On line elaboration of a mental model during the understanding of an animation

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 4045 LNAI, Issue , 2006, Pages 40-54

  Schneider, Emmanuel ^a   Boucheix, Jean Michel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE BOURGOGNE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTROLLABILITY; DATA ACQUISITION; KINEMATICS; LEARNING SYSTEMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

EYE FIXATIONS; EYE TRACKING DATA; MENTAL MODELS; POSITIVE EFFECT;

ANIMATION;

EID: 33746191661     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/11783183_6     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. Baccino, T. (2004). La lecture électronique: Presses Universitaires de Grenoble.
2. Bennet, G. K., Seashore, H. G.& Wesman, A. G. (1973,2002). Differential aptitude test. Sème edition. ECPA.
3. ème JETCSIC; 17 Juin, Nice.
4. Bétrancourt, M. (2005). The animation and interactivity principles in multimedia learning. In R. Mayer (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 287-296). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Bétrancourt, M., & Tversky, B. (2000). Effect of computer animation on user's performance: a review. Le travail humain, 4, 63, 311-329.
6. Bogacz, S., & Trafton, J. G. (2005). Understanding dynamic and static displays: using images to reason dynamically. Cognitive Systems Research, In Press, Corrected Proof.
7. Boucheix, J.M. (submitted). Children interaction with technical animations: user control and attentionnal cues
8. Boucheix, J.M.; & Guignard, H. (2005). Which animation condition can improve text comprehension in children? European Journal of Psychology of Education, 20(4), 369-388.
9. Boucheix, J.M.; & Schneider, E., (submitted). Designing "apprehendable" animation features to enhance mental animation in multimedia comprehension: micro steps format and user control.
10. Ferguson, E. L., & Mary, H. (1995). Learning with real machines or diagrams: application of knowledge to real-word problems. Cognition and Instruction, 13(1), 126-160.
11. Hegarty, M. (1992). Mental Animation: Inferring Motion From Static Displays of Mechanical Systems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition September, 18(5), 1084-1102.
12. Hegarty, M. (2004). Mechanical reasoning by mental simulation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(6), 280-285.
13. Hegarty, M. (2005). Multimedia learning about physical system. In R. Mayer (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 447-465). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Hegarty, M., & Just, M. A. (1989). Understanding machines from text and diagrams. In H. Mandl & J. R. Levin (Eds.), Knowledge acquisition from text and pictures (pp. 171-194). North-Holland: Elsevier Science.
15. Hegarty, M. & Just, M.A. (1993). Constructing mental models from texts and diagrams. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 717-742.
16. Hegarty, M., & Sims, V.K. (1994). Individual differences in mental animation during mechanical reasoning. Memory & Cognition, 22, 411-430.
17. Hidrio, C., & Jamet, E. (2002). Compréhension d'un dispositif technique: apports d'une illustration dynamique et des traitements multiples. Psychologie Française, 47-1, 61-67.
18. Lowe, R.K. (1999). Extracting information from an animation during complex visual learning. European Journal of Psychology of Education. Special Issues: visual Learning, W. Schnotz, (Ed). XIV, 2, 225-244.
19. Lowe, R.K. (2004). Interrogation of a dynamic visualization during learning. Learning and Instruction, 14, 257-274.
20. Mayer, R.E. (2001) Multimedia learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. Mayer, R.E., & Chandler, P. (2001). When learning is just a clik away: does simple user interaction foster deeper understanding of multimedia messages. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 390-397.
22. Narayanan, N.H., & Hegarty, M. (1998). On designing comprehensible interactive hypermedia manuals. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 48, 267-301.
23. Narayanan, H. N., & Hegarty, M. (2002). Multimedia design for communication of dynamic information. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 57(4), 279-315.
24. Palmiter, S., & Elkerton, J. (1993). Animated demonstrations for learning procedural computer-based tasks. Human-Computer Interaction, 8, 193-216.
25. Rieber, L. P., Tzeng, S.-C., & Tribble, K. (2004). Discovery learning, representation, and explanation within a computer-based simulation: finding the right mix. Learning and Instruction, 14(3), 307-323.
26. Rouet, J.F., Merlet, S., Ros, C., Richard, E., & Michaux, C. (2002). Effects of animated illustrations on the comprehension of an expository text. Poster Session of EARLI-SIG, "Comprehension of Verbal and Pictorial Information". Poitiers: august 29.
27. Schwan, S., & Riempp, R. (2004). The cognitive benefits of interactive videos: learning to tie nautical knots. Learning and Instruction, 14, 293-305.
28. Schnotz, W., & Grzondiel, H. (1999). Individual and co-operative learning with interactive animated pictures. European Journal of Psychology of Education, XIV, 245-265.
29. Sims, V. K., & Hegarty, M. (1997). Mental animation in the visuospatial sketchpad: evidence from dual-task studies. Memory and Cognition, 25(3), 321-332.
30. Tassini, S., & Bétrancourt, M. (2003). Le contrôle sur l'animation influence-t-elle le niveau d'efficacité cognitive de l'animation. Neuvièmes Journées JETCSIC, 21 juin : Dijon.
31. Tversky, B., Bauer-Morrison, J., & Bétrancourt, M. (2002). Animation : can it facilitate ? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 57, 247-262.