Hatle L. Noninvasive estimation of valve area in patients with aortic stenosis by Doppler ultrasound and two-dimensional echocardiography. Circulation 72 (1985) 810-818
2. Gorlin R., and Gorlin S. Hydraulic formula for calculation of the area of the stenotic mitral valve, other clinical measurement. Lancet 41 (1951) 1-18
3. Otto C.M., Pearlman A.S., Comess K.A., Reamer R.P., Janko C.L., and Huntsman L.L. Determination of stenotic valve area in adults using Doppler echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 7 (1986) 509-517
4. Zoghbi W.A., Farmer K.L., Soto J.G., Nelson J.G., and Quinones M.A. Accurate noninvasive quantification of stenotic aortic valve area by Doppler echocardiography. Circulation 73 (1986) 452-459
5. Danielsen R., Geibel A., Gornandt L., Kasper W., and Bubenheimer P. Reproducibility of Doppler echocardiographic quantification of aortic and mitral valve stenoses: comparison between two echocardiography centres. Am J Cardiol 67 (1991) 1013-1021
6. Omran H., Schmidt H., Hackenbroch M., et al. Silent and apparent cerebral embolism after retrograde catheterisation of the aortic valve in valvular stenosis: a prospective, randomised study. Lancet 361 (2003) 1241-1246
7. Segal J., Lerner D.J., Miller D.C., Mitchell R.S., Alderman E.A., and Popp R.L. When should Doppler-determined valve area be better than the Gorlin formula? Variation in hydraulic constants in flow states. J Am Coll Cardiol 9 (1987) 1294-1305
8. Cannon S.R., Richards K.L., and Crawford M. Hydraulic estimation of stenotic orifice area: a correction of the Gorlin formula. Circulation 71 (1985) 1170
9. Bellenger N.G., Burgess M.I., Ray S.G., et al. Comparison of left ventricular fraction and volumes in heart failure by echocardiography, radionucleide ventriculography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance; are they interchangeable?. Eur Heart J 21 (2000) 1387-1396
10. Strohm O., Schulz-Menger J., Pilz B., Osterziel K.J., Dietz R., and Friedrich M. Measurement of left ventricular dimensions and function in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. J Magn Res Imaging 13 (2001) 367-371
11. Sievers B., Brandts B., Franken U., and Trappe H.J. Single and biplane True FISP cardiovascular magnetic resonance for rapid evaluation of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 6 (2004) 593-600
12. Kupfahl C., Honold M., Meinhardt G., et al. Evaluation of aortic stenosis by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with established routine clinical techniques. Heart 90 (2004) 893-901
13. Lin S.J., Brown P.A., Watkins M.P., et al. Quantification of stenotic mitral valve area with magnetic resonance imaging and comparison with Doppler ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 44 (2004) 133-137
14. Kilner P.J., Manzara C.C., Mohiaddin R.H., et al. Magnetic resonance jet velocity mapping in mitral and aortic valve stenosis. Circulation 87 (1993) 1239-1248
15. Sondergaard L., Hildebrandt P., Lindvig K., et al. Valve area and cardiac output in aortic stenosis: quantification by magnetic resonance velocity mapping. Am Heart J 127 (1993) 1156-1164
16. DeRoos A., Reichek N., Axael L., and Kressel H.Y. Cine MR imaging in aortic stenosis. J Comput Assist Tomogr 13 (1989) 421-425
17. Caruthers S.D., Lin S.J., Brown P., et al. Practical value of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for clinical quantification of aortic valve stenosis: comparison with echocardiography. Circulation 108 (2003) 2236-2243
18. Friedrich M.G., Schulz-Menger J., Poetsch T., Pilz B., Uhlich F., and Dietz R. Quantification of valvular aortic stenosis by magnetic resonance imaging. Am Heart J 144 (2002) 224-329
19. John A.S., Dill T., Brandt R.R., et al. Magnetic resonance to assess the aortic valve area in aortic stenosis: how does it compare to current diagnostic standards?. J Am Coll Cardiol 42 (2003) 519-526
20. Ahmed S., and Shellock F.G. Magnetic resonance imaging safety: implications for cardiovascular patients. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Imaging 3 (2002) 171-182
21. Bland J.M., and Altman D.G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1 (1986) 307-310
22. Higgins C.B. Which standard has the gold?. J Am Coll Cardiol 19 (1992) 1608-1609
23. Eichenberger A.C., Jenni R., and von Schulthess G.K. Aortic valve pressure gradients in patients with velocity-encoded cine MR imaging. AJR 160 (1993) 971-977