|
|
|
Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 24-31
|
|
Comparison between two orthodontic skeletal anchorage devices: osseointegrated implants and miniscrews - Medical-Legal Considerations.
a
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
ARTICLE;
BONE SCREW;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
DENTURE;
EQUIPMENT;
HEALTH INSURANCE;
HUMAN;
INFORMED CONSENT;
INSTRUMENTATION;
INSURANCE;
LEGAL ASPECT;
LEGAL LIABILITY;
METHODOLOGY;
ORTHODONTIC DEVICE;
ORTHODONTICS;
PATIENT SATISFACTION;
PERIODONTAL DISEASE;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
TOOTH IMPLANTATION;
BONE SCREWS;
DENTAL ABUTMENTS;
DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS;
DENTAL IMPLANTS;
EQUIPMENT FAILURE;
HUMANS;
INFORMED CONSENT;
INSURANCE COVERAGE;
INSURANCE, DENTAL;
LIABILITY, LEGAL;
ORTHODONTIC ANCHORAGE PROCEDURES;
ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCE DESIGN;
ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCES;
ORTHODONTICS, CORRECTIVE;
PATIENT SATISFACTION;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
TOOTH MOVEMENT;
|
|
EID: 33746233631
PISSN: 17237785
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
|
Times cited : (6)
|
|
References (0)
|
