Is external code quality correlated with programming experience or feelgood factor?

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 4044 LNCS, Issue , 2006, Pages 65-74

  Madeyski, Lech ^a  

^a WROCLAW UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Poland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER PROGRAMMING; COMPUTER SCIENCE; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT; STUDENTS;

CODE QUALITY; PROGRAMMING EXPERIENCE;

CODES (SYMBOLS);

EID: 33746207976     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/11774129_7     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Williams, L., Kessler, R.: Pair Programming Illuminated. Addison-Wesley (2002)
2. Beck, K.: Extreme Programming Explained: Embrace Change. 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley (2004)
3. Nosek, J.T.: The case for collaborative programming. Communications of the ACM 41(3) (1998) 105-108
4. Williams, L., Kessler, R.R., Cunningham, W., Jeffries, R.: Strengthening the case for pair programming. IEEE Software 17(4) (2000) 19-25
5. Williams, L.: The Collaborative Software Process. PhD thesis, University of Utah (2000)
6. Nawrocki, J.R., Wojciechowski, A.: Experimental evaluation of pair programming. In: ESCOM '01: European Software Control and Metrics. (2001) 269-276
7. Nawrocki, J.R., Jasiński, M., Olek, L., Lange, B.: Pair Programming vs. Side-by-Side Programming. In Richardson, I., Abrahamsson, P., Messnarz, R., eds.: EuroSPI. Volume 3792 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science., Springer (2005) 28-38
8. Williams, L., Maximilien, E.M., Vouk, M.: Test-Driven Development as a Defect-Reduction Practice. In: ISSRE '03: Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering, Washington, DC, USA, IEEE Computer Society (2003) 34-48
9. Maximilien, E.M., Williams, L.A.: Assessing Test-Driven Development at IBM. In: ICSE '03: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Software Engineering, IEEE Computer Society (2003) 564-569
10. George, B., Williams, L.A.: An Initial Investigation of Test Driven Development in Industry. In: SAC '03: Proceedings of the 2003 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, ACM (2003) 1135-1139
11. George, B., Williams, L.A.: A structured experiment of test-driven development. Information and Software Technology 46(5) (2004) 337-342
12. Madeyski, L.: Preliminary Analysis of the Effects of Pair Programming and Test-Driven Development on the External Code Quality. In Zieliński, K., Szmuc, T., eds.: Software Engineering: Evolution and Emerging Technologies. Volume 130 of Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications. IOS Press (2005) 113-123
13. Müller. M.M., Hagner, O.: Experiment about test-first programming. IEE Proceedings - Software 149(5) (2002) 131-136
14. Müller, M.M.: Are Reviews an Alternative to Pair Programming? In: EASE '03: Conference on Empirical Assessment In Software Engineering. (2003)
15. Müller, M.M.: Are Reviews an Alternative to Pair Programming? Empirical Soft-ware Engineering 9(4) (2004) 335-351
16. Hulkko, H., Abrahamsson, P.: A Multiple Case Study on the Impact of Pair Programming on Product Quality. In: ICSE '05: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Software Engineering, New York, NY, USA, ACM Press (2005) 495-504
17. Müller, M.M., Padberg, F.: An empirical study about the feelgood factor in pair programming. In: METRICS '04: Proceedings of the Software Metrics, 10th International Symposium on (METRICS'04), Washington, DC, USA, IEEE Computer Society (2004) 151-158
18. Wohlin, C., Runeson, P., Höst, M., Ohlsson, M.C., Regnell, B., Wesslén, A.: Experimentation in Software Engineering: An Introduction. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA, USA (2000)
19. Williams, L.A., Kessler, R.R.: All I really need to know about pair programming I learned in kindergarten. Commun. ACM 43(5) (2000) 108-114
20. Erdogmus, H., Morisio, M., Torchiano, M.: On the Effectiveness of the Test-First Approach to Programming. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 31(3) (2005) 226-237
21. Shadish, W.R., Cook, T.D., Campbell, D.T.: Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Houghton Mifflin (2002)
22. Kitchenham, B., Pfleeger, S.L., Pickard, L., Jones, P., Hoaglin, D.C., Emam, K.E., Rosenberg, J.: Preliminary Guidelines for Empirical Research in Software Engineering. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 28(8) (2002) 721-734
23. Porter, A., Votta, L.: Comparing detection methods for software requirements inspections: A replication using professional subjects. Empirical Softw. Engg. 3(4) (1998) 355-379
24. Host, M., Wohlin, C., Thelin, T.: Experimental context classification: incentives and experience of subjects. In: ICSE '05: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Software Engineering, New York, NY. USA, ACM Press (2005) 470-478