The Phoenix rising: Emergent models of instructional design

Distance Education

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 171-185

  Irlbeck, Sonja ^a   Kays, Elena ^a   Jones, Deborah ^b   Sims, Rod ^a  

^a CAPELLA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33746206476     PISSN: 01587919     EISSN: 14750198     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01587910600789514     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Alexander, C. (1964). Notes on the synthesis of form. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
2. Anderson, T., & Elloumi, F. (Eds.). (2004). Theory and practice of online learning. Athabasca, BC, Canada: Athabasca University.
3. Churchman, C. W. (1967). Wicked problems. Management Science, 4(14), 141-142.
4. Cross, N. (1999). Design research: A disciplined conversation. Design Issues, 15(2), 5-10.
5. Gagné, R. M. (1974). Essentials of learning for instruction. New York: Dryden Press.
6. Johnson, S. (2001). Emergence: The connected lives of ants, brains, and software. New York: Simon & Schuster.
7. Kays, E. (2003a). Architecture and instructional design: A model for e-learning. E-Learn 2003: World Conference in E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, & Higher Education, Phoenix, AZ (pp. 257-264).
8. Kays, E. (2003b). Creating emergent discourse: A critical ingredient in e-learning. Proceedings of E-Learn 2003: World Conference in E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, & Higher Education, Phoenix, AZ (pp. 252-256).
9. Kays, E. (2003c). The four pillars of rapport: A critical ingredient in e-learning. Proceedings of the Interior Design Educators Council International Conference, San Diego, CA (pp. 46-48).
10. Kays, E. (2003d). Architecture and instructional design: A conceptual model for e-learning. Doctoral dissertation, Capella University, UMI No. 3119170.
11. Kays, E., & Francis, J. B. (2004). Emergence and e-learning: From artificial to natural selection. Proceedings of E-Learn 2003: World Conference in E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, & Higher Education, Washington, DC, p. 1286-1289.
12. Merrill, D., & Wilson, B. (in press). "The future of instructional design and technology." Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (2nd ed.), Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice-Hall. Retrieved July 5, 2006, from: http://carbon.cudenver.edu/~bwilson/ChoosingOurFuture.html
13. Moore, M. G. (1997). Theory of transactional distance. Retrieved September 13, 2005, from http:// www.uni-oldenburg.de/zefycde/found/moore93.pdf#search= 'transactional%20distance%20 theory'
14. Morrison, G., Ross, S., & Kemp, J. (2004). Designing effective instruction (4th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
15. Nardi, B. A., & O'Day, V. L. (1999). Information ecologies: Using technology with heart. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
16. Newell, A., Shaw, J. C., & Simon, H. A. (1963). The process of creative thinking. In G. Gruber, G. Terrell, & M. Werthereimer (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to creative thinking (pp. 63-119). New York: Atherton Press.
17. Reigeluth, C. M. (1999). Instructional-design theories and models: Vol. II, A new paradigm in instructional theory. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
18. Reiser, R. A., & Dempsey, J. V. (2002). Trends and issues in instructional design and technology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
19. Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 155-169.
20. Rossett, A. (2003). Revisiting instructional design. Instructional systems design revisited: A compendium of performance improvement articles (pp. 1-5). International Society for Performance
21. Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
22. Silvern, L. C. (1964). Designing instructional systems. Los Angeles: Education and Training Consultants.
23. Sims, R. (2003). Interactivity and feedback as determinants of engagement and meaning in e-learning environments. In S. Naidu (Ed.), Learning & teaching with technology: Principles and practices. London: Kogan Page.
24. Sims, R. (2006). Beyond instructional design: Making learning design a reality. Journal of Learning Design, 1(2), 1-8. (Keynote Paper). Retrieved May 16, 2006, from http://www.jld.qut.edu.au
25. Sims, R., Dobbs, G., & Hand, T. (2002). Enhancing quality in online learning: Scaffolding design and planning through proactive evaluation. Distance Education, 23(2), 135-148.
26. Sims, R., & Jones, D. (2003). Where practice informs theory: Reshaping instructional design for academic communities of practice in online teaching and learning. Information Technology, Education and Society, 4(1), 3-20.
27. Smith, P. L., & Ragan, T. J. (2005). Instructional design (3rd ed.). New York: John Wiley.
28. Stein, D. S., Wanstreet, C. E., Calvin, J., Overtoom, C., & Wheaton, J. E. (2005). Bridging the transactional distance gap in online learning environments. American Journal of Distance Education, 19(2), 105-118.
29. Tennyson, R. D. (1999). Instructional development and ISD4 methodology. Performance Improvement, 38(6), 19-27.
30. Weaver, W. (1948). Science and complexity. American Scientist, 36, 536.