Simple real-time computerized tasks for detection of malingering among murderers with schizophrenia

Israel Journal of Psychiatry and Related Sciences

Volumn 43, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 112-118

  Kertzman, Semion ^a,c   Grinspan, Haim ^a   Birger, Moshe ^a,b   Shliapnikov, Nina ^a   Alish, Yakov ^a   Nahum, Zeev Ben ^c   Mester, Roberto ^b   Kotler, Moshe ^a,b  

^a BEER YAAKOV MENTAL HEALTH CENTER   (Israel)

^b TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^c Anima Scan Ltd   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33746216265     PISSN: 03337308     EISSN: 26172402     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric, 1994.
2. Shapiro DL. Criminal responsibility evaluations: A manual for practice. Sarasota, Flo: Professional Resource, 1999.
3. Frederick RI, Denney RL. Minding your "p's" and "q's" when using forced-choice recognition tests. Clin Neuropsychol 1998;28:193-205.
4. Rogers R. Current status of clinical methods. In: Rogers R, editor. Clinical assessment of malingering and deception. New York, NY: Guilford, 1997: pp. 373-397.
5. Lally SJ. What tests are acceptable for use in forensic evaluation? A survey of experts. Prof Psychology Res Pract 2003;34:491-498.
6. Larrabee GJ. Forensic neuropsychological assessment. In: Vanderploeg RD, editor. Clinician's guide to neuropsychological assessment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2000: pp. 301-335.
7. Sweet JJ, editor. Forensic neuropsychology: Fundamentals and practice. Exton, Penn.: Swets & Zeitlinger, 1999.
8. Tanner BA, Bowles RL, Tanner EL. Detection of intentional sub-optimal performance on a computerized finger-tapping task. J Clin Psychol 2003;59:123-131.
9. Bender SD, Rogers R. Detection of neurocognitive feigning: Development of a multi-strategy assessment. Arch Clin Neuropsychology 2004;19:49-60.
10. Pankratz L, Binder L, Wilcox L. Assessment of an exaggerated somatosensory deficit with Symptom Validity Assessment. Arch Neurol 1987;44:798.
11. Hiscock M, Hiscock CK. Refining the forced-choice method for the detection of malingering. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1989;11:967-974.
12. Iverson GL, Binder LM. Detecting exaggeration and malingering in neuropsychological assessment. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2000;15:829-858.
13. Faust D, Ackley M. Did you think it was going to be easy? Some methodological suggestions for the investigation and development of malingering detection techniques. In: Reynolds C, editor. Detection of malingering during head injury litigation. New York: Plenum, 1998: pp. 1-54.
14. Haines ME, Norris MP. Comparing students and patient simulated malingerers' performance on standard neuropsychological measures to detect feigned cognitive deficits. Clin Neuropsychol 2001;15:171-182.
15. Gervais RO, Rohling ML, Green P, Ford W. A comparison of WMT, CARB, and TOMM failure rates in non-head injury disability claimants. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 2004;19:475-487.
16. Kertzman S, Sirota A, Ben Nahum Z. Neurocognitive scanning battery - "CogScan Version 1." Manual for Users. AnimaScan LTD. Ashdod, Israel, 2000.
17. Schachtel E. On color and affect: Contribution to an understanding of Rorschach's test: II. Psychiatry 1943; 6:341-346.
18. Rose FE, Hall S, Szalda-Petree AD. Portland Digit Recognition Test-computerized: Measuring response latency improves the detection of malingering. Clin Neuropsychol 1995;9:124-134.
19. Rose FE, Hall S, Szalda-Petree AD, Bach PJ. A comparison of four tests of malingering and the effects of coaching. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 1998;13:349-363.
20. Bolan B, Foster JK, Schmand B, Bolan S. A comparison of three tests to detect feigned amnesia: The effects of feedback and the measurement of response latency. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 2002;24:154-167.
21. Hick W. On the rate of gain of information. Q J Exp Psychol 1952;4:11-26.
22. Spreen O, Strauss E. A compendium of neuropsychological tests: Administration, norms, and commentary. New York: Oxford University, 1991.
23. Franzen MD, Iverson GL. Detecting negative response bias and diagnosing of malingering: the dissimulation exam. In: Snyder PJ, Nussbaum PD, editors. Clinical Neuropsychology Practice Guidebook. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 1998: pp. 88-101.
24. Prigatano GP, Amin K. Digit Memory Test: Unequivocal cerebral dysfunction and suspected malingering. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1993;15:537-546.
25. Guilmette TJ, Hart KJ, Guiliano AJ. Malingering detection: The use of a forced-choice method in identifying organic versus simulated memory impairment. Clin Neuropsychol 1993;7:59-69.
26. Binder LM. Assessment of malingering after mild head trauma with the Portland Digit Recognition Test. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1993;15:170-182.
27. Chouinard MJ, Rouleau I. The 48-pictures test: A two-alternative forced-choice recognition test for the detection of malingering. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 1997;3:545-552.
28. Rees LM, Tombaugh TN, Gansler DA, Moczynski NP. Five validation experiments of the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM). Psychol Assess 1998;10:10-20.
29. Meyers J, Volbrecht M. Validation of Reliable Digits for detection of malingering. Assessment 1998;5:303-307.
30. Binder L, Willis S. Assessment of motivation after financially compensable minor head trauma. Psychol Assessment 1991;3:175-181.
31. Green P, Iverson GL. Validation of the computerized assessment of response bias in litigating patients with head injuries. Clin Neuropsychol 2001;15:492-497.