Organ sales and moral distress

Journal of Applied Philosophy

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 41-52

  Rivera López, Eduardo ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD TORCUATO DI TELLA   (Argentina)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL APPROACH; ARTICLE; COMMERCIAL PHENOMENA; ECONOMICS; ETHICAL THEORY; ETHICS; HEALTH CARE AND PUBLIC HEALTH; HUMAN; LIVING DONOR; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; PHILOSOPHICAL APPROACH; PHILOSOPHY; POLICY; SOCIAL JUSTICE; TRANSPLANTATION;

ANALYTICAL APPROACH; HEALTH CARE AND PUBLIC HEALTH; PHILOSOPHICAL APPROACH;

COMMERCE; ETHICAL ANALYSIS; ETHICAL THEORY; HUMANS; LIVING DONORS; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; PHILOSOPHY; PUBLIC POLICY; SOCIAL JUSTICE; TISSUE AND ORGAN PROCUREMENT;

EID: 33746199928     PISSN: 02643758     EISSN: 14685930     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5930.2006.00319.x     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. E. Rivera-López, ‘What is (exactly) wrong with selling your own body parts?’ in M. J. Bertomeu and A. Salles (ed.) Bioethics: Latin American Perspectives (Amsterdam/ Atlanta: Rodopi 2002).
2. See J. F. Blumstein, The case for commerce ‘in organ transplantation’, Transplantation Proceedings 24, 5, (1992) 2193
3. J. Radcliff-Richards et al., ‘The case for allowing kidney sales’, The Lancet 352 (1998): 1950
4. R. A. Epstein (1997) Mortal Peril. Our Inalienable Right to Health Care? (Reading, Mass et al., Addison-Wesley)
5. D. Jefferies, ‘The body as commodity: the use of markets to cure the organ deficit’, Indiana Journal of Global Studies 5, (1998): 2
6. J. S. Taylor, ‘Autonomy, constraining options, and organ sales’, Journal of Applied Philosophy 19 (2002): 3.
7. J. Rawls, A Theory of Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1972), pp. 8–9.
8. L. B. Murphy, ‘The demands of beneficence’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 22 (1993): 4.
9. L. McFall, ‘Integrity’, Ethics 98 (1987): 1.