To opt in or opt out of electronic patient records? Isle of Wight and Scottish projects are not opt out schemes [1]

British Medical Journal

Volumn 333, Issue 7559, 2006, Pages 146-

  Cundy, Paul R ^a   Hassey, Alan ^a  

^a ROYAL COLLEGE OF GENERAL PRACTITIONERS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONFIDENTIALITY; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; EMERGENCY CARE; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INFORMED CONSENT; LETTER; MEDICAL PROFESSION; PATIENT CODING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; UNITED KINGDOM; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; MEDICAL RECORD; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; NOTE;

CHOICE BEHAVIOR; ENGLAND; HUMANS; MEDICAL RECORDS SYSTEMS, COMPUTERIZED; SCOTLAND; STATE MEDICINE;

EID: 33746233335     PISSN: 09598146     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Letter

References (1)

1. Watson N, Halamka JD. Patients should have to opt out of national electronic care records [with commentary by J Wilkinson]. BMJ 2006;333:39-43. (1 July.)